Residual lifetime risk for developing hypertension is 90% among middle-aged Americans
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 22:47:36 | Susan Jeffrey


CLICK HERE FOR MEDIAPULSE: Acupuncture for hypertension? ABC sticks it to the JAMA study

Chicago, IL - A new report from the Framingham Heart Study shows the residual lifetime risk for developing hypertension among middle-aged men and women is an astonishing 90%. The new report appears in the February 27, 2002 issue of JAMA.1

Many women know their lifetime risk of breast cancer is one in eight or nine, and men their lifetime risk of prostate cancer about one in 10, lead author Dr Ramachandran S Vasan (Boston University) told heartwire in an interview. The residual lifetime risk of hypertension has not been clear until now, but the new results suggest 9 in 10 of middle-aged individuals will develop high blood pressure.

"It is an astounding statistic," Vasan said. "If I had to guess, I would have guessed something like 70-75%."

Previous studies have suggested though, that the development of hypertension is not an inevitable feature of aging, and can be prevented by adopting lifestyle related measures including increased physical activity, lower weight, reduced consumption of dietary sodium and increased intake of fruits and vegetables.

"It is possible to age successfully without having an increase in blood pressure," Vasan said. "We're hoping that this statistic is the motivation people need to adopt a healthier lifestyle."


Cause for concern

"Ninety percent is a staggering statistic and cause for concern," Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G Thompson said in a statement from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) that supports the Framingham Heart Study. "This finding should energize Americans to take steps to protect themselves against high blood pressure."

In the same statement, NHLBI director Dr Claude Lenfant said, "Americans have to better understand their risk of developing high blood pressure. They cannot adopt a wait and see approach," he added. "If they do, chances are they will find themselves with high blood pressure, and that puts them at increased risk for heart disease and stroke."

Dr Jerome D Cohen (St Louis University Medical Center, St Louis, MO), a member of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program, was also taken aback by the high risk shown in this study. "That number was a surprise to me," he told heartwire. "This group has shown that [hypertension] is quite a burden, and most people will develop it over time if they live long enough."

The high numbers mean strategies to prevent, detect, and treat this condition become even more critical, Cohen said.



Threshold of risk

In the current study, Vasan and colleagues used a cohort from the Framingham data, 1298 participants who were free of hypertension in 1975, and aged either 55 or 65 at baseline. They calculated the lifetime risk for hypertension for these subjects, defined as blood pressure > 140/90 mm Hg or the use of antihypertensive medications, based on data gathered between 1976 and 1998. In addition, they compared lifetime risk from this time period to a previous period from the Framingham study, 1952 to 1975, to see whether the risk had changed over time.

The residual lifetime risk for stage 1 hypertension (> 140/90 mm Hg regardless of treatment) was about 90% for both age groups, and was similar for both women and men. The lifetime probability of receiving antihypertensive medication was 60%.

Several trends emerged from the comparison of the two time periods. While the risk for women remained unchanged, the risk for men of developing hypertension was 60% higher in the contemporary time period compared to the earlier 1952-1975 period.

In their report, the researchers speculate this finding may be related to trends in BMI, which remained more or less unchanged for women between these time periods, but increased significantly among men in the later period.

Residual lifetime risk of hypertension for men and women, aged 55 and 65 at baseline, comparing two Framingham time periods

Patient group

1952-1975

1976-1998

p value

Men - baseline 55 years

82%
93%
<0.001

Men - baseline 65 years

65%
83%
<0.001

Women - baseline 55 years

92%
91%
0.68

Women - baseline 65 years

93%
89%
0.51
To download table as a slide, click on slide logo below

The comparison also showed that the risk of stage 2 hypertension (160 mm Hg or higher regardless of treatment) decreased for both sexes between the time periods, probably due to an increased use of antihypertensive medications.

"We also asked a parallel question, dividing the lifetime risk into short-term risks over 10 years following the attainment of age 55 or 65, and the long-term risk over 20 to 25 years - the average life expectancy of 55- and 65-year-olds," Vasan said.

The researchers found that a substantial proportion of the increase in lifetime risk was realized within the first 10 years after age 55 and 65. More than half of those aged 55 and about two thirds of those aged 65 went on to develop hypertension within 10 years of the baseline measure.

"It's not that people are developing high blood pressure toward the end of their life span; it's occurring within 10 years of reaching age 55 or 65," Vasan said.



Acupuncture for hypertension? ABC sticks it to the JAMA study

New York, NY - The mainstream media gave an almost imperceptible nod to the JAMA study by Vasan et al. Most of the smattering of news outlets that picked up the research ran an Associated Press (AP) or Reuters wire service story and stuck to the basic study findings.

The New York Times, for one,ran the Reuters story while NBC relayed a combined AP/Reuters overview of the research. Both news agencies highlight a point made by the study authors that the 90% cited in the JAMA paper likely underestimates the number of people at risk: "Because that Boston suburb [where the Framingham data was collected] is predominantly white, and blacks are known to have higher rates of high blood pressure, the authors called the findings conservative for the country as a whole."

In the Boston Herald, reporter Michael Lasalandra sought comment from Dr Chris Cannon (Brigham and Women's Hospital). Lasalandra writes that the numbers were "surprising" to Cannon, who thought that they "must be taken seriously."

"You don't just want to write it off,'' Cannon is quoted in the Herald. "You've got to work through lifestyle and medications to control it."

ABC's World News Tonight on the evening of February 26, 2002 was a conspicuous exception to the otherwise low-key coverage of Vasan et al's findings. The network's story touched fleetingly on key points from the JAMA paper, but devoted the bulk of its report to more recondite research proposing a somewhat pricklier solution to soaring blood pressure rates than antihypertensive drugs: acupuncture.

World News Tonight's report, as well as the online story posted on ABCNews.com the next day, quoted Dr Randal Zusman, (Massachusetts General Hospital), a self-acknowledged "pill-pusher" when it comes to blood pressure control. But Zusman, according to ABC, "is looking for alternatives for relieving hypertension."

"There is an extensive literature from Asian and Russian communities that acupuncture does indeed lower blood pressure," Zusman is quoted. "A substantial number of our patients have responded with significant reductions in blood pressure," which seem to last even after the acupuncture treatments have stopped. "The implication is that 12 acupuncture treatments over a 6-week period will produce a cure," he told ABC. Zusman is currently testing this hypothesis in a pilot trial.

Also cited in the ABC News story is Dr John Longhurst (University of California, Irvine), stating, "There's evidence from our laboratory and many other laboratories to suggest that the cells quiet down after acupuncture."

-Shelley Wood



Source
  1. Residual lifetime risk for developing hypertension in middle-aged women and men2002; 287(8):1003-10 





You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME