Cardiac rehabilitation for survivors of MI underused in the US
Fri, 07 Nov 2003 18:45:00 | Julia Rommelfanger

Washington, DC - A majority of heart attack survivors do not receive appropriate care and counseling, with less than one third of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation services, a US survey found. The data on post-MI rehabilitation services in 19 US states and the District of Columbia appeared in the November 7, 2003 issue of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.1

Although cardiac rehabilitation, including the management of cholesterol and lipid levels, hypertension, diabetes, and weight, as well as counseling on diet, physical activity, and smoking cessation, is key to reducing cardiac risk factors and improving survival rates post-MI, many eligible patients do not seize the opportunity to participate in such programs. To determine the actual rate of participation in cardiac rehabilitation, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a telephone survey of 65253 people in 19 states and Washington, DC. The report, by Dr C Ayala (National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC) et al, says that in 2001, 4% of those interviewed reported having ever suffered an MI. Only 30% of them said they were in cardiac rehabilitation after the event.

Group

Suffered MI, n (%)

Received cardiac rehabilitation, n (%)

Total (n=65253)

2765 (4.1)
720 (29.5)

Men (n=26451)

1503 (5.4)
453 (33.5)

Women (n=38802)

1262 (3.0)
267 (22.8)
To download table as a slide, click on slide logo below

Men, persons aged 50 to 64, and those with higher education levels were more likely than other MI survivors to have received cardiac care and counseling. After adjustment for sex, age, and education level, cardiac care receivers were more likely than nonreceivers to report high cholesterol levels and regular aspirin intake, to be physically active, and to have been counseled to maintain a cardioprotective diet.

An editorial note addressed several limitations of the survey: because it was restricted to heart-attack survivors not residing in long-term care facilities in only 19 states and DC, the findings may not be representative of the US population. Further, disease severity, which was not recorded, could play a role in the differences in cardiac rehabilitation rates, and self-reported health data can always be subject to bias. However, the low rate of MI survivors receiving cardiac rehabilitation services calls for public health efforts to help more patients to obtain such important care and counseling, according to the report, including:

Insurance plans that increasingly cover cardiac rehabilitation.

Updated guidelines for physicians.

Assessment of patients' participation in the services offered.

A reminder system for patients to improve compliance.

Better education for MI survivors in cardiac rehabilitation.

Further studies, Ayala et al suggest, should "identify factors that improve participation and adherence to lifestyle modifications prescribed in cardiac rehabilitation."

Source
  1. Receipt of cardiac rehabilitation services among heart attack survivors--19 states and the District of Columbia, 20012003; 52:1072-1075 



Your comments
Cardiac rehabilitation for survivors of MI underused in the US
# 1 of 3
September 23, 2006 12:07 (EDT)
lawrence anchah
Phase III and IV need more involvement of other healthcare profesional.
I believe that having poor utilization of facilities in developed countries may due commitment of time, or simply poor education program done by private practitioners such as pharmacist doing retail to provide rehab centre. In our developing countries it mainly due to logistic factors such as poor transportation facilities and patients living in rural area. He have try so hard in education level but poor follow up is our main problem. Not much research done in developing countrie regarding this matters. I woud like hear some information from the floor. Best regard.
# 2 of 3
September 26, 2006 01:40 (EDT)
Becky Christianson
Finances a concern...
In my hospital, getting reimbursement is a major problem. Phase 1 and 2 are not a huge problem, but 3 and 4 seem to be 'not medically necessary" in the rural care areas. I'm not sure if it is a coding issue or regional catchment area issue, but here rehab of any kind is hard to get paid IF it is outpt. Inpt rehab doesn't seem to be a problem IF it falls under the "right" DRG. Again, a payment issue.

Travel time is a problem, also. When you are going for rehab, and appear to be well enough to walk around your house (or down your 1/2 mile lane to your mailbox and back), neighbors and family may feel that you really don't "need" to go and walk on that treadmill at the hospital, can't ask for any more time off work to take you if you can't drive, and there is limited elderly bus transportation to get you to the hsopital for rehab.

Until there is a REAL emphasis on preventive and rehabilitative care, there will be no further reimbursement. I guess it is much easier to pay for the meds (barely) and the hospital care (even more barely, if that is correct English) than to pay for your insureds to become more fit and educated about their own health care.

That's my two cents' worth.
# 3 of 3
October 9, 2006 11:28 (EDT)
Daniel Tarditi
US approach to medicine
Why pay for rehab to get people in shape, lower their blood pressure, reduce rehospitalizations, encourage compliance, and educate patients all at once when you can send them out, have them not take their meds, keep smoking, and come back with SCD, recurrent infarction or heart failure?

Better to spend that money fighting a war in another country than on the largest consumer of health resources. Penny wise, dollar foolish.

Unfortunately, all we can do is vent in this forum. Although, it is helping to lower MY blood pressure.

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME