Stockholm, Sweden - A combination of high-dose vitamin B6 and folic acid may actually increase the risk of MI and stroke in MI survivors, according to the
Norwegian Vitamin Trial (NORVIT). Investigators for the trial, presented at a
European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Congress 2005 hotline session, say the findings should put an end to the hope that using a folic-acid/B-vitamin combination to lower homocysteine can decrease clinical events.
 |
|
Dr Kaare Harald Bønaa
|
"The homocysteine hypothesis is dead," principal investigator Dr Kaare Harald Bønaa (University of Tromsø, Norway) told the press. "Homocysteine is not a causal risk factor; it is an innocent bystander."
NORVIT enrolled 3749 patients, age 30 to 84, from 35 Norwegian hospitals. Trial participants were randomized to one of four study groups: a combination folic-acid and vitamin-B6 group, a folic-acid-only group, a vitamin-B6 group, or placebo. Doses used for each group were 0.8 mg daily for folic acid and 40 mg daily for vitamin B6; 0.4 mg of vitamin B12 was given with the folic-acid dose. The primary end point of the trial was a combination of nonfatal and fatal MI and stroke after 3.5 years. Secondary end points included death, stroke, MI, need for PCI/CABG, and hospitalization for unstable angina.
As Bønaa reported here today, the combination of vitamin B6 and folic acid, as well as folic acid alone, effectively lowered homocysteine levels by 28% but did not have the expected beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk. At follow-up, the risk of stroke and MI was 18% in the placebo group, roughly the same as that seen in both the folic-acid-only group and the vitamin-B6-only group. By contrast, in the combination group, 23% of patients had a fatal or nonfatal stroke or MI, a statistically significant absolute increase of 5%, compared with the other treatment arms (p=0.029). No differences were seen in any of the secondary end points.
Rate of adverse events per 1000 person-years
End point
| Combination group
| Folic acid
| Vitamin B6
| Placebo
|
MI/stroke
| 82
| 67
| 70
| 67
|
MI
| 73
| 58
| 64
| 59
|
Death
| 38
| 29
| 33
| 31
|
Cancer
| 12
| 12
| 8
| 9
|
To download table as a slide, click on slide logo below
Of note, investigators also saw a trend toward an increased incidence in cancer among patients taking high-dose folic acid, a finding Bønaa said should be studied further. To heartwire, Bønaa explained that while NORVIT did not explore possible mechanisms for the increased MI/stroke risk, there are some indications from previous studies that folic acid and vitamin B6 can speed up the methylation of DNA, thereby accelerating cell growth and increasing cancer risk.
No subgroup benefits
"High doses of B vitamins should not be prescribed for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease," Bønaa concluded, adding that vitamin B6 and folic acid are sold in high doses in the US but are not as easy to obtain over the counter in Europe.
 |
|
Dr Ian Graham
|
Dr Ian Graham (Trinity College Dublin, Ireland), who discussed the implications of NORVIT following its presentation, pointed out that although the trial's power calculations were appropriate, the study may not have been large enough to clearly establish the effects of a folic-acid/B-vitamin combination on CVD risk. Likewise, the study's 2x2 factorial design made it difficult to isolate the effects of folic acid, Graham noted. While the results raise "interesting questions" about the relationship between folic acid and cancer, this relationship is by no means clear and should thus only "signal the need for ongoing surveillance," he said.
Graham concluded, "Although lack of proof of benefit cannot prove no benefit, we cannot advocate the use of B vitamins post MI at this time, and the relationship between homocysteine and vascular disease cannot thus far be established as causal."
 |
|
Dr Alexander Battler
|
Commenting on the study for heartwire, Dr Alexander Battler (University of Tel-Aviv, Petach-Tikva, Israel) was reluctant to agree that the homocysteine hypothesis was doomed. "This study enrolled a relatively small group of patients and it shows a certain result, but when you take all the evidence together, you can't say at this stage that the concept is proven or unproven. There may still be something behind it, perhaps particularly for patients with genetically high homocysteine, but we still need larger studies."
Of note, however, no one subgroup in NORVIT appeared to benefit from high-dose B vitamins. Indeed, patients with the highest homocysteine levels at the start of the study were more likely to experience adverse events in the high-dose combination group, as were patients with impaired renal function and patients who reported using other vitamin supplements in addition to the study medication.
| The success of failed trials |
|
 |
|
Dr Robert Califf
|
By failing to show that homocysteine lowering can improve cardiovascular risk, NORVIT falls into a category of studies dubbed, by one expert, a highly successful failed trial. In an ESC session yesterday entitled "Cardiovascular clinical trialsclose inspection, rear view," Dr Robert Califf (Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC) paid tribute to trials deemed failures by the sponsor.
"The alternative world of failed trials for me is that most failed trials are great successes. From the perspective of patients and healthcare providers, there is no such thing as a failed trial, just additional information that should help make us better."
In the case of high-dose vitamin B, some physicians have already been advising patients to take high-dose B vitamins in the hopes that lowering homocysteine levels would decrease their risk of future events; the NORVIT results should discourage such a strategy, Bønaa said.
Should further studies corroborate NORVIT, high-dose vitamin B will join the time-honored tradition in cardiology of therapeutic strategies believed to be beneficial, used in patients, then proven harmful, a process also highlighted by Califf and others in yesterday's session. "Cardiology has been the leading specialty in doing clinical trials that failthis tells us what treatments we shouldn't be giving. I wish more specialties had more failed clinical trials that were honestly reported. It would save a lot of lives and disability!"
-SW
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
September 5, 2005 10:22 (EDT)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
laboratory assesment you donot say any thing about it |
|
 |
 |
|
|
September 6, 2005 02:43 (EDT)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
It was a bad day for supplements all around Ahmed,
I went down with the vitamin ship yesterday in a very disappointing review of the NORVIT data. (I'm usually very anti-supplement, but this one seemed to make biochemical sense). I've long held out hope that the homocysteine story was much like the cholesterol hypothesis in the 1980's where we didn't fully understand if mortality was going to lowered, yet it made sense and we all prescribed mevacor. It looks like this may have put an end to the argument all together with the added concerns that not only does it not work in the post-MI population, but it actually can do harm . Additionally, a very worrisome trend for an increase in cancer rate was noted, though not stastically significant . To be fair however, post MI treatment is a different millieu than primary prevention, so this study did not address that, but I don't hold out much hope for it. I still think there is a link somewhere, even if homocysteine is an 'innocent bystander and not a root cause' as one commentator put it yesterday. I bet in our lifetime, someone will revisit it and maybe even figure it out.
Fish oil for non -sustained V-tach was also in the galley of the vitamin ship yesterday when it hit bottom. Though, I hope that SOFA will not confuse the issues with other potential applications of fish oil for lipid and endotheliail function . I still think it has application there.
I guess the take home message is that we should all just get up off our SOFA's, do a little exercise, catch a few fish, and eat them along with a little fresh spinach. No amount of supplementation has ever rivaled the safety and benefit of daily exercise and a moderate diet.
Thanks for your post. We appreciate your participation any time here on the forum.
Melissa
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
September 8, 2005 07:33 (EDT)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
High doses of vitamins The NORVIT results of MI, stroke, mortality and cancer deterioration following high doses of vitamin supplementation are not surprising.
Most of the patients, probably consumed at least half the vitamin RDA in food. The American RDA for elderly people suggests, 0.4 mg for folic acid and 1.8 (males) for vitamin B6. A daily supplementation of 0.12 mg synthetic folate (1.7 mg synthetic = 1mg natural) and 0.9 mg of vitamin B6, would have met the RDA. In the NORVIT study, the supplemented vitamins exceeded the amounts needed to meet the suggested requirement, 6 fold for folic acid, 44 fold for vitamin B6 and some hundreds fold for vitamin B12. High doses (and probably also moderate excessive amounts) of most of the vitamins (and also microelements) are documented as causing increased risks of adverse effects. The conclusion of the principal investigator, Prof. Bønaa, that “The homocysteine hypothesis is dead" is not supported by many studies.
The possible beneficent effect of vitamin supplementation on atherogenesis should be studied after a detailed evaluation of the nutritional status (for all the available information of dietary ingredients) of the studied population and with most of the micronutriens being supplemented in moderate and precautious amounts1,2. Such a supplementation would avoid major disturbances in the normal intracellular metabolic balance.
1Dror Y, Stern F, Berner YN, Kaufmann NA, Berry E, Maaravi Y, Altman H, Cohen A, Leventhal A, Nitzan-Kaluski D. Recommended micronutrient supplementation for institutionalized elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 2002;6:295-300.
2Heseker H. Micronutrients supplementation recommendations for the elderly
suggested by public committee. J Nutr Health Aging 2002;6:294.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
September 8, 2005 11:51 (EDT)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
homocysteine hypothesis I agree the hypothesis is not dead. In fact there are at least half a dozen trials still testing the hypothesis with B-vitamin therapy and hard clinical endpoints, trials such as HAPS, VITATOPS, and SEARCH, among others.
Still, we have seen this situation before in the shism between epidemiological/observational evidence (supportive) and randomized-experimental (refutative) in estrogen/progesterone, antioxidant vitamins (E, C, beta carotene), anti-arrhythmic agents in acute MI, glucose-insulin-potassium therapy, and magnesium. I would suggest we hold off on final judgement til the rest of the RCT's are done and submitted to meta-analysis. In the meantime, suggest to your patient (and nutritionist to counsel them on) a healthy diet with a lot of greens. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |