Interventional/Surgery
No longer acceptable to "sit on" failed lysis following AMI: REACT results published
December 28, 2005 | Shelley Wood

Boston, MA - Acute MI patients who fail to respond to thrombolysis will live longer, with fewer repeat events, if they receive rescue angioplasty instead of repeat thrombolysis, results from the Rescue Angioplasty versus Conservative Treatment or Repeat Thrombolysis (REACT) trial suggest. Final results of the trial, first reported by heartwire at the 2004 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, are now published in the New England Journal of Medicine [1].

Called a "labor of love" last year by lead investigator Dr Anthony H Gershlick (Leicester University Hospital, UK), the British Heart Foundation-sponsored REACT study was plagued by slow enrollment, taking over four years, then halted after investigators had enrolled only 427 of the 450 necessary to achieve statistical power. Slow enrollment stemmed in part from a lack of equipoise over the best strategy for failed thrombolysis, with many operators opting for rescue PCI, despite no solid evidence supporting this approach.

With the publication of the REACT results, physicians already convinced of the value of rescue angioplasty can use it with an easy mind. "These results indicate that rescue PCI, with transfer to a tertiary site if required, should be considered for patients in whom thrombolysis for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation fails to achieve reperfusion," Gershlick et al write.

Primary and secondary end points in REACT

End point
Repeat thrombolysis (n=142)
Conservative therapy (n=141)
Rescue PCI (n=144)
p
All-cause death (%)
12.7
12.8
6.2
0.12
Cardiac death (%)
10.6
9.9
5.6
0.26
Repeat AMI (%)
10.6
8.5
2.1
<0.01
Stroke/TIA (%)
0.7
0.7
2.1
0.63
Severe heart failure (%)
7.0
7.8
4.9
0.58
All cardio/cerebrovascular events (%)*
31
29.8
15.3
<0.01
Major bleed, n
7
5
4
0.65
Minor bleed, n
10
8
33
<0.001

*Composite primary end point; secondary end points

To download table as a slide, click on slide logo below

To heartwire, Gershlick commented that, in his opinion, one year after they were first released, the REACT results have already changed clinical practice. "There is no doubt that, previously, while physicians had felt that rescue PCI was 'right' in the setting of failed thrombolysis, the evidence for it was weak, and therefore if a patient presented to a community hospital with no interventional facilities, it could be considered justified treating them conservatively or with repeat lytic, based on some older data suggesting repeat lytic was perhaps better than doing nothing."

Now, he says, it has become common for physicians to look for failed lysis on the 90-minute ECG and to act on it when they see it, something that was not always done in the past. "It appears no longer acceptable to sit on patients with failed lysis once this is diagnosed," Gershlick commented, adding that, at his own institution, he and his colleagues have seen their rates of both rescue angioplasty and successful reperfusion increase since the REACT results were unveiled last year.

Source
  1. Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:2758-2768.



Your comments
No longer acceptable to "sit on" failed lysis following AMI: REACT results published
# 1 of 2
January 10, 2006 09:18 (EST)
shawn bonny
significance of react
how am i to interpret an unequivocal benefit to rescue PCI if none of the improtant parameters are significantly different if one looks at the p values? ie cardiac and all cause death.
# 2 of 2
January 16, 2006 08:08 (EST)
michael fischi
Not equivocal
1) There is a sig difference in repeat MI 2) It's not unusual to group cardiovascular outcomes in smaller studies. The data is actually rather robust favoring rescue PCI.

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
buttonbutton
button
Latest 5 articles from Interventional/Surgery
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Interventional/Surgery