Short-term exposure to fine air-pollution particles ups admissions for CVD, respiratory disease
March 7, 2006 | Steve Stiles

Chicago, IL - Short-term exposure to fine-particle air pollution at concentrations usually within the range allowed by proposed US federal regulations can increase the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular and respiratory disease, according to an analysis of Medicare, weather, and smog-level data from across the US [1].

Dr Francesca Dominici (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD) and associates saw the higher health risks in association with day-by-day elevations in levels of airborne particulate matter <2.5 µm in diameter (PM-2.5), which the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed to restrict to concentrations of <35 µg/m3 as the 24-hour air-quality standard [2]. But even that upper limit may not go far enough, according to the new analysis. Daily PM-2.5 levels exceeded the proposed standard "only about 3% of the time," she said, yet the increased health hazard was evident even at the lower concentrations. "This is going to be a huge piece of evidence saying that PM-2.5 is harmful to human health at levels that most of the time are below the proposed standard."

The emphasis of research should shift toward the difficult issue of identifying those characteristics of particles that determine their toxicity.

The study, published in the March 8, 2006 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, adds to limited nationwide data on the health risks of 24-hour exposure to PM-2.5 in smog, Dominici told heartwire. There is more such information for individual US cities, and current EPA standards for daily PM-2.5 levels are set city by city. The agency, which has been regulating 24-hour concentrations of smog particles up to 10 µm in diameter, is accepting comments on its proposed daily PM-2.5 standard until April 17, 2006.

"Our findings indicate an ongoing threat to the health of the elderly population from airborne particles and provide a rationale for setting a PM-2.5 national ambient-air-quality standard that is as protective of their health as possible," the authors write.

The group gathered a vast set of 1999-2002 data from a range of sources that encompassed daily admission rates, diagnoses, and demographics from 11.5 million Medicare patients residing in 204 urban regions; nationwide particulate and ozone air-pollution readings from the EPA; and temperature and other environmental measures from the National Climatic Data Center. They made same-day comparisons of PM-2.5 level increases with admissions for a range of CV, cerebrovascular, and respiratory disorders. For ischemic heart disease and respiratory infections only, increased concentrations were compared with admissions two days later. After the researchers controlled for potential confounders that could vary from day to day as well as geographically, the results turned out to be largely consistent across the entire US, according to the report.

The HF-admission rate rose 1.28% for every 10-µg/m3 increase in PM-2.5, the group found. Corresponding increases for cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were 0.81%, 0.86%, and 0.91%, respectively. The group calculated hypothetical reductions in admission rates associated with each concentration decrease of the same magnitude.

Estimated annual decreases in admissions by disease for each 10-µg/m3 fall in daily PM-2.5 levels across the US in 2002

Reason for admission
Annual admissions (n)
Estimated annual decrease (n)
Cerebrovascular disease
226 641
1836
Peripheral vascular disease
70 061
602
Ischemic heart disease
346 082
1523
Heart rhythm
169 627         
967
Heart failure
246 598         
3156
COPD
108 812         
990
Respiratory tract infection         
226 620
2085

PM-2.5=pollution particles <2.5 µm in diameter; COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

To download table as a slide, click on slide logo below

The effects were sometimes more pronounced among persons 75 years and older. The rate for HF rose 1.36% for each 10-µg/m3 jump; their increase was 1.47% for COPD and 0.92% for respiratory infection.

"With clear and continuing indication that inhaled particles affect public health adversely, the emphasis of research should shift toward the difficult issue of identifying those characteristics of particles that determine their toxicity," the authors write.

The study from Dominici and associates was funded "wholly or in part" by the EPA through a grant to Johns Hopkins University. Funding for coauthor Dr Michelle L Bell (Yale University, New Haven, CT) was provided by the Health Effects Institute, "an organization jointly funded by the EPA and automotive manufacturers."

Sources
  1. Dominici F, Peng RD, Bell ML, et al. Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA 2006; 295:1127-1134.
  2. Environmental Protection Agency. Part II; 40 CFR Part 50, National ambient air quality standards for particulate matter; proposed rule. Federal Register, January 17, 2006. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AIR/2006/January/Day-17/a177.pdf.




You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
buttonbutton
button
Previews
Featured CME