 |
|
Source: tuberose.com
|
Boston, MA - Amid a flurry of concern over selective COX-2 inhibitors, many doctors have been switching patients to traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). But a new large prospective study suggests that even the old mainstays of pain relief may be problematic. In a
Circulation paper published online March 13, 2006, researchers report that regular use of analgesics, including over-the-counter drugs, can significantly increase the risk of major cardiovascular events [
1].
"Our study emphasizes the importance of examining even the drugs we've been using for a long time, because they may not be as safe as we've assumed," lead author Dr Andrew Chan (Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) told heartwire. "People are taking these products more often and for longer periods of time, and this is not something that should be undertaken lightly."
 |
|
Dr Andrew Chan (Source: Massachusetts General Hospital)
|
The researchers point out that NSAIDs inhibit antithrombotic prostacyclins in much the same way as COX-2 selective inhibitors. Although nonselective NSAIDs also inhibit COX-1, which synthesizes the prothrombotic thromboxane A2, the relative balance between COX-1 and COX-2 activity is critical for vascular homeostasis. They suggest that all NSAIDs may in fact shift the equilibrium toward thrombosis and vasoconstriction.
In the present analysis, Chan and his team examined the influence of NSAIDs and acetaminophen on the risk of major cardiovascular events, which they characterize as nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, and stroke. They studied more than 70 900 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study who were free of known cardiovascular disease or cancer.
The women, aged 44 to 69, provided medication data biennially from 1990. During 12 years of follow-up, the investigators confirmed 2041 major cardiovascular events. After adjusting for risk factors, they found that women who frequently used NSAIDs had a relative risk for a cardiovascular event of 1.44 (95% CI 1.27-1.65) compared with nonusers.
Our study emphasizes the importance of examining even the drugs we've been using for a long time because they may not be as safe as we've assumed.
The women who frequently used acetaminophen had a relative risk for a cardiovascular event of 1.35 (95% CI 1.14-1.59). "Moreover," the researchers write, "we observed significant dose-response relations." Compared with nonusers, the relative risk for a cardiovascular event among women who used 15 or more tablets per week was 1.86 (95% CI 1.27-2.73) for NSAIDs and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.10-2.58) for acetaminophen.
The researchers also found that the elevated risk associated with frequent NSAID use was particularly evident among current smokers (relative risk 1.82, 95% CI 1.38-2.42) and was absent among never smokers.
Moderate use not linked to substantial risk
The investigators found that women taking NSAIDs or acetaminophen only occasionallyroughly 1 to 21 days per monthdid not experience a significant increase in the risk of cardiovascular events. During an interview with heartwire, Chan noted that infrequent casual analgesic use did not appear to pose a danger, but he said that patients using over-the-counter pain relievers on a more regular basis should consult a doctor.
He points to a number of strengths and limitations to the present study. His group looked at a large number of patients and followed them for a long period of time. But, he notes, the study is observational and analgesic use was self-selected.
"Despite the strong biological plausibility of our results," the researchers write, "it is possible that our findings could be related to the reason for which participants used NSAIDs or acetaminophen." But, they add, high doses of these agents, including aspirin, were primarily used for analgesia and did not appear to increase the risk of cardiovascular events among high-frequency aspirin users.
At this point, our understanding of the cardiovascular risks associated with analgesics is still fairly crude.
The investigators note that although they cannot completely exclude residual confounding by factors associated with frequent analgesic intake, their findings remained significant even after they carefully controlled for known cardiovascular risk indicators as well as common reasons for chronic analgesic use.
"At this point, our understanding of the cardiovascular risks associated with analgesics is still fairly crude," Chan said. "Moving forward, we will need more clarification on who the specific at-risk patient populations might be or what risk factors need to be taken into account."
Chan says he hopes this study will trigger enough questions in people's minds to help spur future research. "It is important that we continue to add to the body of literature and raise people's awareness."
Source
-
Chan AT, Manson JE, Albert CM, et al. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and the risk of cardiovascular events. Circulation 2006; DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595793. Available at: http://circ.ahajournals.org.
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
March 17, 2006 04:04 (EST)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
So, what are we supposed to use? I read through this article, and did find out later that it is an "increased" risk with high continual dosing. OK, so then what do we tell our people who have mild arthritic pain that ibuprofen or Aleve or Tylenol takes care of? You can't put them on a Cox2, so do we jump right upinto the DMARD's???!!! At some point in time, something somewhere has to give. The title makes it sound like there is an urgency here, and I am really worried that my little old people are going to see this in the newspaper or on-line and will panic and stop taking anything for pain relief! I did notice aspirin wasn't mentioned, and this suprised me. We spend so much time sifting through news and papers and research so that we can give our pateints up to the minute "facts" when next week comes along and the exact opposite is said. I am honestly asking, what do I tell my patients??!!! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
March 17, 2006 07:33 (EST)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Let the patient make an educated choice Hey Becky,
Glad to hear from you again. You know, it doesn't much matter what the facts are, things get so twisted. Before my plane even got in the air at Harfield in Atlanta, my NP called and said one of our patients was upset and demanding to know why i still had him on Plavix since it was for heart disease patients only. DUH, he had a stent. Well, I just threw up my hands.
As for your question. Here is what I do. I document. I tell them that some research points to a possible link between NSAID/acetomenophen and MI. We certainly know the renal risks of both of these and increased BP and water retention not to mention gut bleeding with NSAIS's that no lawyer seems to care about. I tell them to weight the benefit of severe pain relief on quality of life and risk. Overall, wasn't the COX 2 thing just a matter of 1% increased risk.
When I drive 30 miles on the interstate to the Mall and it's raining. I weighed the risk. I took that responsibility upon myself. As long I educate, they can choose. I tell them it's over the counter and they can purchase it without a prescription. it's up to them.
Melissa |
|
 |
 |
|
|
March 18, 2006 07:25 (EST)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
NSAID study One has to commend the investigators for doing this sort of study, which has no financial or economic incentive on its own (these drugs are all generic and the findings have pointed to increased, not decreased, risk).
I've read the data in full and while the findings are very impressive, it's important to note that the increased risk was largely confined to high-frequency use, high doses, and smokers. As well aspirin showed no harm, even with high doses and frequent use. These are positive notes that should be emphasized for NSAID and acetaminophen users.
Congratulations to Chan et al on an excellent paper! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
March 20, 2006 01:54 (EST)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Thanks! Thank you both for your advice. I had pretty much come to the same conclusion about giving the facts as we know them now and letting them make the choice and then "document, document, document". I still am waiting for the other shoe to fall, though!
Becky |
|
 |
 |
|
|
March 20, 2006 03:06 (EST)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
other shoe to fall? Becky Christianson,
Can you clarify what you mean by waiting for the "other shoe to fall?" |
|
 |
 |
|
|
March 21, 2006 10:41 (EST)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
well--- I'm just paranoid that there will be yet another research paper or trial come out adn say, no it's ok to use these for pain long-term. Again, I know that it is high dose use that cause the increase in risk. It just seems like every other week something comse out to negate a previous study ( drink coffee, no don't, now it's ok, now maybe it isn't). People leave the MDO with the feeling that NOBODY knows what is good and what isn't. This "the sky is falling" attitude makes people start to ignore well meaning advice and "do their own thing", because after all, next week it'll be fine according to the next study.
OK, I'm off my soap box. I just wished that a large randomized study of behavior modification would come out and say "Anything in moderation is fine." and then define moderation to make it understandable to a child-level, so that we can all get on with living and enjoying life!
Thanks again for letting me vent, and answering my question.
Becky |
|
 |
 |
|
|
March 21, 2006 09:47 (EST)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Trial design Becky,
I would not worry yet. The trial was huge and very interesting but observational. There is a significant potential for known and unknown confounders influencing the results. This is not sufficient evidence for changing practice - yet!
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |