Amiodarone slashes post-CABG AF risk in patients judged susceptible by signal-averaged ECG
May 19, 2006 | Steve Stiles

Boston, MA - Prolongation of the P wave at signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG), sometimes used to identify patients susceptible to atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery, can help select candidates for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in whom amiodarone is likely to prevent the arrhythmia, according to a small randomized, placebo-controlled trial [1].

Dr Marco Budeus

The drug as given in the study reduced the one-week rate of post-CABG AF by about 40% compared with placebo, a benefit associated with significantly reduced hospitalization time and total per-patient costs, reported Dr Marco Budeus (University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany) and colleagues here at the Heart Rhythm Society 2006 Scientific Sessions.

The group used SAECG to screen 374 consecutive patients scheduled for isolated CABG and identified 110 with P-wave prolongation and so considered at increased risk for post-CABG AF. The high-risk patients were then randomized to receive amiodarone or placebo, with 600-mg/day amiodarone given orally before and for seven days after surgery. Actively treated patients also received the drug as a 300-mg IV bolus followed by a 24-hour postoperative IV infusion totaling 20 mg/kg. The two groups were similar with respect to clinical features and medications.

Amiodarone vs placebo: AF incidence and related hospitalization and cost

End point
Amiodarone, n=53
Placebo, n=53
p
Postoperative AF* (%)
34
85
<0.0001
ICU length of stay (d)
1.8
2.4
<0.05
Total hospitalization (d)
11.3
13.0
<0.03
Per-patient total cost ()
18 400
19 300
<0.007

*Developing within one week of surgery. AF=atrial fibrillation, ICU=intensive care unit

To download table as a slide, click on slide logo below

The rate of complications didn't differ significantly between the two treatment arms, and all events were clinically unimportant, Budeus told heartwire, adding that bradyarrhythmias developed in a handful of patients and one in each group required pacing.

Exploring possible reasons for the failure of amiodarone to suppress AF in about a third of the patients, the group saw that those who didn't develop the arrhythmia had achieved significantly higher amiodarone concentrations (p=0.02), according to Budeus. And the patients who stayed in sinus rhythm were significantly more likely to achieve levels >0.7 µg/mL (p<0.0001), which the literature suggests can be used as a threshold for effective amiodarone prophylaxis, he observed.

Source
  1. Budeus M, Hennersdorf M, Röhlen S, et el. Amiodarone prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation of high-risk patients after coronary bypass grafting: a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Heart Rhythm Society 2006 Scientific Sessions; May 17-20, 2006; Boston, MA. Presentation P4-63.





You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
buttonbutton
button
Previews
Featured CME