Poor adherence to meds linked with high mortality
September 26, 2006 | Lisa Nainggolan

Denver, CO - Two new studies show that nonadherence to medication is common among recent MI patients and in those with diabetes, resulting in higher mortality. Nonadherence in the MI study resulted in an almost fourfold increase in the death rate in the first year after hospital discharge, while the diabetes sufferers had almost a twofold increase in mortality following noncompliance.

Both studies are led by Dr P Michael Ho (Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CO) and colleagues and reported in the September 25, 2006 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine [1,2]. Ho told heartwire that the fact that people are not taking their medications is underappreciated: "As doctors, we assume that once we've written the prescription, the patient will take the medication. We need to first recognize the problem before we can begin to treat it."

In an accompanying editorial [3], Dr Patrick J O'Connor (HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN) says medication nonadherence "is very expensive, sometimes lethal, and depressingly common." He also discusses another report in the same issue that finds physician behavior contributes to the problem "in a major way" and appraises two new approaches to try to improve compliance.


First visit after discharge is key to identifying a problem

Ho et al explain that the impact of stopping therapy early after MI remains unknown in community-based populations. So they decided to study 1521 patients in the Prospective Registry Evaluating Myocardial Infarction: Event and Recovery (PREMIER) study and assessed their use of aspirin, beta blockers, and statins one month after MI hospitalization, as well as recording 12-month all-cause mortality.

Of the patients, 184 discontinued all three medications after one month (around one in eight of the participants), 56 discontinued two medications, and 272 stopped using one medication (one in five); 1009 continued taking all three.

Those who stopped taking medication had significantly increased mortality during the subsequent 11 months (hazard ratio 3.81 in multivariable survival analysis) compared with those who continued to take any one medication. Older people and those who lacked a complete high school education were most likely to discontinue medication.

"These findings highlight the need to improve the care of patients in the transition from the hospital setting to outpatient care to ensure that patients continue to take medications that have demonstrated a mortality benefit," the researchers state.

Perhaps patients get an information overload on discharge, and the first visit is a good opportunity to reemphasize things.

Ho adds that the first physician visit after hospital discharge is a golden opportunity. "It is incumbent on doctors to ask their patients if they are taking their medications. Perhaps patients get an information overload on discharge, and the first visit is a good opportunity to reemphasize things."

He added that getting the patient's family involved is always helpful: "In my experience in a VA medical center, I like it if the wife turns up, as I don't always get the full information from the patient."


Many reasons why people do not comply; everyone should be targeted

In the diabetes study, Ho et al looked retrospectively at 11 532 patients with diabetes mellitus in a managed-care organization and assessed adherence as the proportion of days covered for filled prescriptions of oral hypoglycemics, antihypertensives, and statins. The primary outcomes were all-cause hospitalization and all-cause mortality between January 2004 and April 2005.

They found a similar rate of noncompliance to the MI study, with one in five patients failing to take their therapies. Nonadherent patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities compared with adherent patients.

After multivariate adjustment, nonadherence remained significantly associated with increased all-cause hospitalization (odds ratio 1.58; p<0.001) and increased all-cause mortality (OR 1.81; p<0.001).

Ho et al say: "The assessment of medication nonadherence should be incorporated into routine clinical practice. Interventions are urgently needed to increase medication adherence so that patients can realize the full benefit of prescribed therapies."

Ho told heartwire that the profile of patients who were noncompliant in this study differed from that of patients who did not adhere to their medications in the MI study. "This highlights the fact that there are multiple reasons why people stop taking their medication, and we need to educate all patients about this, rather than concentrating on any one particular group."



Doctors as much to blame; new tools needed to address the problem

In his editorial, O'Connor discusses the fact that doctors are as much to blame for noncompliance as patients, citing the observational study in the same issue by Dr Derjung M Tarn (David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles) et al [4], which finds that physician behavior contributes in a major way to noncompliance.

In their research, Tarn and colleagues combined patient and physician surveys with transcribed audiotaped office visits from 185 outpatient encounters with 11 cardiologists, 11 internists, and 16 family physicians in Sacramento, CA. They discovered that doctors frequently omit critical information when prescribing, such as the name of the medication, its purpose, the duration of treatment, dosing schedule, or expected adverse events of new therapies. In more than 65% of all cases, at least one critical piece of information was missing.

"Physician failure to provide adequate information at the point of prescription invites nonadherence even from the most fastidious and motivated patients," O'Connor comments.

But fortunately, there are new and innovative tools and methods under development to try to address this problem, he notes.

Dr Adrianne C Feldstein (Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon) and colleagues describe improved therapeutic monitoring with three interventions: electronic reminders to physicians; automated voice messages to the patients; and a pharmacy outreach team [5]. And Dr Eric A Coleman (University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver) et al assigned hospitalized patients a "transition coach," whose responsibilities included ensuring correct medication administration after discharge [6].

"Both these reports explore new paths toward better coordinated and safer care and are notable for integrating team care models and electronic information systems to promote medication safety and adherence," O'Connor concludes.


Sources
  1. Ho PM, Spertus JA, Masoudi FA, et al. Impact of medication therapy discontinuation on mortality after myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1842-1847.
  2. Ho PM, Rumsfeld JS, Masoudi FA, et al. Effect of medication nonadherence on hospitalization and mortality among patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1836-1841.
  3. O'Connor PJ. Improving medication adherence. Challenges for physicians, payers and policy makers. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1802-1804.
  4. Tarn DM, Heritage J, Paterniti DA, et al. Physician communication when prescribing new medications. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1855-1862.
  5. Feldstein AC, Smith DH, Perrin N, et al. Improved therapeutic monitoring with several interventions. A randomized trial. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1848-1854.
  6. Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S. et al. The Care Transitions Intervention. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 1822-1828.



Your comments
Poor adherence to meds linked with high mortality
# 1 of 2
September 26, 2006 02:49 (EDT)
Becky Christianson
REALLY???!!!
OK, maybe I'm sooting off at the moth, but did there need to be not one, but TWO studies to tell us this???!!!! And just how much did it cost to run these studies---and who paid for them??!!! Talk about a waste of time and money! And to sit there and say "something needs to be done to help decrease this problem" (or something to that effect) is absolutely INSANE! It was a waste of MY time to read this article. If you are going to report a problem, formulate some solutions that are viable and measurable, so you can again waste my time with the follow-up! You can talk and preach and give out handouts all you want, but if the patient can't afford it or just plain doesn't want to take the meds, then the provider has absolutely NO impact on helping that patient (other than maybe giving samples if available)! And if the provider doesn't feel like it's "his/her" job to teach or assess this after being in practice for however long, you most likely won't change that provider's mind about teaching and follow-up.

Thanks for letting me vent--Most likely I am taking this whole article wrong.
# 2 of 2
September 26, 2006 06:19 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
It's therapeutic!!
Becky,
I'll also tell you that not only do patients not take their meds, but patients who do take their meds take the wrong meds, at the wrong time, with the wrong dose and even take their spouses medication. If we would simply supply the resources in America to encourage adherence as well as accuracy, I submit that death rates would be less as well.
For your rant, we will bill you the standard couch fee of 75.00$ per hour. HA!
Becky, we love your rants!
Melissa

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME