Interventional/Surgery
New campaign to improve door-to-balloon times reflects a rethinking of how research is translated into practice
October 19, 2006 | Shelley Wood

Washington, DC - A new program designed to provide hospitals with practical tools to help them reduce door-to-balloon times in STEMI patients is in the works, and experts who have collaborated on the project say they hope to launch it next month. Spearheaded in part by investigators who have worked on previous Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) studies or on door-to-balloon-time research and in part by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the D2B: An Alliance for Quality initiative is still being finalized but has already prompted calls from hospitals and physicians hoping to sign up.

According to Dr Harlan Krumholz (Yale University, New Haven, CT), one of the project innovators, the D2B campaign is an example of how health researchers are rethinking the translation of scientific findings into clinical practice.

"This is a great example of the old model vs the new model," he told heartwire. "In the old model, if you're an academic, you do a study, you publish it, and you figure people read it and act on it. But the real recognition in the past decade has been that there are really variable amounts of adoption of new information among the country's hospitals and that just publishing information likely won't do anything."


Simple changes

The D2B initiative draws on qualitative research done by Krumholz and others who have identified hospitals that were consistently treating patients within the guideline-recommended 90 minutes and have been interviewing staff at those hospitals to find out what factors were essential to trimming down the delay between the arrival of a STEMI patient at the emergency department and the reopening of the infarct vessel.

One example, Krumholz said, is having the emergency department (ED) physician activate the cath-lab team and to do this by making one call to a page operator, who then pages the entire cath-lab team, rather than having the ED doctor figure out who is on call and individually page each member of the team.

"Having the ED physicians activate the cath lab was a strong factor associated with faster times, but many hospitals in the country do not have that factor in place," Krumholz explained. "It seems very straightforward, and some people might even ask why did you even have to study this, but it's because there are thousands of these different contributing factors, and when people are able to focus on what are the most important factors that need to be in place to reduce times, they can really make some rapid progress."

All of the D2B recommendations are reasonably straightforward but in some cases require a change in culture, not the least of which is more collaboration between the ED physicians and interventional cardiologists. Krumholz also emphasized that the initiative was not just for hospitals wanting to improve their times or "doing the basics" but for all hospitals. "The project is constructed to bring everyone together—to help the best get even better and those who are lagging to catch up. The effort focuses on an initial set of key strategies but also brings in much more to support the clinicians and the hospitals. We are seeking to sign up every hospital in the country that does primary PCI."

While the details of the D2B campaign are still being finalized, all of the ACC governors have already agreed to promote the D2B initiative within their individual states and encourage hospitals to get on board. Once the campaign is launched, the plan is to provide participating hospitals with a toolkit outlining the crucial factors to implement, as well as second-tier recommendations that may or may not be important in any given setting. The kit would also include information on how to best construct the team needed to implement the changes and be involved on an ongoing basis, what the roles and responsibilities of each team member should be, and how to identify the point person for the project within each institution.

"These are things that for some hospitals will be old hat, but other hospitals are saying, give it to me very clearly: what are the steps needed to get this done? We've tried to scale this down to the essentials, to make it very clear and easy, and to ultimately make this something that could be implemented anywhere," Krumholz said.

A web-based networking component will also allow successful hospitals to share tips, policies and procedures, and other documents with other hospitals. The project investigators then hope to survey hospitals after one year to find out whether the initiative is, in fact, resulting in reduced door-to-balloon times.

A wide range of different organizations and professional societies are also backing the project, including the American Heart Association, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, the Joint Commission for the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, among others.

A spokesperson from the ACC press office told heartwire that the college has already received numerous calls from hospitals hoping to find out more about the initiative. For the time being, interested parties are going to have to wait until the D2B initiative is finalized and launched, possibly in November.

For more information about the D2B initiative, contact Jason Byrd at 202-375-6653.



Your comments
New campaign to improve door-to-balloon times reflects a rethinking of how research is translated
# 1 of 4
October 22, 2006 11:21 (EDT)
Patrick Fitzsimmons
Who pays for the effect on our lifestyle?
What noone seems to be discussing is how difficult this is on practicing physicians. I am currently providing 24/7 interventional coverage but as a young physcian I don't know how long I will provide this service. To have door to balloon times <90 min, Interventionalist are required to be within 15 min of the hospital. I am typically called in 2 times a week and many of these patients are without insurance and do not pay. I think it is the right thing to do so I continue to provide the coverage but at a huge cost to my family. Two cars when we go places, canceled outings, etc... Are hospitals and health systems going to pay for call to offset the impact on lifestyle? If not I don't see this being a viable treatment option as the older interventionalist retire and leave the off hours work to the younger physicians...
# 2 of 4
October 22, 2006 02:27 (EDT)
Benoy Zachariah
Couldn't agree with you more
In Massachusetts, generally, the interventionalists get paid by the hospital for any angioplasty call taken. Until a year ago, I did angioplasty call two nights a week and one weekend a month, for free, for one of the hospitals I am affiliated with. I stopped covering when the hospital decided to hire their own cardiologists.
My wife is an anesthesiologist, and between our calls, the disruption to our daily lives was huge.
# 3 of 4
October 22, 2006 04:26 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
Love yourself
Patrick,
You just need to pack your bags and move down here to share interventional call with my partner. (Yep, we are looking for another interventionalist). I did the first 30 or so cases with him when we opened our program, but it got to be such a huge burden on both of us with canceling our offices and both being up all night that it was not worth it, so my other partner and I just do the cath and leave unless it's a complicated situation.
You'd be one in four general cardiology call, every other weekend interventional call. Call me at 270-670-5679 if you interested.
Yep, I'm shameless.
Now for your problem with call. You may just have to do what the other solo interventionalists do: shut it down for a weekend every now and then, or shut it down after 4 pm. unless it's someone who has a contraindication to lytics. Lytics aren't ideal, but they are better than nothing and rarely they are better than PCI, ONLY if there is a delay getting into the lab.
Your altruism is appreciated by your fellow cardiologists, but your family docs and other have no idea of the sacrifice you are making. Last spring, 9 months in to this project, Our own medical staff didn't support us at first when we asked for our NP's to be able to help us with rounds.We were dying of fatigue and reading echo's until 11 pm every night---((Strange that most of them have NPs in their own office but they couldn't see them rounding for us to write progress notes(with a guarantee that we'd still see every single patient every single day) this was wierd truly, not to mention very hurtful. If they truly appreciated and understood our efforts, they would have said "anything you need, we'll help you". So, the bottom line: no one loves you like you can love you. Take care of yourself. Burn out gets us all eventually and your kids are only little once. Your wife has put up with endless crap that is not your fault, but it gets hard to take, no matter how many lives you are saving. We feel your pain down here and admire you tremendously. Love yourself and take a break ---vacation, weekends occasionally, meetings., etc.
And of course, come work with us where you will be happy for ever and everything will be perfect! (ha!)
Melissa
# 4 of 4
October 28, 2006 07:15 (EDT)
James J. King
TNK + Integrilin
This is a minority opinion and is another political incorrect posting. If the cath lab is closed, thrombolytic may be BETTER.

Better thrombolytic regimens incorporating adjunctive agents such as TNK with Integrilin may reduce the non-reperfusion rates. Few hospitals can provide a reliable 24-h primary angioplasty service with door-to-cath lab times consistently less than 60 min, with door-to-balloon of 90 minutes.

Door-to-cath lab is NOT door-to-balloon and the NRMI data has recurrently dealt with this reporting problem. Thrombolytic therapy is therefore a far more practical option in many instances, and may actually be BETTER in those with pain less than 3 hours and age < 75 years old. Also the ‘delta’ needle-versus-cath lab time should be less than 30 minutes. All those receiving thrombolyics still need a cardiac cath the next morning. Thrombolytic studies that don’t have cath'ing the patient next day in the protocol are not relevant to this question.

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Interventional/Surgery