No increased MI risk in hypertensive men who drink moderately
January 4, 2007 | Shelley Wood

Philadelphia, PA - New data from the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study suggest that men with hypertension who drink moderately may not need to cut back on alcohol consumption out of concerns about CVD risk [1]. According to Dr Joline WJ Beulens (Utrecht Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, the Netherlands) and colleagues, their study is the first to look specifically at risk of MI in relation to alcohol consumption in hypertensive males.

The issue is important, the authors explain, because heavy alcohol consumption is known to increase risk of developing hypertension, which is itself a risk for cardiovascular disease. "We already knew that in the general, healthy population, moderate drinking is related to a lower risk of heart disease, but when you drink more than moderately, more than three drinks a day, blood pressure increases," Beulens explained to heartwire. "And we didn't know what the relation was to alcohol consumption and risk of heart disease in men with hypertension. Men with increased blood pressure are at increased risk of heart disease, so this was an interesting group to study in this respect."

Beulens et al examined alcohol consumption, assessed every four years, and incident cases of nonfatal MI, fatal coronary disease, and stroke between 1986 and 2002 among 11 711 men with hypertension in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. In all, they report, 653 patients experienced MI during the study period. Hazard ratios for MI declined with increasing alcohol consumption, as compared with people who abstained from alcohol, ranging from 1.09 in subjects who drank 0.1 to 4.9 g of alcohol per day to 0.41 in patients consuming 50 g or more of alcohol per day (p<0.001 for the trend). Risk of stroke, however, at least in patients consuming 10 to 29.9 g of alcohol per day, was no different from that of abstainers, with a hazard ratio of 1.40 and 1.55, respectively. No statistically significant differences were seen between beverage type and MI risk.

"What we found in this study was that men with hypertension who drank moderately—one to two drinks per day—had a decreased risk of having a heart attack compared with those men who did not drink," Beulens told heartwire. "We also looked at deaths due to heart disease and due to other causes, and we couldn't find any difference between those who drank moderately and those who didn't drink at all."


Beware of measurement error in nutritional epidemiology

In an accompanying editorial, Dr Anne CM Thiebaut (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) and colleagues caution against making sweeping conclusions from "nutritional epidemiology," pointing out that few studies adequately take into account dietary exposure and other covariates [2]. "Error in measuring exposure leads to biased and inefficient estimate of the relationship of the exposure to disease," they write.

Using Beulens et al's study as an example, Thiebaut et al detail the problem of "measurement error" in nutrition studies. These, they write, "should convince the reader to exercise caution when interpreting relationships between diet and clinical outcomes. Owing to the current limitations of available procedures and reference instruments, we cannot assume that corrected estimates of diet-disease associations in any single study are definitive."

For her part, Beulens is cautious about the study findings and emphasizes that they should not be extrapolated to women, who were not included in the study, or be interpreted to mean that hypertensive men who do not drink should start.

"If men already drink moderately and they drink safely, this really shows that it is not a problem for them to continue that—they don't need to change their drinking behavior," she said. "And it doesn't really apply for men who don't drink, because they usually have a good reason for not choosing to drink. These findings really apply to men who already drink moderately."

Sources
  1. Beulens JWJ, Rimm EB, Ascherio A, et al. Alcohol consumption and risk for coronary heart disease among men with hypertension. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146:10-19.
  2. Thiebaut ACM, Freedman LS, Carroll RJ, Kipnis V. Is it necessary to correct for measurement error in nutritional epidemiology? Ann Intern Med 2007; 146:65-68.



Your comments
No increased MI risk in hypertensive men who drink moderately
# 1 of 9
January 4, 2007 02:33 (EST)
david filips
concerns
Although the author(s) did a nice job w/ the study and the commentary, I have concerns about publishing studies like this. I know we are obligated to report the facts, but in the real world (or at least in my world) about 75% of people I see have one form of addiction or another -- alcohol being one of the worst. Every time one of the overdrinkers sees a study like this - "moderate drinking okay - they will then use it as justification for drinking. This has happened to me >100 times. . .at least, and it makes me wince every time. It becomes very difficult to convince them that "only two drinks" (usually containing four shots each, which equals 8 drinks), is actually too much. And with the amount aspirin, coumadin, and plavix people are taking, plus the concurrent risk factors of age, smoking, and HTN, the risk for getting ulcers increases if any amount of alcohol is added (and probably the risk for hemorrhagic strokes as well). A bleeding ulcer is almost always preventable, and unfortunately, most of us have seen more than our fair share of people who've died from such. Perhaps the way we should end any alcohol related study is by saying, "Alcohol is like a potato chip, if you can't stop at just one (drink a day), then don't start." Again, the authors did a good study, and are reporting the facts as they found them. I just worry about the alcoholics of the world who see articles like this and "take the baton and run with it."
Just my two cents.
# 2 of 9
January 4, 2007 09:27 (EST)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
Not a popular answer but here goes.........
David,
I share your concerns. My answer to the enthusiastic drinkers who love to raise a glass to cardiovascular health:
"Who cares if your coronaries are clean if your EF is 25%?"
Melissa

*yep, I already know........I'm in the minority.
# 3 of 9
January 4, 2007 11:28 (EST)
david filips
point taken
. . .Not to mention alcoholic cardiomyopathy of which we've both seen one too many cases. (Actually, one is more than enough.) Anyway, I'm not a teetotaler, but I sure wish a lot more people were.

Once again, the study answers an important point, and I do not wish to say anything negative on behalf of the authors.

Sometimes though, I worry that we get so caught up in our quest to prevent clotting, that we forget about bleeding.
# 4 of 9
January 7, 2007 02:06 (EST)
Daniel Tarditi
too much of a good thing
Not everything is as clear cut as we all would like. The easy answer is one glass of red wine a day. Nothing more, nothing less.

Have either of you encountered this mail order pill Rescue 1250? Just had a patient tell me they were stopping coreg and lipitor since they are starting this "life saving" and "natural" pill instead of these "medicines.
# 5 of 9
January 7, 2007 05:42 (EST)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
Here's a little info........
Daniel,
It's Res-Q 1250 and the most "pure form of Marine Omega 3 available" or so the advertisements say. I think we all agree that fishoil is an excellent supplement, but we don't have large mortality data trials like we do with statins to stand behind. As far as your patient stopping Carvedilol, that could be a life threatening move if they are utilizing it for CHF secondary to systolic dysfunction or hypertension control. I would think the statin substitution would be less immediately life threatening.
As usual, I always tell my patients that cancer, heart attacks and stroke are as natural as tornadoes and earth quakes. That's why the "all natural" approach has never impressed me. On the other hand, a good diet and daily exercise are the only "all natural" approaches to longevity that we have available. If you have to buy it in a bottle, "It ain't natural".
Melissa
# 6 of 9
January 7, 2007 10:23 (EST)
david filips
all natural
Yes, I "fight" against supplements all of the time. A close relative of mine suffered a stroke (no risk factors besides age) from "all natural" (read - ephedrine) diet pills. Some supplents do seem to work - co-q-10 in statin myositis, saw palmetto, St. John's Wort, etc., but like pills, they all have side effects and interactions. Like Melissa, I tell patients that arsenic, lead, cyanide, and uranium are "all natural" but you wouldn't want to swallow them with a glass of water.
# 7 of 9
January 7, 2007 10:49 (EST)
david filips
forgive me
please forgive my spelling in this post.
my eyesight seems to be getting worse.
I think I'll double up on my lutein pills.
They're all natural.

Melissa, thanks for the info on the newest uber-supplement. I'll make sure to down my Res-Q with a glass of Noni juice.
# 8 of 9
January 9, 2007 10:09 (EST)
Daniel Tarditi
Res Q 1250
Thanks for the information. I listened to a paid for air time advertisement "talk show" regarding this product and others including weight loss etc.

I plan to call in next time I hear the infomercial and ask "the doctor" what evidence besides anecdotes he has to prove his "product". I expect complete silence or reference to studies on Mars. Will update you when I do it.

With regard to the patient I mentioned. I called them at home and spoke to them again about the risks of stopping their medicine. Fortunately, their spouse gave them hell for stopping the pills and they already restarted the meds.

Dan
# 9 of 9
January 9, 2007 10:22 (EST)
david filips
nice work Dan
Kudos.
And good work.

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME