Heart failure
Roche warns against switch in immunosuppressant regimen for heart-transplant recipients
February 23, 2007 | Steve Stiles

Rockville, MD - Roche Laboratories has warned physicians of a high incidence of acute rejection among heart-transplant recipients in a small randomized study who, after being maintained on either tacrolimus or cyclosporine along with the company's immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept), had been switched to a regimen of sirolimus (Rapamune, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals) plus MMF [1].

Grade IIIA acute rejection developed in four of the seven patients for whom one of the calcineurin inhibitors had been replaced by sirolimus in the Heart Spare the Nephron (Heart STN) trial, according to a letter from the company to healthcare providers dated February 1, 2007 and reported February 22 on the US Food and Drug Administration Medwatch website [2]. Roche said it provided the safety information after discussion with the FDA.

The change in regimen occurred 12 weeks after transplantation. No episodes of acute rejection developed in the eight patients who had continued on tacrolimus or cyclosporine. All patients had been maintained on corticosteroids throughout the trial.

Three of the four patients with acute rejection, which emerged within five weeks of the regimen change, "responded well" to corticosteroid therapy, and the fourth "recovered after experiencing hemodynamic compromise," according to the letter.

The company has terminated the trial, which was designed to show whether the drug switch might help preserve renal function in patients subjected to multidrug immunosuppressive therapy. It cautions that MMF—which is approved for use after heart, kidney, or liver transplantation—should be combined with both cyclosporine and corticosteroids.

Sources
  1. Roche Laboratories Inc. Higher than expected incidence of acute rejection in cardiac transplant patients switched from calcineurin inhibitors in combination with CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) to Rapamune (sirolimus) in combination with CellCept at 12 weeks post heart transplantation. February 1, 2007. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2007/cellcept_DHCPletter_02-01-2007.pdf.
  2. FDA MedWatch. CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil)



Your comments
Roche warns against switch in immunosuppressant regimen for heart-transplant recipients
# 1 of 3
March 1, 2007 11:02 (EST)
Sudhir Kushwaha
Sirolimus as primary immunosuppression in cardiac transplant recipients
In the Mayo Clinic Heart Transplant Program, we have been converting cardiac transplant recipients to primary immunosuppression with sirolimus for the last 4 years or so. We have published our initial experience (J Heart Lung Transplant 2005; 24:2129-36). The main features of our conversion protocol are to generally wait until 6 months post-transplant, and employ a long "overlap" period when patients are on both the calcineurin inhibitor as well as sirolimus. Using this approach we have not seen any more increased rejection. The Roche protocol, employed a conversion which may have been too early and too abrupt - we have to remember we are moving from one immunosuppressive axis (calcineurin-inhibition) to another (mTOR), and there is the potential for a "rebound" type of phenomenon. Our approach has been very successful with uniform improvement in renal function and no increase in rejection. The secondary agents (azathioprine or MMF) were left unchanged in our protocol. I think that the Roche warning shows a lack of insight and poor protocol design as being responsible for the increased rejection.
# 2 of 3
March 4, 2007 06:44 (EST)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
immunosupression regimens
Sudhir,
thanks so much for your post and your insight to a complex problem. I'm certain others in the transplant arena are very interested in your experience. As always, any warning from a pharmaceutical company to stay with their product is viewed with suspicion, even if valid.
thanks
Melissa
# 3 of 3
March 5, 2007 12:34 (EST)
John Wang
How it's done is as important as what is done
Agreed. The renal txplant community has been using the conversion method you outlined for a while, given the known effects of CIN on renal function.

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Heart failure