Routine use of coenzyme Q10 not recommended for statin-associated myopathy: New review
June 4, 2007 | Michael O'Riordan

New Haven, CT - A review of the role of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), a naturally occurring, fat-soluble quinone produced by the mitochondria, in statin-associated myopathy suggests there is insufficient evidence to prove the etiologic role of CoQ10 deficiency in statin-treated patients with myopathy and that the routine supplementation of CoQ10 "cannot be recommended" for statin-treated patients who develop myalgias [1].

The reviewers, Drs Leo Marcoff (Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) and Paul Thompson (University of Connecticut, Farmington), write that while there are no known risks with the supplement and while supplementation is a "simple, attractive therapy," adequately powered and randomized studies are needed to determine whether CoQ10 eliminates or reduces statin myalgia in symptomatic patients.

The review is published online June 4, 2007 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.


Is statin-induced CoQ10 deficiency involved in statin myopathy?

While statins are the most effective drugs for lowering LDL-cholesterol levels and are considered generally safe, the therapy has been associated with some myopathy in patients, usually at higher doses. Marcoff and Thompson note that statins block the production of farnesyl pyrophosphate, an intermediate in the synthesis of ubiquinone, or CoQ10. With CoQ10 playing a role in mitochondrial energy production, it has been hypothesized that statin-induced CoQ10 deficiency might be involved in statin myopathy and that supplementing CoQ10 with statin therapy might be one way to reduce or eliminate such side effects.

In their review, Marcoff and Thompson searched the literature to identify studies that examined the effect of statins on circulating and skeletal-muscle CoQ10, the effect of statins on mitochondrial function, and the effect of supplementing statin therapy with CoQ10 to reduce muscle symptoms.

In various observational and randomized controlled trials, statin therapy was shown to reduce circulating CoQ10 levels by as much as 38% with atorvastatin 10 mg/day to 20 mg/day and 27% with lovastatin 20 mg/day to 40 mg/day. Although the drugs reduce CoQ10, the decrease in blood CoQ10 levels is likely due to reductions in LDL cholesterol. Normalizing CoQ10 concentrations for the reduction in LDL or total cholesterol suggests that there is no change in CoQ10 lipoprotein particle concentration, say investigators. The effect of statins on intramuscular CoQ10 levels is less clear, write Marcoff and Thompson, but they add that the data are scarce in symptomatic patients with statin-associated myopathy. The data also show that mitochondrial function is impaired by statin therapy, an effect that might be exacerbated by exercise.

In studies that looked directly at CoQ10 supplementation, a number showed that CoQ10 administration increases CoQ10 blood levels in statin-treated patients. So far, only two randomized trials designed to evaluate CoQ10 as a treatment for statin myopathy have been presented, both in abstract form, and while one study suggested an improvement, the other did not. The studies had only a small number of patients, with 41 in the positive trial and 44 in the negative trial.

In terms of future directions, only an adequately powered and randomized clinical trial will be able to "demonstrate conclusively whether or not clinicians should prescribe CoQ10 to their patients on statin therapy," write Marcoff and Thompson. With no definitive evidence of its effectiveness, they suggest a clinical trial testing CoQ10 supplementation (200 mg daily) in patients requiring statins who develop statin myalgias and who are unresponsive to other agents. "Some patients may respond if only via a placebo effect," write the authors.

Drawbacks to such a study include the large number of patients that would be required, as well as the absence of a pharmacologic-grade CoQ10 supplement and study sponsor.

Source
  1. Marcoff L, Thompson PD. The role of coenzyme Q10 in statin-associated myopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:2231-2237.



Your comments
Routine use of coenzyme Q10 not recommended for statin-associated myopathy: New review
# 1 of 5
June 5, 2007 05:32 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
My muscles know a placebo when they see one
This trick works for me.
Looks like someone in the statin industry would sponsor an adequately powered trial, if for no other reason, to gain revenue from the scores of patients who are statin intolerant, on the outside chance it might work.
On the other hand, with all the gazillions of dollars made from these over-priced but life saving medications, it would still be a benevolent contribution to medical science and preventative medicine even if it were a negative trial.
I long for a Crestor 5mg/co-Q 10 combination pill! and Make it a gel- like easy- to- swallow coating please. (Might as well shoot for the moon!) :)
Melissa
# 2 of 5
June 6, 2007 09:29 (EDT)
D Hackam
need better evidence
With the high rate of myalgia on therapy, it should not be hard to do a good double-blind crossover study with a washout phase.

I agree with the 'life-saving' but wonder about the 'over-priced'. Statins are amongst the most cost-effective interventions in all of medicine - far cheaper than seatbelts in terms of lives saved, for example. I wonder what should be the correct price of these drugs that patients would accept -- pennies a day, like aspirin? If so, where will the next generation of live saving drugs come from, if there is no adequate reimbursement for their development.

I know some people who will buy 3 packs of cigarettes a day and eat like gluttons but think that 'statins are overpriced'. Since they prevent a wide range of interventions (CABG, PCI, CEA, p.plasty, amputation) and a wide range of events (MI, stroke, CHF, UAP, TIA), perhaps they are underpriced?
# 3 of 5
June 6, 2007 09:38 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
promise I don't smoke, but I might occasionally over eat! HA
Good point Dan, and now since we have some generics on the market, it's wonderFUL!!
But, when you compare the brand name statin to the generic and even brand name betablockers for the last few years, before we had generics, it's was embarassing. Some folks were paying 30.00$ US for their beta blocker, 80.00$ for their ace and 150.00$ for their statin/ month. Then if they were diabetic, that cost as well. And don't forget their arthritis medicine.
The statin was often the first to go. .......and all of this on a fixed income. It was either have a statin tablet for lunch or have a sandwich for some of them. The statin tablet for lunch comparison is even harder to swallow when you learn about ridiculous corporate bonuses that certainly should go back into research and development. (And I'm not talking about thousands of dollars per CEO either). Only then is it hard to explain to your patient why they are so expensive.
I certainly "HEAR" you about the cigarette issue. We are making strides though. Our hospital in south Central Ky. (BURLEY CAPITAL of the world) went smoke free last week!! Yipee!!!
Melissa
# 4 of 5
April 23, 2009 12:00 (EDT)
Ty Ford
Meanwhile, two years later in April 2009
I had a TIA last week and was put on Pravastatin, 40 mg. A few days after I began taking the daily dose. A friend suggested taking coenzyme Q10 because of the lost due to Pravastatin. I began with one 50mg capsule in the morning. About an hour and a half later, I felt distinctly better several days in a row. The feeling would fade a little. I added a second 50 mg capsule after lunch or a bit later. The feeling returned about an hour later.

For me, Coenzyme Q10 works.
Ty
# 5 of 5
April 23, 2009 07:58 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
GREAT
congratulations. Hope you continue to do well!
Melissa

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME