Lipid/Metabolic
Lancet focuses on blood pressure: Hypertension "uncontrolled and conquering the world"
August 22, 2007 | Michael O'Riordan

New York, NY - With an estimated 1.5 billion people expected to be hypertensive by 2025, an argument making the case that hypertension is "uncontrolled and conquering the world" is not hyperbole. This staggering number, as well as the fact that the risk of becoming hypertensive is greater than 90% for individuals in developed countries, highlights the growing problem of uncontrolled hypertension, both in developed as well as undeveloped countries, according to an editorial appearing in the August 18, 2007 issue of the Lancet [1].

"Many people still believe that hypertension is a disease that can be cured, and stop or reduce medication when blood-pressure levels fall," the Lancet editorialists write. "Physicians need to convey the message that hypertension is the first and easily measurable irreversible sign that many organs in the body are under attack. Perhaps this message will also make people think more carefully about the consequences of an unhealthy lifestyle and help to give preventive measures a real chance of success."

Hypertension, according to the Lancet, remains a problematic disorder, despite functioning healthcare systems, a large number of available effective treatments, and overwhelming evidence in various patient populations. Screening for hypertension, they point out, is not done systematically, and diagnosis is often made at a late stage when target-organ damage has already started. In addition, the optimum time to start treatment remains "under discussion."

In addition to the editorial, Drs Franz Messerli (St Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, New York), Bryan Williams (University of Leicester School of Medicine, UK), and Eberhard Ritz (University of Heidelberg, Germany) wrote an accompanying seminar discussing essential hypertension, its treatments, associated comorbidities, and lessons learned from various clinical trials [2].


Threshold model under attack

As noted in the editorial and seminar, treatment guidelines still use the threshold model for recommendations, where hypertension is diagnosed when systolic blood pressure is >139 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure is >89 mm Hg. "The issue of prehypertension has stirred tempers to an extent that seems more suitable to medieval theologians than modern scientists," write Messerli, Williams, and Ritz. "Epidemiological evidence suggests a continuous relation between risk of cardiovascular disease and usual blood-pressure values of at least 115/75 mm Hg."

In the Framingham cohort, the authors note, there is a stepwise increase in cardiovascular events in individuals with high baseline blood pressure within the normotensive range. In people without hypertension, those with blood-pressure levels <140/90 mm Hg, blood-pressure levels parallel cardiovascular disease risk in the same way as hypertension, they point out.

Both the editorial and seminar authors point out that compliance remains one of the biggest barriers to treating hypertension, despite very effective and cost-effective treatments. Even a Rhodes scholar, such as former President Bill Clinton, was under the false impression that medication can be stopped once blood pressure is lowered. While lifestyle interventions—low-salt diet, weight loss, exercise, and alcohol restriction—remain the preferred means of lowering blood-pressure levels, adherence to these changes is "notoriously poor," and antihypertensive medications might need to be considered in even some normotensive individuals, argue Messerli, Williams, and Ritz.

The authors note that patients respond differently to the drug classes and that the most "important question to ask when selecting initial drug treatment is which class of drug will deliver the most effective blood-pressure lowering." For patients with blood pressure 20 mm Hg or more above goal, the guidelines recommend two-drug combinations, as monotherapy is likely to be insufficient. High-risk hypertensive patients not only should receive combination therapy for optimum blood-pressure control but also should receive a statin and low-dose aspirin, add Messerli and colleagues.



Diagnosing hypertension in children and adults

As the Lancet editorial points out, hypertension is now diagnosed in adolescents and children and "if ignored could lead to a partly irreversible high-risk condition years later." A study published in the August 22/29, 2007 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association shows that while pediatric hypertension is increasing in prevalence with the pediatric obesity epidemic, hypertension and prehypertension are frequently undiagnosed [3].

Investigators led by Dr Matthew Hansen (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH) sought to determine the frequency of undiagnosed hypertension and prehypertension, as well as patient factors associated with missing diagnoses, in a cohort of 14 187 children and adolescents aged three to 18 years. All children and adolescents were observed between 1999 and 2006 in outpatient clinics of a large medical system in northeast Ohio.

In their paper, Hansen et al note that while pediatric clinicians are familiar with the possibility of hypertension, "recognizing it in their patients is not simple." Based on guidelines for hypertension and prehypertension, numerous normal and abnormal cutoffs exist, which are often difficult for pediatric clinicians to remember, they write.

Of 507 children and adolescents who had hypertension, only 26% had a diagnosis of hypertension or elevated blood pressure documented in the electronic medical record. Patient characteristics associated with having a diagnosis of hypertension included a one-year increase in age over three years, number of elevated blood-pressure readings, having an obesity-related diagnosis, and the number of blood-pressure readings in the stage 2 hypertension range. Of the 485 individuals with prehypertension, just 11% had an appropriate diagnosis documented.

"Although the data to make the diagnosis were present in the patients' records, pediatric clinicians did not appropriately identify hypertension and prehypertension in these children," write Hansen and colleagues. Lack of knowledge of normal blood-pressure ranges as well as a lack of awareness of a patient's previous blood-pressure readings are two factors that might account for the low diagnosis rate, suggest the authors. Electronic records, they add, could possibly assist help address the latter factor.


Sources
  1. Hypertension: uncontrolled and conquering the world [editorial]. Lancet 2007; 370:539.
  2. Messerli FH, Williams B, Ritz E. Essential hypertension. Lancet 2007; 370:591-603.
  3. Hansen ML, Gunn PW, Kaelber DC. Underdiagnosis of hypertension in children and adolescents. JAMA 2007; 298:874-879.




You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Lipid/Metabolic
Lipid/Metabolic
Sep 8, 2008 10:00 EDT
Navigating the SEAS: Join Drs Fitchett and Chan as they present their views on the latest controversial findings from clinical on treating aortic stenosis with statins alone or in combination with ezetimibe.