Acute Coronary Syndromes
Disparities in awareness of MI symptoms
February 22, 2008 | Lisa Nainggolan

Atlanta, GA - A survey in 14 US states has found that less than a third of adults are aware of all five warning signs and symptoms of MI and would call 911 first in the event of an MI [1]. There were variations in awareness between races and between the sexes and also by geographic region and education, say Dr J Fang (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA) and colleagues in their report published online February 22, 2008 in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

Public-health measures should target blacks, Hispanics, men, and persons with less education.

"The disparities observed in this report by race/ethnicity, sex, and education level, with higher levels of awareness among whites, women, and persons with a college education, suggest that public-health measures should target blacks, Hispanics, men, and persons with less education," they say.

In addition, the state and local departments of health in states with lower awareness should collaborate to implement general public-awareness campaigns to increase the percentage of people who are both aware of all five signs and symptoms and who know to call 911 immediately if a person is having a heart attack or stroke, they stress.


Awareness high for some signs but not others

Fang et al explain that around 50% of all cardiac deaths occur within one hour of symptom onset, before patients reach a hospital, so timely access to emergency cardiac care is imperative. This in turn depends upon early recognition of the warning signs and symptoms of a heart attack both by those experiencing the attack and bystanders and immediately calling 911.

For the current study, they accessed the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone survey of the US population from 2005 and included self-reported data from almost 72 000 respondents in 14 states that included questions on signs and symptoms of a heart attack. An incorrect symptom—sudden trouble seeing in one eye—was included in the survey to assess the possibility that people would answer "yes" to all the items in a series of closed-ended questions.

Respondents were also asked to choose the one action that they would take first, from the following, if they thought that a person was having a heart attack or stroke: take the person to the hospital, advise the person to call a doctor, call 911, call a spouse or family member, or do something else.

Although respondent awareness of some of the five major signs and symptoms of MI was quite high, it was lower for others: pain or discomfort in the jaw, neck, or back (48%); feeling weak, lightheaded, or faint (62%); chest pain or discomfort (92%); pain or discomfort in the arms or shoulder (85%); and shortness of breath (93%). A total of 86% of respondents reported that they would call 911 if they thought someone were having a heart attack or stroke.

Awareness of each of the five major heart-attack warning signs and symptoms varied by race/ethnicity, sex, level of education, and by state. Awareness was highest in West Virginia (35.5%) and lowest in DC (16.0%). The other states surveyed were: Alabama, Florida, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Virginia.


Knowledge of all signs pretty poor

When it came to awareness of all five signs and symptoms of MI, results were poorer, however, with only 31% of respondents knowing all five signs and just 27% recognizing all signs and saying their initial impulse would be to call 911. Furthermore, only 16% of people were aware of all five signs plus the one incorrect sign inserted into the survey and said they would call 911 first.

Age-adjusted percentage of respondents aware of all five heart-attack warning signs and symptoms and who indicated "call 911" as the first action to take

Characteristic
Respondents, n
Awareness of all 5 signs and symptoms (%)
Awareness of all 5 signs and symptoms and 1 incorrect symptom and indicated calling 911 as first action (%)
Total
71 994
30.6
15.7
Race
White, non-Hispanic
57 761
34.3
18.2
Black, non-Hispanic
7673
18.8
7.3
Hispanic
2548
16.0
6.8
Other
3351
25.0
10.9
Sex
Male
27 163
26.2
12.6
Female
44 831
34.6
18.5
Education
Less than high school
8744
18.0
8.9
High school diploma
23 728
25.7
12.8
Some college
18 505
33.7
16.7
College grad or more
20 839
37.6
20.4

To download table as slides, click on slide logo below

"Mortality from heart attack would decrease if patients received medical assistance more quickly, [and] research suggests that patient delays in seeking help are a major factor related to delay in care," say Fang et al.

"Because only approximately one third of the surveyed population knew all five correct heart-attack signs and symptoms, state and local public-health measures should be developed to improve public awareness of heart-attack warning signs and symptoms," they conclude.

Source
  1. Fang J, Keenan N, Dai S, et al. Disparities in adult awareness of heart attack warning signs and symptoms—14 states, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. February 20, 2008. available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5707a3.htm?s_cid=mm5707a3_e.



Your comments
Disparities in awareness of MI symptoms
# 1 of 4
February 23, 2008 09:36 (EST)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
Hillary, John, Obama....where are you?
Lots of fodder for a political platform don't you think?
Give us DETAILS, not just a concept for a national health care program:
Starting with:
1. National campaigns to improve heart attack sign awareness.
2. A nationalized strategy to improve event to door time and then door to balloon time for AMI therapy thus decreasing CHF DRG expenditures!!!
3. A national smoke free ordinance (If Ireland, the land of pubs and pints can do it, so can we!!)
4. Mass Diabetes screening required in factories and all places that employ "x" number of employees with tax break as incentive
5. HTN screening , again with tax break as incentive
6. Weight reduction/obesity education
7. nutrition/PE programs manditory in every single school (as stated previously, corn dogs every day in a local elementary school is CRIMINAL).
It's so easy from a clinician and practitioner standpoint to see the work that could be done ......Hilary, John, Obama....where the heck are you ?
Melissa
# 2 of 4
February 24, 2008 10:48 (EST)
Michael Cobble, M.D.
nationalized health care
Melissa,

It would be nice if insurance companies would promote wellness and reward both clinicians and patients in weight loss, exercise, bp control, tobacco cessation, better food choices, annual physicals, cancer screening, mental health care, better diabetes screening and care, etc...

Now with Ralph Nader again to our rescue this should get real exciting???

AAFP (family practice) has lobbied congress for over 10 yrs now in a comprehensive health care plan which would cover all people and provide for basic and advanced care. Congess however is a waste of our time - answering rather to the special interest rather than the people, the simple employeer and the national good.

If the FDA were asked to approve congress (with a 95% confidence interval) and all the silly bills that congress passes - they would not be approved. I wish that all the decisions congress and our president passed were held to the same scrutiny that our industry is. Instead they want autographs with Roger Clemens and then slam him for steroid use - hello do we all have our head in the sand, many professional athletes use steroids and performance enhancers. And have hearings about Jarvik and his ads - pfizer has advertized like that for 15 years.

I'm not sure how long the people will take this or clinicians will take this. Health care is certainly broken in America - it's not bad - we have great medicine no doubt and my intent is not to be critical of how amazing our medical knowledge and care is. The current environ of MISmanaged care doesn't reward the patient and certiainly doesn't encourage, empower or embrace the clinician or the patient nor develop a partnership of complementary caring.
# 3 of 4
February 25, 2008 11:05 (EST)
becky christianson
privatized "priority" health care?
OK, here's my two cents' worth:

Hillarycare as outlined is a beaurocratic (I KNOW I blew that spelling!) nightmare, not to mention the enormous cost it would impose on ALL.
Congress needs to impose on itself term limits, so that fresh "blood" can get in there and do some work. Dr. Frist held to his promise of his self-imposed term limit. The rest should do likewise.
The backlash with PE is starting, although way too slow for me. MO is district by district banning vending machines and offering more salad lines. I would like to see more veggie choices on there--somehow, having pale white-green lettuce only just doesn't spell "salad" to me. There are more school districts also adding more to PE besides actual activity (so the kids don't know all the RULES for soccer--does that mean they have to have a written test?!) and more actual time per week. I think that the 90-minute period should be modified to take into consideration classes that need longer time (chemistry for one) and make the period time shorter like it was back in the dinosaur days. WE all made it fine, thank you, with just 45-55 minutes sessions EVERY day, instead of EVERY OTHER day (so how does having a class on Thursday, and not again til Monday if you have questions grab you?)
There are a few Medicaid managed care programs that are offering nutrition and wt loss programs for kids and families, but the drop out rate is awful. SAme for adults.
I like the idea of privatizing this whole mess, making the industry change. Government will never do it. All they want is to tax us and throw the money at pet projects. By privatizing, the onus is back on that carrier and the individual to make improvements. Any government program will be a hand-out, not a hand-up. WE do indeed have the best healthcare in the world, and the most self-centered people in the world. Until people are held accountable for their (in)actions, nothing will change. It starts both ways--from the president down and from the grass roots up. Unfortunately, we have "tried" to reform Congress before (rememeber the Republican's Contract with America?), and those men and women got bought out by lobbyists. I don't know how to put a wholesale change "inside the beltway", but it needs to be done. In the meantime, we all need to "bully' not lobby our individual school systems and make the change from the ground up. The Diabetic associations are hard at work with this, and they desparately need help. Until we get control back of our schools from the "wonderful" teacher's associations and government, we won't be able to change the mindset of the next generation (who will be caring for us in our old age--maybe). Let's start there and with telling our own insurance companies what we would like to see them do/provide. If they don't ante up, we'll take our dollars elsewhere. Then and only then are we likely to see any real change. (If you smoke, your premiums will be $10more a pay period, if you don't use tobacco, you get $10 off each pay period. Lower you cholesterol or BMI by X%, you get another $5 off a pay period, etc). My work is doing this, and people are jumping on it like flies on honey. (Including me--just another incentive to get more fit.)
OK, this is more than 2 cent's worth. Sorry.

Becky
# 4 of 4
February 25, 2008 06:24 (EST)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
Becky, it's worth at least 10.00$
Much more than two cents worth and much appreciated.
I did see a news piece this week with Katie Couric about a young gentleman whose mom utilized illicit drugs and as a result, he was born with severe CP. He speaks fluently, but he struggled to kick a ball, throw anything or just walk.
The plan calls for drug screening of welfare recepients and if found positive, offer rehab. If rehab is turned down or not completed, welfare is decreased or cut off. Sounds fair to me. I think the same should go for those who are addicts, alcoholics, legal offenders, obese, noncompliant, smokers. ALWAYS offer help but no need to keep pushing it on someone who isn't going to accept it.
I can just hear it : "but that's discrimination". Not really. They've already singled themselves out as folks who can't or won't take care of their own business. Still glad to help anyone who tries to help themselves but I'm not too interested in helping anyone who has average mentality and WON't help themselves.
As I always say, Jesus Christ always helped those who COULD NOT help themselves. I don't see anywhere in history that he helped those who WOULD NOT help themselves.
Not a bad plan and much more cost effective than our current system.
Melissa

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Acute Coronary Syndromes
Acute Coronary Syndromes
Jun 22, 2009 00:07 EDT
Early-ACS, HORIZONS-AMI, On-TIME 2... How do you use GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in contemporary practice? Given the continued uncertainty regarding the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy, what do you do for AF patients on warfarin who need stents? Answer our 3 short polling questions and learn your peers' responses.
Acute Coronary Syndromes
Jun 12, 2009 15:10 EDT
Studies suggest that major bleeding is associated with a 5-fold increase in the risk for death among ACS patients. Join our expert panel: Profs. Hamm, Kristensen, and Spaulding as they discuss treatment options and strategies to reduce bleeding in STEMI patients.