ACCOMPLISH: ACE inhibitor plus calcium-channel blocker best for reducing clinical events in hypertensive patients
March 31, 2008 | Michael O'Riordan

Chicago, IL - New data from the Avoiding Cardiovascular Events in Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial were presented today at the American College of Cardiology 2008 Scientific Sessions [1]. They showed that a single-tablet dual-mechanism therapy initiated in high-risk hypertensive patients significantly reduced the risk of morbidity and mortality by 20% compared with conventional therapy.

ACCOMPLISH, a major morbidity and mortality trial, compared the effects of two forms of antihypertensive combination therapies on major fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. It was stopped early because treatment with antihypertensive combination therapy—the ACE inhibitor benazepril plus the calcium-channel blocker amlodipine—was more effective than treatment with the ACE inhibitor plus diuretic.

Lead investigator Dr Kenneth Jamerson (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor), who presented the results of the study during the late-breaking clinical-trials session, said he was "absolutely thrilled" to present the findings of a study designed to challenge current guidelines in defining the optimal strategy for blood-pressure control and preventing cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

"If you use the combination of a calcium-channel blocker with an ACE inhibitor, you get exquisite blood-pressure control," said Jamerson, who added that similar control was observed with the ACE inhibitor and diuretic. Despite the similar blood pressure, the combination with the calcium-channel blocker and ACE inhibitor reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality 20%.

During a press conference announcing the results, Jamerson told the media that the findings are "paradigm-shifting" and the data are a clear win with a clear message. He said the ACCOMPLISH findings challenge the guidelines, especially in terms of starting with a one-drug strategy and the use of diuretics in combination with ACE inhibitors.


Clear data, clear win, and a clear message

Current recommendations for the treatment of stage 1 hypertension include the use of thiazide-type diuretics for most patients, with additional consideration given to ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), beta blockers, and calcium-channel blockers. In patients with stage 2 hypertension—those with blood pressure >160/>100 mm Hg—two-drug combination therapy, usually with a diuretic and ACE inhibitor, is recommended.

ACCOMPLISH compared the effects of two forms of antihypertensive combination therapies on major fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. In total, 11 400 men and women aged 55 years or older who had systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg or were currently on antihypertensive therapy and who had evidence of cardiovascular or renal disease or target-organ damage were included in the trial. Patients enrolled in the trial were obese, with 60% having diabetes mellitus, and nearly all had been treated previously for hypertension.

More than 70% had been treated with two or more hypertensive agents, but, as was previously reported by heartwire at the American Society of Hypertension 2007 Scientific Sessions, just 37.5% of patients had their blood pressure controlled to <140/90 mm Hg at baseline, the currently recommended target of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. As part of the study protocol, all patients stopped their medication and, without a washout period, were randomized to combination treatment with benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine plus benazepril.

At 36 months, blood-pressure levels were significantly improved, with more than 75% of patients in both treatment arms having blood-pressure levels <140/90 mm Hg. Investigators report that combination treatment with benazepril plus amlodipine reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, defined as cardiovascular death, fatal/nonfatal MI, fatal/nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, and coronary revascularization, by 20%, compared with those treated with benazepril plus a diuretic.

ACCOMPLISH: Primary* and secondary end points

End point
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
*Cardiovascular morbidity/mortality
0.80 (0.71-0.90)
Cardiovascular morbidity/mortality (excluding coronary revascularization)
0.79 (0.68-0.92)

To download table as a slide, click on slide logo below

Speaking with the media, Jamerson noted that the average patient in the study was 68 years old, and the oldest patient was 98 years old. Although hypotension might be a concern and can result in falls and fractures in elderly patients or in the frail, this was not borne out in the ACCOMPLISH study.

Dr Michael Weber (SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY), who was on the executive committee of the ACCOMPLISH trial, agreed with Jamerson, telling heartwire that the findings will change the guidelines.

"Right now, there is a recommendation that when you're putting together combination treatment for hypertension you need to normally include a diuretic as one of the two agents," said Weber. "I'm sure that recommendation will change. It might not change to the point of stating that a calcium-channel blocker like amlodipine be the preferred partner, but it will take away the recommendation for diuretics, and adding the calcium-channel blocker will invariably be a part of that."

Commenting on the results of ACCOMPLISH for heartwire, Dr William Cushman (University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis), who was a member of the study's executive committee, said he does not believe the results negate the diuretic benefits observed in ALLHAT. While the trial was well conducted, the dose of diuretic used in ACCOMPLISH makes it less definitive. No placebo-controlled or usual-care outcome study has used a dose this low, he said, noting that other trials used between 25 mg and 50 mg. While ALLHAT used the 12.5- to 25-mg doses, the same dose used in ACCOMPLISH, chlorthalidone is at least twice as potent at lowering blood pressure and reducing events, said Cushman.

"That being said, ACCOMPLISH has a definitive result and clearly tells us that the very low doses of [hydrochlorothiazide] HCTZ commonly used in practice and in many newer combination products are not as effective in lowering CVD events compared with amlodipine 5 to 10 mg when each is combined with benazepril," said Cushman. "I have been consistent for many years, including long before ACCOMPLISH was started, in saying these doses of HCTZ may not give the benefits on outcomes that we have seen in trials, since they were never tested. We assume other drugs are less effective when used at one-quarter or one-half the doses that were used in trials—why not diuretics?"

Dr Salim Yusuf (McMaster University, Hamilton, ON) said the study "looks good" but held back full praise until the complete findings are published. He agreed, though, that, based on the presented data, the ACCOMPLISH study will challenge current guidelines.

Source
  1. Jamerson KA, on behalf of the ACCOMPLISH investigators. Avoiding cardiovascular events in combination therapy in patients living with systolic hypertension. American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions; March 31, 2008; Chicago, IL.



Your comments
ACCOMPLISH: ACE inhibitor plus calcium-channel blocker best for reducing clinical events in hypert
# 1 of 10
April 3, 2008 11:26 (EDT)
Kevin Tam
Publishing
Does anyone know when this study will be published and what journal it will be published in?
# 2 of 10
April 7, 2008 12:59 (EDT)
Dmitri Vasin
Should we stop prescribing HCTZ?
Sadly, HCTZ remains the dominant thiazide on the US market and the one used almost exclusively in combination pills despite lack of outcome data.
All the positive outcome data are with "thiazides" other than HCTZ, mainly Chlorthalidone and Indapamide.
In fact, HCTZ had consistently performed either worse than no treatment (Oslo study) or worse than Chlorthalidone (MRFIT) or enalapril (Australian). The only positive outcome data are from VA study, where it was used at 50 mg b.i.d. dose in combo with Reserpine and Hydralazine!
Now we have ACCOMPLISH showing 20% reduction in outcomes with Amlodipine vs. HCTZ on the top of ACEI, but FIRST paragraph of the conclusion of the trial is talking about "exceptional BP control with combination therapy"...Are we treating NUMBERS or are we treating PATIENTS? Do outcomes matter anymore? Shouldn't 20% reduction in CV events be the MAIN conclusion of the trial? Are authors trying to burry HCTZ patient outcome failure in "exceptional BP control"?
Should someone petition FDA to put "black box" on HCTZ – “increase in death and CV events comparing with other antihypertensives and no outcome data on reduction of clinical events against placebo or no treatment”?
After all Avandia, Procrit and Aranesp got their recent black boxes for much less than that...
I stopped prescribing HCTZ to my patients completely over a year ago and switched them to other thiazides, spironolactone or amlodipine. Generic Indapamide and Chlorthalidone cost the same as HCTZ and are EVIDENCE BASED thiazides.
# 3 of 10
April 7, 2008 10:07 (EDT)
D Hackam
GREAT POINTS
I couldn't agree with you more. Unfortunately only perindopril is bundled with indapamide, which gave great results in PROGRESS (44% reduction in stroke). Not sure if the EUROPA-based dose of perindopril (8 mg) is bundled with indapamide.

Most of the diuretic trials which gave such good evidence in the 1990s were based on non-HCTZ diuretics. Chlorthalidone has a much longer half life and less metabolic issues. It is unfortunate that most of the ARB and ACE pharmaceutical companies have chosen to bundle their products with this inferior drug. ALLHAT alone should have settled the issue, not to mention all of the other studies (SHEP, PROGRESS, PATS, etc).
# 4 of 10
April 7, 2008 05:33 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
question
HYVET utilized an SR prep of Indapamide at a dose of 1.5 mg. I've never heard of this SR prep and I checked our pharmacy and they haven't either. Was this just study drug or is it available widely?
Melissa
# 5 of 10
April 7, 2008 07:13 (EDT)
D Hackam
answer
Indapamide sustained release to best of my knowledge not available in US/Canada. Made by Servier in Europe and called Natrilix SR.

Check out www.servier.com/Pro/Cardiovascular/NatrilixSR/NatrilixSR.aspx?id_=579
# 6 of 10
April 7, 2008 07:28 (EDT)
Dmitri Vasin
Indapamide SR
This is the best I could find on Indapamide SR...
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17270503
It looks like it is generic in UK, but not available here in the US...
From what I see, SR version was made to minimize metabolic side effects, which were already pretty minimal for a "thiazide".
Outcome data are available for both "IR" and "SR" formulation, so I think it is still OK to interchange them for "SR" trial populations/indications. Should be better than HCTZ, anyhow.
# 7 of 10
April 8, 2008 08:22 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
thanks
Thanks for the information Dan and Dmitri
Melissa
# 8 of 10
June 24, 2008 01:47 (EDT)
zhang wenduo
question
how about ccB combination with ARB vs others
# 9 of 10
July 6, 2008 03:28 (EDT)
Ashfaque Uddin
What will be the best combination?
for hypertension with diabetes and hypertension with ckd? Is amlodipine best to combine with ARB in such conditions?

thanks
# 10 of 10
July 11, 2008 03:17 (EDT)
Michael Cobble, M.D.
Ashfaque,
This is a very difficult question in two different populations.
1. HTN and DM evidence supports lowering bp to 130/80 with ace and or arb as foundation treatment. ACE has evidence in micro and macro dz. ARB has evidence in macro disease.
2. HTN and CDK the AASK in an ethnic population showed core bp tx with ramipril in a difficult population was better than metoprolol. Amolodipine was stopped due to deterioration.

Our experience based on the evidence is that both populations may be similar and as such we tend to focus more on: ace, arb (perhaps both), spiro or eplero, loop diuretic for volume control, NDHPCCB, carvedilol (perhaps nebivolol), consideration for aliskerin.

Hope this helps. Mike

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME