Clinical cardiology
Adenosine agonist for stress perfusion imaging approved
April 15, 2008 | Steve Stiles

Palo Alto, CA and Deerfield, IL - The US Food and Drug Administration has market-approved regadenoson (Lexiscan), a selective A2A adenosine-receptor agonist, for resting stress-myocardial perfusion scans, the product's developer and owner CV Therapeutics and marketer-distributor Astellas Pharma US have jointly announced [1].

Lexiscan was approved based on two identical phase 3 trials [2] in which the agent produced perfusion scans of similar quality to those made using another Astellas product, adenosine injection (Adenoscan), according to the announcement. Lexiscan is administered as a non-weight-adjusted rapid bolus, which, published reports observe, is a less complicated regimen than what is required for adenosine; it's also expected to have a more favorable side-effect profile by virtue of its adenosine-receptor selectivity.

Sources
  1. CV Therapeutics. CV Therapeutics and Astellas announce FDA approval for Lexiscan (regadenoson) injection [press release]. April 10, 2008. Available at: http://www.cvt.com/PressRelease.aspx?releaseID=1128317.
  2. Iskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Belardinelli L, et al. ADVANCE MPI Investigators. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: Results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2007; 14:645-658.


Your comments
Adenosine agonist for stress perfusion imaging approved
# 1 of 2
May 6, 2008 07:46 (EDT)
Tripp Nanney
info
any idea on the cost of Lexiscan?
# 2 of 2
May 15, 2008 11:09 (EDT)
Ralph Millsaps
similar to adenosine
I hear through the local rep it will be similar to adenosine...here's hoping that is true. When CVT presented their initial work on this drug the key things were: no pain, no dyspnea, and no heart block!

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Clinical cardiology
Clinical cardiology
Apr 17, 2009 11:41 EDT
Recent data among heart patients have suggested that approximately 2.3% of patients with a defected implant lead attached to their defibrillator will experience lead fracture within 30 months of having the device implanted. What are your thoughts and is this happening in your clinical practice?