Clinical/Imaging
Day of admission does not influence outcome in HF but does influence length of stay
May 21, 2008 | Lisa Nainggolan

Los Angeles, CA - The day of the week on which a patient is admitted to the hospital for heart failure or discharged has no bearing on their clinical outcome, new registry data show [1]. Dr Gregg C Fonarow (University of California, Los Angeles) and colleagues report their findings in the inaugural, May 1, 2008 issue of Circulation: Heart Failure.

"Prior studies have shown that in acute MI and other medical conditions, the day of the week that a patient is admitted influences clinical outcomes, with some results showing that those presenting on weekends are less likely to make it out of the hospital," Fonarow told heartwire. "To our knowledge, this has not been studied well in heart failure, which is one of the biggest causes of hospital admission. Unlike acute MI, we did not find that the day of the week on which a patient was admitted was predictive of clinical outcomes."

His team did find, however, that the day of admission influenced the length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, with those admitted on a Thursday or a Friday having prolonged LOS compared with those admitted on other days, even after risk adjustment. And discharges were substantially more likely than expected on a Friday and substantially lower than expected on a Sunday.

"Clearly, the day of the week on which a patient is admitted is a strong determinant of LOS, and this has cost implications," Fonarow noted. "Understanding the factors responsible for the increased LOS and making potential adjustments in staffing to facilitate weekend discharges may improve the efficiency of heart-failure hospital care." He estimates that for a hospital with 1000 HF admissions annually, changing staffing models to ensure that discharges can take place regardless of the day of the week could translate into cost savings of $330 000 per year, without a difference in clinical outcomes.


Friday admission has longest LOS, but it is also the most likely day of discharge

Fonarow et al used the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF) registry, in which a total of 259 US hospitals submitted data on 48 612 patients with HF. They analyzed day of admission and discharge, demographics, medical history, medication use, and laboratory and in-hospital procedure data for their association with hospital LOS and death rate. They also prospectively collected 60- to 90-day postdischarge follow-up data in a prespecified 10% sample.

Patient characteristics were similar for weekday and weekend presentation. LOS was a median of 4.0 days and a mean of 5.7 days; in-hospital death was 3.8%. In-hospital and postdischarge mortality were similar for each day of the week admitted, but LOS was significantly influenced by day of admission, even after adjustment for other LOS risk factors. The shortest LOS by admission day of the week was Tuesday (5.39 days) and the longest was Friday (5.88 days; p<0.001).

Fonarow told heartwire that previous studies have shown that hospital staffing is reduced on Saturdays and Sundays in terms of both the number of staff and level of experience. In addition, the level of physician coverage differs on weekends in most hospital settings, he says.

Although this study suggests there is adequate medical care and staffing to ensure there are few treatment differences in HF on a weekend—evidenced by the similar clinical outcomes seen—it does suggest preferential discharge on certain days, with Friday being most common, he notes.

This finding is not new—a 2002 Canadian study of 2.4 million medical and surgical hospitalizations found that Friday was the most frequent day of discharge, occurring in 19% of hospitalizations compared with 8% of discharges occurring on a Sunday. Among the 141 687 HF hospitalizations in that study, in-hospital death rate did not differ by weekday compared with weekends, either (10.8% vs 11.0%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.0).


Skeleton staff on weekends wastes money

"Together, these studies may suggest that physicians and perhaps nursing staff, patients, and their families prefer weekday discharge," say the researchers. "This may raise the possibility that a certain portion of HF patients discharged on Fridays could be leaving the hospital before they are fully stabilized. However, we found no evidence that different days of the week for HF admission or discharges were associated with differences in postdischarge clinical outcomes."

Nevertheless, the findings could have cost implications, they stress. "The knowledge provided by the current study may help guide clinicians and hospital administrators in implementing more effective staffing and management strategies for hospitalized HF patients. Approximately $360 million in direct costs could be eliminated each year without patients being exposed to higher risk of early death or rehospitalization," they predict.

"Future studies should be designed to prospectively test whether different weekend staffing models and other interventions to facilitate weekend hospital discharges can favorably impact hospital LOS without exposing patients to lower quality of care or higher risk of postdischarge death/rehospitalization," they conclude.

GlaxoSmithKline funded the OPTIMIZE-HF registry. Fonarow and Dr William T Abraham (Ohio State University, Columbus), Dr Mihai Gheorghiade (Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL), Dr Barry H Greenberg (University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego), Dr Christopher M O'Connor (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC), Dr Clyde W Yancy (Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX), Dr James B Young (Cleveland Clinic Foundation), and Wendy Gattis Stough (Duke University Medical Center) have received research grants and honoraria from and have served as consultants and/or speakers for GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Nancy M Albert (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH) is a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Eduardo Nunez was an employee of GlaxoSmithKline.

Source
  1. Fonarow GC, Abraham WE, Albert NM, et al. Day of admission and clinical outcomes for patients hospitalized for heart failure. Findings from the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF). Circ Heart Fail 2008; 1:50-57.



Your comments
Day of admission does not influence outcome in HF but does influence length of stay
# 1 of 6
May 21, 2008 04:50 PM (EDT)
becky christianson
ancillary staff down on weekends
OK, I may have missed it in the story, but stays admitted on Thursday/Friday/Saturday have a really good reason to be longer (even if it turns out to only be a half day as stated here). If your ultrasound dept (or whichever dept is responsible for doing echo's) is not open on weekends, there's your delay of care! And your reason for the longer stay. (at least in my opinion.) Adjusting staffing to me means more than "just" the nursing or physician coverage. That's my story.

Becky
# 2 of 6
May 21, 2008 07:29 PM (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
agree
Becky,
You couldn't be more correct. These ancillary issues not only occurr in the smaller hospitals but also in larger hospitals as well. PLUS, if you present me with a list of 20 folks to round on, the pts at the end of the day are seen after the regular day shift folks go home, so they have to wait untiil next day unless it's an emergency for semi elective testing. So, not only do physician and nursing staffing impact length of stay, the the time of day at which we see the patient, holidays, nights, weekends, etc as well.
Melissa
# 3 of 6
May 21, 2008 11:28 PM (EDT)
Wiliam Blanchet
$330 for 1/2 day?
Looking at real costs vs bean counter costs, does it really cost $330 for a person to remain in a bed for 1/2 day? What constitutes that cost; do they consume $330 dollars of food and meds? Does taking vital signs one more time cost a lot? Unless the hospital is so full that it is on divert, I think that increasing staff to send a patient home 12 hours sooner to save a theoretical although probably non-existent 330 dollars is kind of silly.
# 4 of 6
May 22, 2008 07:57 AM (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
It's madness
Dress up bean counting, hire someone who believes in it, call it "microeconomics" and you'll have every hospital CEO eating out of your hand, wearing a sign and beating a drum declaring dooms day for hospital economics. Unfortunately, it's standard fare for corporations and even though I absolutely agree that it's silly, it probably provides some cushion for the services provided to those who can't pay, won't pay or "mistakes" in projected costs and reimbursements along the way.
It's enough to make a patient want to take their own bandaids to the hospital. I was astounded by what was billed to my own insurance back in the winter for such things as "pic line insertion". Granted it took all of 5 minutes, was placed under flouro, was completely painless, (generated uncomfortable palpitations for 24 hours though which subsided and yes, it was right above my atrium), the total bill was around 4800$ for that 5 minutes procedure.
It probably made me feel the same way that it does my patients when they receive their hospital bill for my procedures.
Melissa
# 5 of 6
May 22, 2008 02:44 PM (EDT)
becky christianson
You are both on target
Wiliam, most hospitals tell you they bill per 24hr time frame for acute care and by the hour for observation. So how the half-day thing came about is beyond me---most likely the same people that said the avg American family has 2.7 children, 3.1 dogs, etc. I've not seen a .7 child unless you count "incubating" ones!
And Melissa, 24hr service/care normally doesn't extend to ancillary services-they either go to on-call or skeleton crews. Wouldn't you love to be a pathologist?! (i'm not slamming them--it was the only group I could think of off-hand that really isn't needed in the middle of the night!) And yet, you get billed the same whether that care was M-F "regular"business hours or off.
Years ago when my "little" soldier Chris was little, I got a bill for $15K for a carotid arteriogram. When I looked closer (after picking myself off the floor!) I saw I had been charged for both sides (only one was done) and FIVE IVAC pumps! (for those of you that were not practicing in the 80's, it's a time of IV pump...there goes my age!) Now I ask you, what procedure on a 5 year old requires FIVE IV pumps???? Yet the insurance company paid it in full minus my co-pay. I called them as fast as I could to tell them all the overcharges and they told me that it happens all the time and is part of "doing business"! Sorry, but that's not MY way of doing business! I wonder if that is still happening?
But--I digress on the topic at hand.
LOS should be no different. It's all in how places staff. Again, my little ol' opinion.
# 6 of 6
May 22, 2008 02:46 PM (EDT)
becky christianson
Correction:
OK, now I really do look old! I meant to say "type" of IV pump, not "time". Sorry!
bc

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Register
Click on "register" to create a account - It is free....
 
button
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Clinical/Imaging
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Jun 23, 2008 11:00 EDT
Current guidelines for thienopyridines in PCI note the lack of RCT data for higher loading doses. Read Dr Wang's lowdown on loading doses, including recent presentations from the 2008 SCAI-ACCi2 meeting. Then watch Drs Mehta and Mehran discuss where CURRENT-OASIS-7 will fit in.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Apr 10, 2008 14:00 EDT
If we're all looking at the same data, why do the European and US guidelines for the treatment of ACS differ in terms of initiation, dosing, and choices of pharmacological therapies? Drs Ohman, Montalescot, Pollack and Fox discuss the similarities and differences.
Clinical/Imaging
Jun 27, 2008 10:58 EDT
Dr Eric N Prystowsky MD discusses the current utilization of ICD guidelines and strategies to improve patient care.
Clinical/Imaging
Jun 27, 2008 09:49 EDT
Join Drs Linde, Daubert and Gold in an intriguing discussion on the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on remodeling and disease progression, with a review of new data by Dr Abraham.