Hypertension
Mild blood-pressure elevations in young adulthood linked to coronary calcium in later life
July 14, 2008 | Shelley Wood

San Francisco, CA - Mildly elevated blood pressure in young adults may increase their risk of developing coronary atherosclerosis decades later, a new study suggests [1]. Writing in the July 15, 2008 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine, Dr Mark J Pletcher (University of California, San Francisco) and colleagues report that prehypertension is, in fact, not uncommon among men and women in their early 30s or younger and correlates with increased coronary calcium later in life.

Drawing on data collected for the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, Pletcher et al found that 18% of men and women had prehypertension, defined as systolic BP 120 to 139 mm Hg or diastolic BP 80 to 89 mm Hg. They then calculated cumulative exposure to blood pressure in the prehypertension range from age 20 to 35 in units of mm-Hg-years—a method similar to the way that smoking studies calculate pack-years of tobacco exposure. They found that increasing blood-pressure levels in young adulthood paralleled increasing coronary calcium by the time the men and women were in their 40s and 50s. Whereas people with no cumulative prehypertension exposure (0 mm-Hg-years) before age 35 had low coronary calcium prevalence at the time of their last examination (mean age 44), people with the highest cumulative exposure (>30 mm-Hg-years) had a coronary calcium prevalence of 38%. The association was strongest in people with systolic prehypertension in young adulthood.

Prehypertension under age 35

Systolic prehypertension, mm-Hg-years
Prevalence of coronary calcium (%)
Diastolic prehypertension, mm-Hg-years
Prevalence of coronary calcium (%)
0
15
0
16
1-30
24
1-20
22
>30
38
>20
24

To download table as a slide, click on slide logo above

"There have been other papers looking at prehypertension in other settings, mostly in older adults, so one thing that's new here is that we're looking at prehypertension in younger adults," Pletcher told heartwire. "Perhaps the more important and subtler issue is that we also adjusted for blood-pressure elevation later in life. The reason that the American Heart Association and the national guidelines say that you are supposed to try to lower your blood pressure is to prevent hypertension. But what we have shown here is that prehypertension itself appears to be potentially harmful. Regardless of what happens after age 35, it's important what your blood pressure is before age 35, too."


No intervention/outcome data

Subgroup analyses showed that risk factors for prehypertension in young adulthood included male sex, black race, higher body-mass index, and lower socioeconomic status. "This might explain part of the puzzle as to why people of low socioeconomic status are more likely to have heart disease," Pletcher commented.

While the authors did not specifically look at whether interventions to normalize blood pressure in early adulthood would translate into lower calcium scores or fewer cardiovascular events later on, they argue that their findings clearly link early blood-pressure elevations with later atherosclerotic burden.

According to Pletcher, the study results may be particularly germane for internists and general practitioners, since younger adults may not yet be in contact with cardiologists. But the broader message—to maintain a healthy blood pressure, regardless of age—is something that everyone should be aware of, including writers of national guidelines.

"This adds another reason, and more urgency, to our national guidelines, which do say that people with prehypertension should work on diet, exercise, and lifestyle modifications in order to prevent hypertension," Pletcher observed. "And that statement should probably say, 'in order to optimize blood pressure and prevent heart disease later in life.' "

The authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Source
  1. Pletcher MJ, Bibbins-Domingo K, Lews CE. Prehypertension during young adulthood and coronary calcium later in life. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 149:91-99.



Your comments
Mild blood-pressure elevations in young adulthood linked to coronary calcium in later life
# 1 of 6
July 14, 2008 07:26 (EDT)
Michael Cobble, M.D.
Provocative
I feel like the poster child for all of these studies.

I had a CACS several years ago in my 30's (as it was offered during an educational medical eve - didn't feel I needed it). My twin brother paid for his own in the midwest.

PMHx: healthy, normal wt/waist, nonsmoker, nonsalter, regular exercise, 'normal' simple lipid with TC 160 and LDL 110, TG under 150, NHDL under 130. I presumed very low risk even with a high risk FHx.

FHx: CAD/CVD/DM including bypasses in both sides of the family and SCD.

I didn't think I was at risk even though I had PreHTN Low 130's over 80's.

I ignored my positive CACS (under 10 but over 75% for my age at the time) Eventually we performed CIMT which confirmed athero and then started expanded/advanced lipid testing showing dense pattern disease and lipid/htn treatment was started.

This data is very provocative that perhaps we can target high risk family members or high risk markers (eg. uma, met syn, dyslipidemia, prehtn, etc..) and if confirmed with inexpensive targeted imaging, perhaps risk reduction has entered a new era as Dr. Blanchet and others suggest. Certainly risk prediction has. I was very skeptical about better risk prediction 6-8 years ago. Felt the FRS was a good start, but have been able to add onto that dramatically with advances in screening, testing and technnology over the last 3-6 years.

mc
# 2 of 6
July 18, 2008 07:09 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
didn't know you were a twin
Mike,
I've always been interested in Twin data.I've found those studies fascinating regarding those who were reared in different environments and then were able to compare their medical histories. Since you guys are adults now, your envionment may be dramatically different, or maybe not. If you care to divulge (or if your twin doesn't care that you divulge! --might want to get him to sign a waiver for HIPPPA!-ha!), has there been any disparity in the progression of disease, etc. that you would attribute to environment/etc. Or is your twin genetically different from you?
Do you exercise and do you have what you would consider a normal BMI?
Melissa
# 3 of 6
July 18, 2008 10:35 (EDT)
Michael Cobble, M.D.
Twin and I
He lives in the Midwest, for me out west. But we have the same lifestyle. Nonsmokers, healthy eaters, triathlons/skiing/hiking/biking etc... Can't compare stress levels though (probably similar although he isn't a doc)

We both have the same lipid values (low total chol mid 100's but low HDL 30's) but very dense and dangerous. BMI must be low to mid 20's for both. Based on my imaging studies I would presume we will 'both' go the way of our predecessors without addressing our genetics.

I think my brother is on estrogen though and that may be somewhat protective at his early age. :o)

ps. we haven't had the same imaging studies - he had ebct over 10 years ago - young and normal. he doesn't have access to cimt and hasn't needed abd ct to assess further disease. his vitals etc.. are all the same as mine however and expanded lipids very high risk. hard to get away from genetics.
# 4 of 6
July 18, 2008 06:50 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
good luck1
Well,
Good luck!! Thanks for letting me peek into your family history. Just think of the advantages you two have now that your ancestors did not. Keep up the fight!
Melissa
# 5 of 6
July 18, 2008 06:50 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
good luck1
Well,
Good luck!! Thanks for letting me peek into your family history. Just think of the advantages you two have now that your ancestors did not. Keep up the fight!
Melissa
# 6 of 6
July 24, 2008 01:23 (EDT)
D Hackam
nice, proactive stance to prevention
It is great that we physicians can avail ourselves of the best that preventive medicine has to offer. I salute Dr. Cobble for using technology over and above the framingham risk algorithm to quantify his risk of cardiovascular events (whether expressed as coronary calcium or vascular age by carotid ultrasound). He then took the next step of getting onto broad spectrum anti-atherothrombotic combination therapy.

He and I have the same bad family history with multiple CAD/CVD/DM and bypasses on both sides of the family, which should be more than enough prompt for a patient to seek screening. Whether you do it by CACS, TPA, CIMT, or the new Rasmussen score (available to denizens of Minnesota) it probably doesn't matter - just DO IT (like the Nike commercial says). As in the case of cancer screening, we know that the therapeutic outcome works - increased use of plaque-modifying disease-modifying therapies.

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Hypertension
Hypertension
Jan 26, 2009 02:00 EST
Join Drs Ward, Grégoire, and McFarlane as they detail the role of ARB therapy and combination therapy in rapid blood pressure reduction and review the clinical trial data related to the efficacy of the available ARB agents.