Prevention
EUROASPIRE III: Not enough being done in the treatment of high-risk primary-prevention patients
September 3, 2008 | Michael O'Riordan

Munich, Germany - High-risk individuals in primary-prevention programs are not being managed effectively, with too few of these patients following the European guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and more than 80% never having received any advice or direction about the importance of following a heart-healthy lifestyle program.

These are the results of the primary-prevention EUROASPIRE III study, a survey of 12 participating countries that was designed to assess lifestyle, risk-factor, and therapeutic management of individuals at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease.

Dr David Wood

"The lifestyle of high-risk patients is a major cause for concern, with high prevalences of persistent smoking and both obesity and central obesity," said lead investigator Dr David Wood (Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK). "Blood-pressure, lipid, and glucose control are completely inadequate, with most patients not achieving the targets defined in the guidelines."

Presenting the results of EUROASPIRE III here at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2008, Wood said that even among patients with diabetes mellitus, many are not achieving blood-pressure control, and the use of other cardioprotective drugs are not prescribed enough. Ironically, many patients want to be informed about their risk of heart disease, he said. Unfortunately, most being treated believe they are low or moderate risk and falsely assume they have an equivalent risk when compared with others of the same age and sex.


Bad news for the primary-prevention patient at high risk

The first EUROASPIRE survey, which was done among patients with established coronary heart disease, showed that there was a substantial potential for risk reduction. Subsequent surveys drawn from the same countries multiple years later, however, indicate the potential for risk reduction had been missed, as many heart-disease patients continue to smoke, are still overweight, and have uncontrolled blood-pressure and cholesterol levels.

These new EUROASPIRE findings now suggest that primary-prevention patients are also drastically undertreated, as well as not adhering to lifestyles that promote cardiovascular health. The investigators studied the medical records of 5687 individuals and conducted interviews in more than 75% of these high-risk patients. High-risk patients are defined as men and women 80 years of age and younger without a history of coronary or other atherosclerotic disease who had been started on one or more of the following: antihypertensive therapy, lipid-lowering drugs, and/or diabetes therapies.

In terms of lifestyle, 16% of patients smoked, with nearly 90% of patients continuing to smoke at the time of the EUROASPIRE interview, a disappointing finding showing that only 1 in 10 patients had quit. Almost 50% of patients were overweight, and in terms of the prevalence of elevated risk factors, almost 80% had blood-pressure, triglyceride, and LDL-cholesterol levels exceeding the recommended European targets. Among diabetic patients, only 27% had fasting glucose levels and 53% had HbA1c levels that met the definition for therapeutic control. The prescription of cardioprotective drugs, including statins, was also underprescribed, report investigators.

Importantly, Wood told the audience that almost 85% of patients wanted to know their risk of heart disease, but very few knew their 10-year risk of developing coronary heart disease, and most assumed they were as healthy as men and women of their own age. More than 80% of those participating in the survey were not provided with a professional lifestyle and risk-factor management program, despite ample evidence that such programs, including the EUROACTION nurse-led multidisciplinary approach, improve lifestyles and patient care and reduce the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors.


Not doing enough

Dr Lars Rydén

Speaking to the audience following the EUROASPIRE III presentation, Dr Lars Rydén (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden) said that these patients represent a high-risk group of patients and that the real-world data are likely much worse, as the centers participating in the EUROASPIRE studies include active investigators and dedicated clinicians.

Interestingly, there had been some belief that patients would not want to know if they were going to die prematurely, said Rydén, although this does not appear to be the case. "The vast majority of patients actually wanted to know about their risk, but their [self-] estimated risk was considerably lower, so they are living with the false assumption that they will live forever," he said.

Rydén said it is disappointing that patients are not getting advice about managing risk factors through lifestyle modifications and that clinicians have the ability to do better, especially since the ESC guidelines are available in all European languages. He also emphasized the findings from the EUROACTION investigators and suggested that multidisciplinary efforts can effectively alter patient behavior and modify risk factors. Reimbursement for interventions aimed at primary-prevention patients also needs to be altered for these efforts to be effective, said Rydén.

AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Merck/Schering-Plough, and Novartis all contributed funding to the EUROASPIRE studies.



Your comments
EUROASPIRE III: Not enough being done in the treatment of high-risk primary-prevention patients
# 1 of 5
September 3, 2008 06:03 (EDT)
Michael Cobble, M.D.
is it hard to inspire?
Time and time again - we see people not being rewarded for lifestyle changes. we see people continue not to achieve bp, lipid and glucose goals. we see people want to KNOW their 10 year risk (yet some educational experts discourage this). we don't see an organized incentive by insurance companies or country health policies to reduce risk through lifestyle and evidence medicine. When patients start demanding to know their 10 year and 30 year risk calculations, when patients start demanding to know their risk category, when patients start demanding the optimal care available (not high tech, just the lifestyle goals and the lipid, bp and glucose goals) and achieve this within 6 months - we'll see less events and less $$ spent on interventions after or during the event.

Our local mgd care insurance company has been advertising their cardiologists perform more cardiac procedures than any other group in town (of course they have control in the ED and patient care outpt and inpt). After hearing this new ad for the last 4 weeks, I finally thought - well perhaps if they promoted better lifestyle mgmt, better bp/lipid/glucose/antiplatelet goal achievement, better risk assessment, better prevention - PERHAPS they wouldn't DO the MOST cardiac procedures in town. Now that's a thought. :o)
# 2 of 5
September 4, 2008 08:10 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
Depends on where you live. I hope the cathing for dollars era has closed post Courage
There may be a word of truth in that Mike, though You would also have to look at places that are endemic to tobacco use and obesity *Kentucky reigns King of all obesity stats in America!!! and the highest smoking rates!!! (WAY TO GO!!). So, I'd say in those towns, they are probably much like our group who just keep doing those that fall down with an MI, scoop them up, tell them what to do and watch them spend their medication money on cigarettes and french fries. Though, I'll have to say, we are making a dent by just sitting down and talking to the patient with a few visual aids.I do believe folks are become more interested in their health to the point that some days, I walk on air, others......I'm thinking of starting prozac.......on myself!!
Melissa
# 3 of 5
September 4, 2008 06:36 (EDT)
Michael Cobble, M.D.
where you live
Agreed, you definately live in the 'cardiac corridor'. The two major reasons patients didn't stay compliant were:
1. My clinician didn't tell me how important this medication (or lifestyle change) was.
2. My clinician didn't tell me how long I needed to take this medication.

If you decide to go with prozac or fluoxetine (make sure to dble the latter if not effective). We found a lot of variablity with generic agents which we could overcome by using higher doses. :o)
# 4 of 5
September 5, 2008 08:44 (EDT)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
: )
Thanks Mike!
I'll keep that in mind and certainly will ask for your direction when it comes to those issues too!
Melissa
# 5 of 5
September 27, 2008 01:39 (EDT)
Wiliam Blanchet
Not enough being done in the treatment of intermediate and low risk patients either.
Considering the fact that high risk patients account for about 10% of heart attacks, we need to also focus on the inadequate treatment of intermediate risk patients which constitute a little over 30% of heart attacks and low risk patients which constitute almost 60% of heart attacks.

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Latest 5 articles from Prevention
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Prevention
Prevention
Oct 10, 2008 10:10 EDT
Can we prevent the microvascular complications from developing and worsening in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes? Join Drs Sheldon Tobe, David Lau, and Bernard Zinman as they discuss new data from EASD 2008.