Acute Coronary Syndromes
MI reduction after smoking ban is sustained over long term
January 7, 2009 | Sue Hughes

Pueblo, CO - The reduction in MI hospitalizations observed after a smoke-free law takes effect appears to be sustained over an extended period, according to a new study from Pueblo, CO [1].

The study, reported in the January 2, 2009 issue of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, examined MI hospitalization rates before and after the implementation of a municipal law in the city of Pueblo making workplaces and public places smoke-free.

Results showed that MI hospitalizations for city residents decreased by 27% in the initial 18-month period (phase 1) after the smoke-free law came into effect on July 1, 2003. In addition, MI hospitalizations decreased by a further 19% during the following 18 months—through to June 30, 2006 (the phase 2 period).

AMI hospitalizations per 100 000 person-years in Pueblo, CO

18 mo before smoke-free law
1st 18 mo after smoke-free law
2nd 18 mo after smoke-free law
257
187
152

To download table as a slide, click on slide logo above

No significant changes in MI hospitalizations were observed in two nearby comparison areas that did not have smoke-free laws in place before or during the study periods. "These findings suggest that smoke-free policies can result in reductions in AMI hospitalizations that are sustained over a three-year period and that these policies are important in preventing morbidity and mortality associated with heart disease," the CDC researchers write. "This effect likely is mediated through reduced second-hand-smoke exposure among nonsmokers and reduced smoking, with the former making the larger contribution," they add.

Data on MI hospitalizations were drawn from electronic Colorado Hospital Association administrative data. These data included admission date, primary diagnosis code, sex, age, residential zip code, and hospital name. No other patient-level data, including smoking status, were available. To examine whether the MI-rate change could be attributable to preexisting secular trends, the researchers looked at MI rates for all three sites for three 18-month periods preceding the preimplementation phase and found no statistically significant secular trend.

To ensure that the rate change was not attributable to undercounting fatal MIs postimplementation, the researchers obtained the number of MI deaths for the city. After accounting for MI deaths by assuming that all fatal MIs occurred in patients who failed to reach the hospital and adding these numbers to the hospital MI admission data, the researchers found that the relative risk for the city of Pueblo was still statistically significant, at 0.82 from the phase 2 to phase 1 postimplementation periods and at 0.66 from phase 2 postimplementation to the preimplementation period.

An editorial note points out that in addition to reducing smoking in public places, smoke-free laws are associated with increased adoption of no-smoking rules in private homes and have also been found to prompt some smokers to quit smoking. It suggests that the continued decrease in MI hospitalizations observed in this study might be a result of a combination of the reduction in second-hand-smoke exposure among nonsmokers in public places, further reductions in second-hand-smoke exposure from more smoke-free homes over time, and more smokers quitting as a result of the smoke-free law and associated changes in social acceptance.

The authors note that in addition to this study, eight other published studies have reported that smoke-free laws were associated with rapid, considerable reductions in hospitalizations for MI. But they add, "The current study adds to the previous evidence by documenting this effect in a relatively large population and by demonstrating that the effect was sustained over an extended period." A meta-analysis of seven of the previous eight studies and one unpublished study yielded a collective estimate of a 19% reduction in MI hospitalization rates after implementation of smoke-free laws, and three studies have suggested that these reductions are more pronounced among nonsmokers than among smokers, they report.

"These findings provide support for considering smoke-free policies an important component of interventions to prevent heart-disease morbidity and mortality," the authors conclude.

Source
  1. Alsever RN, Thomas WM, Nevin-Woods C, et al. Reduced hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction after implementation of a smoke-free ordinance—-City of Pueblo, Colorado, 2002-2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009; 57; 1373-1377. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm5751.pdf.



Your comments
MI reduction after smoking ban is sustained over long term
# 1 of 3
January 7, 2009 09:48 (EST)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
Oh , but it's the business owner's right to choose to increase your local AMI rates !
Very impressive. Those folks in two South Central Kentucky towns who are in opposition to a healthier environment would certainly have a difficult time attributing this to a fluke. In some instances, however, they plainly state that they don't care because........
"It's the business owner's right to choose".
There has never been a greater misuse of the word "democracy" than that statement.
Melissa
# 2 of 3
January 8, 2009 09:34 (EST)
Kenneth Robertson
Celebrate the Data, Question the Conclusions
I'm a big fan of smoking bans, so don't get me wrong here.
It's possible that I missed something in the MMWR paper, but some data are unavailable to the reader:
a)were the patients with MI in each group smokers, non-smokers, or a mix of both?
b) Did the number of smokers residing in each locale remain stable, or did smokers move out of the catchment area because of the smoking ban?
c) Were other factors involved, i.e. changes in catchment area demographics (population age shift, economic shift, change in professional makeup, etc,) or were there substantial changes in employee health policies or insurance carriers within the catchmnent area, that could explain or impact the MI rate?
Seems to me these facts would need to be known/reported in the paper before the researchers could convince readers of a 'certain association' between the obvious and laudable reduction in MI rates and removal of a supposed environmental cause, second-hand smoke.
In my part of the world, smokers have either moved out of catchment areas, or changed behaviors by frequenting establishments (bars/restaraunts) outside the smoking ban area that actually cater to smokers.
More information needed....
# 3 of 3
January 8, 2009 08:05 (EST)
Melissa Walton-Shirley
Headin' for Marlboro country?
Kenneth,
Though you make excellent points, the answers to which would certainly help with this data interpretation,
I don't think in all of the post ban studies, (including the 1st: Helena,) these confounding variables can be accounted for completely. It's more or less a population study.
On the other hand, I can't see folks relocating to another town just to be able to smoke more , because,........well, they are usually so impovershed from their habit that they can't afford it.
The same results were seen in Lexington Kentucky where ashtma admissions fell sharply when the smoking Ban was enacted in public buildings there. It is assumed that the reduction was from a decrease in 2nd hand smoke exposure as well, though one couldn't say for certain that it wasn't from more smokers quitting due to the inconvenience.
None the less, it's now a frequently reproduced result, and I don't think it's from folks packing up and getting out of Dodge....or.....heading to Marlboro Country.
Melissa

You have to be logged in to add a comment to this article
Login
Username 
Password 
  Forgot your password?
 
Remember me on this computer
 
Join theheart.org community
Five reasons to become a member of the most trusted source of cardiology news:
1Be part of the conversation in our blogs and discussion forum
2Share your thoughts on our news or educational programs
3Receive exclusive newsletters related to your field of interest
4Access unique continuous medical education content
5See and read what leaders have to say about cardiology today
It is free and it only takes five minutes to join!
 
button
Previews
Featured CME
Inside: Acute Coronary Syndromes
Acute Coronary Syndromes
Jun 22, 2009 00:07 EDT
Early-ACS, HORIZONS-AMI, On-TIME 2... How do you use GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in contemporary practice? Given the continued uncertainty regarding the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy, what do you do for AF patients on warfarin who need stents? Answer our 3 short polling questions and learn your peers' responses.
Acute Coronary Syndromes
Jun 12, 2009 15:10 EDT
Studies suggest that major bleeding is associated with a 5-fold increase in the risk for death among ACS patients. Join our expert panel: Profs. Hamm, Kristensen, and Spaulding as they discuss treatment options and strategies to reduce bleeding in STEMI patients.