Topol and Teirstein: The Click and Rub Show
View all posts »#12: Are patients best served by reporting, transparency, and appropriate-use criteria?
Oct 30, 2012 16:05 EDT-
1Comments
-
Read later
Recent ruminations on public reporting (of PCI) generally conclude with the notion that patient outcomes are better in states that report. Right? Not according to Dr Paul Teirstein, who offers his cath-lab experience in California and New York to present his case. Will Dr Eric Topol be persuaded?
See also:
Joynt K, Blumenthal D, Orav EJ, et al. Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2012; 308:1460-1468. Abstract.
Moscucci M. Public reporting of PCI outcomes and quality of care: One step forward and new questions raised. JAMA 2012; 308:1478-1479. Abstract.
Ko TK, Guo H, Wijeysundera HC, et al. Assessing the association of appropriateness of coronary revascularization and clinical outcomes for patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:1876-1884. Abstract.
Digital data paves the way to transparency in medicine
Public reporting reduces PCI rates in AMI patients
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.
Membership is free!












