Fellows' corner

View all posts »

Episode #11: Transradial access for PCI with Drs David Kandzari, Sunil Rao, and Philippe Généreux

Jun 26, 2009 13:15 EDT


Drs David Kandzari and Sunil Rao join Dr Philippe Généreux to discuss the reasons for using transradial access and the situations best suited for it. From the fellow just starting out through to the most seasoned interventionalist who is more accustomed to transfemoral access, what are the ways to address the learning curve associated with this procedure, and what does it take to be successful and comfortable with it?

Join this informative discussion and learn helpful "tips and tricks" and valuable data supporting the adoption of transradial access as the default approach for PCI.



« Previous Post
Episode #12: Career development: The ABCDE's of following the path that fits best with Drs Roger Blumenthal and Mike Blaha
Oct 5, 2009 14:15 EDT Next post »
Episode #10: Biomarkers of heart failure with Jim Januzzi
May 19, 2009 11:00 EDT



Your comments
Episode #11: Transradial access for PCI with Drs David Kandzari, Sunil Rao, and Philippe Généreux
# 1 of 4
July 13, 2009 03:42 (EDT)
Mehrdad Saririan
Excellent program. 
# 2 of 4
August 4, 2009 07:56 (EDT)
Carolyn Thomas

I wish this discussion were required listening for all interventional cardiologists!

 I am a heart attack survivor; I had a stent implanted, 99% occluded LAD, May 6/08 by Dr. David Hilton in Victoria, BC Canada using trans radial access.  This appears to be the default access method here.

 I was able to walk around within an hour of being transferred back to CCU, and was home by that evening. No issues at all with bleeding, discomfort or complications after discharge from hospital. My right arm was put in a simple sling for 2-3 days, just to remind myself not to pick up anything heavy with that hand for the first while.

Five months after my heart attack, I attended the 'WomenHeart Science & Leadership Symposium for Women with Heart Disease' at Mayo Clinic in Rochester - the first Canadian ever invited to attend this annual five-day Symposium.  Out of the 45 heart attack survivors attending (women from all over the U.S. - except for me) I was the only one who had had a stent procedure done via radial access.  I heard many disturbing and distressing stories at Mayo, however, of severe complications from their femoral access angios ranging from excessive bleeding, infections, swelling, to extreme bruising and pain, or inability to get out of bed in some cases for a full day following the angio, etc. They couldn't believe it when I shared my radial access story.  Not one woman attending our Mayo Symposium had even heard of this procedure being done in her home community. This was not surprising, given the low 2-3% radial access procedure rate you mention!

There is another important advantage to radial access that was not mentioned by your panel: radial access can reduce costly hospital stays compared to femoral access.  In our own hospital, standard practice seems to be same day discharge post-radial angio.  This is not only great for us patients, but extremely cost-effective for hospital budgets.  I knew nothing of this at the time of course - I was just anxious to go home and sleep in my own bed, and I could almost tapdance out the hospital door!

Thanks so much for a very interesting discussion.  For your patients' sake, I hope radial access will become as common in your country as it is here.

Carolyn Thomas

http://www.myheartsisters.org  

  
# 3 of 4
August 11, 2009 07:11 (EDT)
Charlie

This is pretty interesting. What were you thinking going into this procedure? Are you happy they took the that route? <a href="http://www.ecommunity.com/cardiovascular/">Angioplasty</a>

# 4 of 4
August 25, 2009 09:55 (EDT)
uweny

Radial acess exposes the investigator to a much higher exposure rate to radiation - a higher risk of thrombosis of the atery - 5 max 6 F bares a higher risk of atery closure

the femoral atery is the better approach

- bleeding complication have to graded, no every bleeding is the same and the closure of the acess with e.g. angioseal is excellent - and mobilisation is not bad - the femoral approach is chossen in the light of pushing for a more ambulatory one day few hours investigation and money saving because of less postprocedure montorisation in beds....


You must be a member (with full membership) to post a comment.
Already a member?
Enter your login information below:
 Remember me on this computer
Forgot your username and/or password?
        Login        
Enjoy all the benefits of theheart.org

With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.

Membership is free!

    Join now for full access    
About The Fellows' Corner
The Fellows' corner on theheart.org radio offers fellow conducted interviews of thought leaders on a wide range of topics such as training, research, career planning, and the daily dilemmas encountered by the cardiovascular physician. Available for download on theheart.org and through iTunes, our podcasts are anecdotal learning tools and words of wisdom from some of our most valued cardiovascular professionals.

If you are a cardiovascular fellow and would like to participate in our series, contact us at info@theheart.org