Mayo Clinic Talks

View all posts »

#11: Controversies in ICD implantation

Jul 25, 2012 16:00 EDT


Despite a significant body of trial data supporting the implantation of ICDs for secondary and primary prevention, controversies persist. Dr Paul Friedman joins Dr Bernard Gersh to discuss the issues that cloud patient selection and how to cope with ICD lead malfunction. They also review the future of subcutaneous lead-based ICD systems and how devices will be improved by new designs and technology.

See also:

 

Dr Friedman has received research support from Medtronic (grant administered by Mayo Clinic for investigator-initiated study). He has served as a speaker at an educational event that received industry support from St Jude and Biotronik.

Dr Gersh has no relevant financial disclosures.








Your comments
#11: Controversies in ICD implantation
# 1 of 1
July 27, 2012 04:54 (EDT)
michael hanna
this was excllent discuusion.what should have been emphasized the importance of optimal medical therapy particularly BB of at least 3 months duration ,repeat EF 3 month after target dose of BB and then make decision .it is often not done in the real world.

You must be a member (with full membership) to post a comment.
Already a member?
Enter your login information below:
 Remember me on this computer
Enjoy all the benefits of theheart.org

With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.

Membership is free!

About Mayo Clinic Talks
Mayo Clinic in collaboration with theheart.org brings you context to the latest news, trials, and trends in cardiovascular medicine. Catch up on the latest in cardiology with Dr Bernard Gersh and his guests.