Heartfelt with Dr Melissa Walton-Shirley

View all posts »

Cardiologists' mantra for the New Year: "Bite me, 2010! Bring on 2011! and take back the attention and accolades we deserve"

Jan 8, 2011 09:46 EST


The year 2010 was a most humbling one for cardiologists. Although I'm tempted to discard last year and sum it all up by borrowing the phrase from a Facebook friend, "Bite me, 2010," we can probably better utilize last year as a navigation tool for the next one. Rather than ignoring the past 12 months' worth of revelations, forecasts, and accusations, we should take lemons and make lemonade or better yet, take lemons and make a Jamba Juice of a year in 2011! Here are just a few reflections and observations about what happened to us in 2010. Instead of the threat of a 30% reimbursement cut, we should have had accolades, so I'm going to do what should have been done by the likes of our politicians, our President Obama, and some of our hospital CEOs.

As many of you familiar with our forum can attest, cardiologists became a favorite punching bag last year for mainstream medicine haters and some politicians and has been largely ignored by our president. Mr Obama placed his stamp of approval on a 1600-page healthcare reform bill in which family medicine, trauma docs, and obstetricians were given a nod, but the word "cardiologist" was never mentioned a single time in the entire Tolkienesque piece. This is an incredible omission despite the fact that congestive heart failure is our country's most expensive DRG and heart disease is the number-one killer of our citizens.

Heart specialists were accused in 2010 of driving up the cost of healthcare. My answer to that is, "Live patients are more expensive than dead ones." Heart attack rates are lower, better medications prolong the lives of heart failure sufferers, so we have more folks alive to take care of and we as a nation need to learn to deal with that. Thanks to our EPs, devices save sudden death candidates. Heart-attack mortality is decreased by primary PCI and the guys who get up at 2 am to provide this service need to be rewarded like Michael Jordan rather than be made to feel like lepers. Although it's far more spectacular to point a finger and generate a headline suggesting some sort of espionage or graft, the simple truth is that folks who are purely stenting for dollars are few and far between. Relieving angina with a stent is not a crime and though not lifesaving in the stable-patient, any politician or "PCI hater" who has to take a nitro to have sex with his wife or take out the trash will be the first one on the table.
Noninvasivists need a pat on the back too. Screening for dyslipidemia, management of hypertension, and imaging to prove that chest pain is angina (or not) has progressed light years in a half a century. Although it only takes a few minutes to interpret an echo, it took 25 years of education to be able to read one, so America, stop cutting the reimbursement for it. Let us misinterpret one and you'll quickly tell us the worth of that test in a malpractice case. RNPs and PAs provide patient accessibility in many practices that is lifesaving. They deserve our thanks as well.

The family doctor who delivered me died at a young age in a cardiologist's office in the early 1960s. He had suffered from progressive angina for weeks and was told that nothing could really be done about it. As he was tying his tie, he stepped down off the exam table and suffered a witnessed sudden cardiac death. With no cath/stent/CABG, CPR, or defibrillator available, all that could be done was to inform his family of his demise. Think how far we have come before we complain in 2011 about the status of cardiac services.

As cardiologists, it's time we start bragging about our successes. We all need to renew our pride in being a cardiologist. It took grit, determination, and intelligence to complete a residency and fellowship and establish a practice. We take unmitigated amounts of malpractice risk to help surgeries get done and allow discharges to happen, and most of the time, we just do it because we enjoy it, we are good at it, and it comes naturally. However, we should NOT just leave it at that. Cardiologists should make a few plans and a few demands in 2011. Let's improve on our weaknesses and optimize our strengths.

If there are those among us who are behaving in an unethical or fraudulent fashion, we owe it to our profession to confront them and, if it's a pattern, report them. We owe it to our patients to shore up our practices and make them as efficient and financially sound as possible. Utilize consulting firms, make our payrolls lean; deal with patients in a fair and humane manner. Reconsider the "money up front" stance and replace it with a more patient-friendly payment plan option. Demand attention from our congressional representatives and senators and take time to sit down and discuss our thoughts on healthcare reform and healthcare delivery. Emphasize the importance of prevention in our everyday practices and in the political arena. Become a leader in entities like smoke-free-ordinance movements, previously owned medication repositories, health fairs, and public forums, and generally make it easier to get cardiovascular information and services to our local communities. Champion antiobesity campaigns and focus on fitness.

We took a beating last year, and instead of just lying down and taking a 30% pay cut we should instead demand tort reform, primary PCI availability, a smoke-free nation, and tax breaks for citizens who maintain a healthy lifestyle and businesses who encourage it for their employees. In these few changes, we could find enough cash to fund the very essential prevention movement that is the ultimate gift that keeps on giving, the benefits of which would be affordable healthcare for everyone. Prevention is the veritable Fort Knox of healthcare dollars. This year the walls need to come down, and with that, there would be enough cash that every single physician could receive a pay increase that matches that given to our hospitals. Hospitals, by the way, are becoming top heavy by purchasing more and more properties, physicians, and buildings. They are unwittingly being set up by our government for the same failures that plague our current cardiology private-practice sectors, which feel their rugs being jerked out from under them by government that has forgotten their worth.

I don't know about you, but I think it's time for cardiologists to stick our chests out and hold our heads up high. Our profession has nothing to be ashamed of. We should all stand together and in unison yell "Bite me, 2010" and bring on 2011! Demand the political attention and accolades we deserve. Let's continue to do our part this year as cardiologists, but let's also take our part and stand our ground as well. 








Your comments
Cardiologists' mantra for the New Year: "Bite me, 2010! Bring on 2011! and take back the attention and accolades we deserve"
# 1 of 15
January 10, 2011 08:40 (EST)
Julie
Bravo!!!  Well said!  I am one of the lucky ones that had a cardiologist that cared about meu and used his extensive training to save my life, twice!  America, quit beating up all the docs for the sins of a few!  I, for one, am eternally grateful that my cardiologist identified my chest pain and quickly, efficiently provided a heart cath and angioplasty that prevented future damage and gave me back a quality of life!  Thanks so much!
# 2 of 15
January 14, 2011 01:23 (EST)
Claire Blocker

Ditto!! to Julie's comment, I too am one of the lucky ones that had a preventive cardiology team that cared enough to have kept me alive and help me to find a quality life the past thirteen years since by CABG4 at 51.  As the daughter of a general practioner who healed others in the 50's & 60's, I understand the importance of a medical home for patients. Cardiologists both interventional and preventional need take be proud of the work that they do to give patients a second chance to live a healthier lifestyle and live a longer more producive life. I am grateful for the opportunity to embrace the frailties of my physical being and to use the expertise and knowledge that  my caridologist has been willing to share with me. I will be 64 at the end of this month; thank you to all of you who have helped so many of us.

Claire Blocker, President                                                                            HeartBright Foundation                                                                                   

 

 

# 3 of 15
January 14, 2011 01:36 (EST)
Diane
Amen!!! I am a "well-seasoned" cath lab nurse with several years of ICU and PCU experience preceding my cath lab years. I know from a very up-close-and-personal perspective how demanding, both on a professional and personal level, it is to be a cardiologist. These hard-working physicians and their specialty have taken a beating this past year, but I beleive the attitude you are taking is the correct and productive one. Thanks for speaking up! I pray that our nation's cardiologists can keep a positive outlook going forward and I want them to realize their individual and collective worth to our country. I have always been and remain proud to serve our patients alongside my local cardiologists. Thank you!
# 4 of 15
January 14, 2011 03:20 (EST)
ssaith
...how do we do 'more than just talk'?
# 5 of 15
January 14, 2011 03:57 (EST)
RMF

Dear Dr. Walton-Shirley,

This is the year to take back medicine and in our case, Nuclear Cardiology.  While the Government continues to try to tell those of us trained in Medicine, what to bill for and how; this will be the year we show them how we do it "downtown."  It's time the Government quit attaching our collegues and let us worry about when and how to do something.  RMF

# 6 of 15
January 17, 2011 08:20 (EST)
Melissa

Diane,

thanks so much! I know your cardiologist colleagues must really appreciate you! I appreciate your post. 

Ssaith, We must approach it in a multi-pronged fashion:  Inform the public by utilizing local media outlets.  Make appointments to discuss the issues with your local congressmen and women. Discussion + dedication = attention.

Melissa

# 7 of 15
January 17, 2011 08:26 (EST)
Eric Tiblier

Dear Melissa,

   Rock on!   I'm a private solo cardiologist in Texas and I have seen over 1/2 of the cardiologists in town become employees because of the threats of cutting reimbursement and hospitals throwing their weight around trying to get marketshare with doctors and patients.   Someone needs to tell these "Non-Profit" religious-affiliated hospitals that high quality,  compassionate care for patients is supposed to be the primary goal and mission.  These hospitals are flush with cash and are more concerned about dominating healthcare than serving patiients in the community.    As you clearly point out, I have had to become extremely efficient while maintaing excellent service to our patients and the referring doctors.  You have the most compelling blog representing cardiologists and doctors.  You are are a "rock" and I hope you continue to lead the way with your message which always seems to be right on point.

EST

# 8 of 15
January 18, 2011 06:47 (EST)
Melissa

Eric,

Thanks so much for reading and thanks for the encouragement as well.  Hold fast! I think the private sector will be better off in the long run.  I am acutely aware of the risk that many private physicians can incur when they come under the auspices of someone who is not adept at navigating the very rocky economics and demographics of a  medical environment. If one utilized a cookie cutter approach to running a hospital and uses a template for a tertiary center to pattern their maneuvers for a smaller hospital, the community loses. At this point, there have been many atrocities committed against private practice communities of physicians.  When derision and division are instigated, everyone loses but most especially the patients.  

Keep up the faith! Hope you have a FANTASTIC year in practice!

Melissa

# 9 of 15
January 20, 2011 02:13 (EST)
mervyn gornitsky
I enjoy reading your blog. I am having a discussion with members of the hospital staff as to wether the incidence of CABG surgery is increasing at present 2010-11 in relation to stenting for coronary artery disease. Up to now  I was lead to believe that for the greater number of these patients, stenting was the preferred treatment for up to 3 vessel disease. If this is so, can you give me the reasons for the increased need for CABG surgery
# 10 of 15
January 20, 2011 02:23 (EST)
Bryan

As the Clinical Coordinator for Pharmacy at a 300 bed hospital I know all to well the good, bad and ugly of our health care system. The point that you make that I bet will get overlooked/underappriciated by most readers is  "Become a leader in entities like smoke-free-ordinance movements, previously owned medication repositories, health fairs, and public forums, and generally make it easier to get cardiovascular information and services to our local communities. Champion antiobesity campaigns and focus on fitness" As a 47 yo male that has completed several marathons and a few Ironman triathalons I have made fitness the cornerstone of my own health. As a Pharmacist I get a very global view of sick people and lack of fitness is ubiquitous. I think that ALL practioners within healthcare have to do a better job promoting healthy living rather than continuing to just increase doses or add another drug. The vast majority of the people that work at this hospital could not pass a basic physical fitness test. How can we expect our patients to heed the "diet and excercise" advice when the person giving it is 50 lbs over weight themselves? What kind of message are sending to our COPD/cardiac patients by having a smoking area on hospital property? For a group(heathcare workers) that is supposed to be so smart, we sure have done a lot of dumb things.

 

# 11 of 15
January 20, 2011 10:43 (EST)
Melissa

Mervyn,

Without knowing the structure or recent changes in structure of your program I can't really answer with certain accuracy, but there are potentially multiple factors that can impact the number of bypasses performed at an institution. It could simply be that a new surgeon is available who increases referrals and procedures. The timing of new data release (some of which suggest that CABG is a more optimal choice for multivessel CAD in diabetics),  it can also have a transient or permament impact on referrals.  Glad you enjoy the Heartfelt series! Thanks for reading.

Bryan,

I completely agree. In South Central Kentucky, there is a constant parade of tobacco addicts who stil run to the cancer shack to run up the cost of their health care programs.....er.....to smoke I mean.  Though it's not as bad as it used to be because unfortunately, some of those folks whom I have loved over the years are certainly sickening and dying.  This "thinning of the herd" is a horrible end result of raising children in an area without a smoke free ordinance and with one of the  lowest tobacco tax rates in the country.

Congratulations to you for your dedication to health. If all Americans were like you, we'd be wondering what on earth to do with all the spare cash.......perhaps give it to folks who CAN NOT help themselves instead of folks who WILL NOT help themselves. 

Melissa

 

 

 

 

 

 

# 12 of 15
January 26, 2011 06:57 (EST)
Carolyn Thomas

Bryan, I agree with your excellent points as well.  As a Mayo Clinic-trained* heart attack survivor, women's health advocate, and frequent speaker on the subject of women and heart disease, I've been occasionally invited to do my Mayo presentations to health care professionals (in mental health, E.R., cardiology, etc).

When I was asked last fall to do a one-hour talk as part of the hospital's annual 'Cardiology Day' staff training, I told event organizers that, although I was thrilled to be invited to speak, by the time a heart patient gets brought upstairs to the Cardiology unit, the damage has already been done. Cardiologists see their patients for the first time long after the salient fact.

My audience on Cardiology Day included staff at our world-class Heart Institute (a solid educational and research reputation). But no matter how good our local cardiology team is, they are not miracle workers and cannot PREVENT the damage that patients have been self-inflicting, sometimes for decades. That's where Dr. Melissa's goal to "make it easier to get cardiovascular information and services to our local communities" comes in. That is my main focus during my own community presentations and on my HEART SISTERS blog - www.myheartsisters.org - these days.

But I am just one person, merely a patient who's survived a heart attack, and not a health care professional. I wish all docs (cardiologists included, whose credible voices in their home communities are heeded simply by virtue of the fact they wear the letters M.D. after their names) would join Bryan's challenge:  ".. ALL practitioners within healthcare have to do a better job promoting healthy living rather than continuing to just increase doses or add another drug..."

Thanks Dr. Melissa for this compelling essay - and good luck in 2011!

      * 7th Annual 'WomenHeart Science & Leadership Symposium For Women With Heart Disease' at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota - October 2008

# 13 of 15
April 10, 2011 10:55 (EDT)
Healthy Heart

I am a very successful solo cardiologist in Raleigh, NC. I enjoy my work and come home happy. However the past 12 months most of the cardiologists in the area (95% of them) were bought by the two major health systems. Without even realizing, I am constantly worried - will I be the loner and looser, if I do not make a move and joint them? Will I be left out in the field with an empty office not knowing what to do? I worked very hard all my life and I continue to do so. As many cardiologists, I am very self confident and believe in myself and a bit stubborn too. I consider myself a failure if I give up my autonomy and joint a hospital system. However I have to bend my head if I have to - as I have a family to feed and parents to take care of. Any one to relate to me and advise me ?

 

# 14 of 15
April 11, 2011 09:45 (EDT)
Melissa

Dear Healthy Heart,

Yours is a question that many are asking right about now. I just answered a comment on another blog with similar issues. I think the answer depends on a lot of things:

1.  Can you get cross coverage and particpate in call sharing? If not, staying solo will kill you. You can't work every weekend and every night so this issue is key.

2.  As long as you have a healthy practice and keep seeing your patients coming back, you it is a sign that you are surviving. 

3.  Can you trust your hospital administration to know how to navigate the current medical climate?  An acquaintance of mine was "bought" and is now being handed over to another "For profit" entity. Things are quite what he seemed. He's still on the hampster wheel and his extenders salaries are coming out of his pocket, so it was exactly the Land of Oz that he was told it would be.  

4. My partner always says it's important to remain autonomous. For now, we are still doing what we always do while the hospital army continues to be amassed.   The economy took a horrible downturn and it caused a lot of anxiety. Some had no choice but to close their doors to make a "deal with the devil" so they had to do what it took to remain in their communities. I feel the hospitals by and large took advantage of this downturn and in the long run, I am afraid they may be regretful of their new allegiance, especially if you are being "handled" by an inexperienced CEO or one that is not savvy, it can be disastrous.

5. IMHO, I think I'd only consider going in with a hospital personally if I were at the end of my career and didn't really care to deal with the day to day management of the office issues. However, you must do what is right for you, your family and your patients.  If you get the sense after 2-3 years that your friends have a better deal, you can always approach the hospital. I will warn you though that a neighboring town has already been there and done that and it seems the hospital nor the docs found the relationship to be what they thought it would be and disappointment abounds.  You might talk with those you trust and get the low down on it before you make any firm opinions.

GOOD LUCK! You seem like a caring person and a good doc and I wish the best for you. Please let know how it is going and what your decision making process entails.

Melissa

# 15 of 15
April 11, 2011 10:08 (EDT)
Seth Bilazarian

I agree with Mellisa's comments except for possibly point 2.  Physicians have always prided themselves on being ok if they take excellent care of patietns but that may not be the case inthe unknown future.

I would suggest referring to the recent NEJM article that being employed is not all its cracked up to beHospitals' Race to Employ Physicians — The Logic Behind a Money-Losing Proposition. 

Robert Kocher, M.D., and Nikhil R. Sahni, B.S.

March 30, 2011

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1101959  Here's my prediction for the future:I think how the ACO thing plays out is critical for guys like you– if you can join one then you will be ok  - if not no chance to remain independent and viable since all the patietns (and payers) will be directed away from you, unless they do something like concierge medicine 

We are considereing an educational session at ACC stay tuned.


You must be a member (with full membership) to post a comment.
Already a member?
Enter your login information below:
 Remember me on this computer
Enjoy all the benefits of theheart.org

With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.

Membership is free!

About Dr Melissa Walton-Shirley
Dr Walton-Shirley performs invasive cardiology, nuclear cardiology, and stress echocardiography in a private practice in Glasgow, KY.

Her chief medical interests are CHF/hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and the promotion of primary PCI for acute MI. Recently she played a significant role in helping to launch an ambitious pilot study of primary PCI in Kentucky, the Kentucky Primary Angioplasty Pilot Project. She has also participated in the TIMI 19, Duke-HF, NRMI, and CRUSADE trials and is proud to have been an advocate of the first smoke-free initiative in Kentucky (2011). She champions a smoke-free America.

Dr Walton-Shirley received her undergraduate degree at the University of Kentucky and went to medical school and did her residency and fellowship at the University of Louisville. She is married with two daughters. Her interests include singing, writing poetry and songs, fitness, and, of course, theheart.org.