Heartfelt with Dr Melissa Walton-Shirley

View all posts »

Casting call for cardiologists and citizens: Smoke-free ordinance "play" coming to a "theater" near you

Feb 1, 2011 09:45 EST


Theme: This piece is a tragicomedy. Townspeople both young and old are dying of smoke exposure. A group of concerned citizens has awakened their city council from their slumber on the topic of a public smoking ban. This one-act play involves all of the personalities and viewpoints on the subject. There are light-hearted moments as well as poignant statements that stir today's society.

Setting: City hall-–preferably two years before the next election

Bring three head shots: One for the local newspaper for a positive interview, one for the opposing paper with headlines screaming antipatriotism, and a third headshot to be used for a dartboard at the local "good ole boys" club. Wear comfortable clothing and expect to spend two hours debating the topic. The process will be repeated at the second reading two weeks later, and you are expected at both sessions.

City commission characters:

Mayor Jane: Female late 50s. Firmly confident in her support after two years of discussions backed by local polls currently at 70/30 in favor of an ordinance. She has her eye on loftier political goals and will be successful.

Commissioner Smith: A friendly kind male in his late 40s. He has a relative with asthma who "gets it" and is fully supportive. He smiles often except when he talks about his family member who has severe lung problems.

Commissioner Jackson: Male 70s. Smoked all his life. No one is aware he was discharged from the hospital this morning for exacerbation of COPD. Under the mistaken impression that businesses suffer if their "particulate matter counts" are low. Firmly against.

Commissioner Jones: Male late 60s. His best friend runs the bingo hall that regularly donates to charity. Wrongly convinced that the bingo hall will fold and all charities will go lacking if cigarette smoking is banned in public buildings. He is firmly "against" and unaware that the millions in healthcare expenditures to treat preventable illnesses could supply his charities for a millennium.

Commissioner Washington: Female early 50s, health-minded, intelligent, and a real community activist. The depths of inconsideration for public safety revealed at this meeting will be a shocking eye opener for her. Firmly in support.

Commissioner Bloke: Male, 50s. A "business-owner's-right-to-choose" person. Serving rotten food, using asbestos, or promoting a smoke-filled environment are all "A–okay as long as the "business owner chooses." Ironically expresses great concern about a shrub that has overgrown a local highway as a safety issue. He wants it cut down immediately.

City Commissioner Tremble: Has had numerous visits from both ordinance supporters and supporters of "business-owners'-rights" folks. He's not sure which way he'll vote. He just wants to be reelected.

Lay public characters:

Team of cardiologists, pulmonologists, family doctors, and pediatricians: These parts usually not filled because they are far "too busy" to make the council meetings. They figure they do their part by getting up nights and treating folks with first- and secondhand smoke exposure. We welcome any of these individuals to audition and promise a very worthwhile endeavor. We know you would be great!

Citizen Johnson: Speaks first. Male, 50s. Mom was a nonsmoker who passed away of lung cancer after working in a smoke-filled restaurant. Has spent two years campaigning for clean air. He speaks with conviction and is well received only by supporting council members. The opposing council members appear disinterested, yawn, and even grimace.

Citizen McCracken: Large man, around 6 ft 7 in. A veteran, 50s, who fought for the right to breathe smoke anywhere, even on a sick child. Tries to intimidate, insists on more time to speak than the three minutes given to everyone else. Nearly gets escorted out of the meeting by security. Turns off everyone who knows he's not the typical respectable veteran who deserves our appreciation of their great sacrifice.

Citizen Slagger: Female around 70 years of age. Coughs incessantly. Her voice has a sandpaper quality and her face is deeply etched by hours of smoking and drinking coffee at the local diner. She is fighting to preserve her recreation at the expense of the health of servers and other patrons.

Doctor Voist: Runs in a little late with no lunch or supper to speak on the ills of secondhand smoke exposure. Looks around the room and wonders where all the pediatricians, family doctors, and cardiologists are who should have ALL been on the front row supporting him. He is undeterred and staunch in his convictions.

Citizen Belton: Audience member who says nothing in public but jumps the lone physician as he exits the council chambers. He threatens bodily harm and taunts him all the way to his car for trying to save lives and healthcare dollars. Actually says "I ought to whip your @$$ all over this county" as the doctor goes out the door. (This is an actual quote from a meeting in Barren County, Kentucky.)

Citizen Danforth: A nonsmoker who believes we should just post a sign and let folks choose where to eat or work, ignoring the fact that this does not protect the employees and runs up the cost of healthcare.

Citizen Blithering: Disheveled in appearance. Believes alcohol is worse than smoking and speaks only long enough to insist we "outlaw booze and fat people first."

Mysterious citizen character: Carries a briefcase and wears a cheap suit. No one knows who he is or what he does but he says he works for an "institute" for "public policy solutions." He is "bought and paid for" by the tobacco industry. He has already cast the opposition behind the scenes and can count on ignorance and inconsideration to execute his agenda. Must have a sweaty upper lip and must smile even when there is nothing to smile about.

Extras: Openings for camera crew for television stations and local radio personalities available. Moms of kids with asthma who are not public speakers but willing to show up for support also needed. Local tobacco-coalition members wearing smoke-free T-shirts who have plans A, B, and C through Z to make certain this ordinance passes, if not now, later, are also welcome. Smokers are needed who groan and moan when ordinance supporters make logical and educated points but who must shake their heads "yes" on cue when "business-owners'-right-to-choose" people speak (but you'll have to step outside to smoke).

This traveling play has rolled through 30 states and hundreds of US cities. It is scheduled to play in 20 other states where thousands of workers and patrons are still suffering and dying of smoke exposure. Although it's always the same script with the same cast of characters, it's lively, entertaining, and well worth seeing. Better yet, why not show up and try out? If smoke-free legislation passes in your community, it will save more lives in a few years than in an entire lifetime of our medical practices. Pick up the phone and actively seek a roll in the next smoke-free ordinance "play" coming to a "theater" near you. As a physician and a citizen, it could be your best role yet.  








Your comments
Casting call for cardiologists and citizens: Smoke-free ordinance "play" coming to a "theater" near you
# 1 of 14
February 4, 2011 12:28 (EST)
harleyrider1778

Scientific Evidence Shows Secondhand Smoke Is No Danger

Written By: Jerome Arnett, Jr., M.D.
Published In: Environment & Climate News
Publication Date: July 1, 2008
Publisher:

http://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/23399/Scientific_Evidence_Shows_Secondhand_Smoke_Is_No_Danger.html

myth-of-second-hand-smoke

http://yourdoctorsorders.com/2009/01/the-myth-of-second-hand-smoke

BS Alert: The 'third-hand smoke' hoax

http://www.examiner.com/public-policy-in-louisville/bs-alert-the-third-hand-smoke-hoax?render=print

The thirdhand smoke scam

http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com/2010/02/thirdhand-smoke-scam.html

Heart attacks Frauds and Myths..

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7451/

New study: No evidence linking SHS and lung cancer

http://fightantismokertyranny.blogspot.com/2010/11/new-study-no-evidence-linking-shs-and.html

Surgeon General's Office Again Misrepresents and Distorts the Science in Report Press Release; Why the Need to Lie to the American Public?
 
 
http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2010_12_01_archive.html


And for your information, Regina Benjamin is on the Board of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, J&J's "philanthropic arm". She received a $500,000.00 grant    from the MacArthur Foundation 08, which I guess she has not returned! The Justice Department should be looking at her involvement and her pushing nicotine replacement for J&J! How she could have been named Surgeon General should be investigated as criminal!


B.S. Study: 600,000 People Die Worldwide From Secondhand Smoke Every Year

http://grendelreport.posterous.com/bs-study-600000-people-die-worldwide-from-sec

Green Hell Blog
How Environmentalists Plan to Control Your Life and What You Can Do to Stop Them
http://greenhellblog.com/2010/12/12/surgeon-general-jumps-the-shark/

Anti-Smoking Lie of the Year

http://reason.com/blog/2010/12/29/anti-smoking-lie-of-the-year#commentcontainer

Radon Gas No. 1 cause of lung cancer in non-smokers

http://www.indianasnewscenter.com/home/No-1-Cause-Of-Lung-Cancer-In-Non-Smokers-Many-Unaware-105130059.html

Lung cancer in smokers may be different from lung cancer in nonsmokers: Vancouver study
By PAMELA FAYERMAN, Vancouver Sun


Although doctors and scientists have suspected for some time that there were different biological mechanisms underlying lung cancers in smokers and non-smokers, the B.C. study is said to be the first to find whole regions of mutations.

 

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Lung+cancer+smokers+different+from+lung+cancer+nonsmokers


Anti-Smoking Researchers in California Admit that They Have Reached Pre-Determined Conclusions Prior to Their Research Studies

Acknowledged Purpose of Study is Not to Find Out Effects of Thirdhand Smoke, But to Promote Smoking Bans in the Home

While I have for some time argued that many anti-smoking researchers have reached pre-determined conclusions and that their research consists of cherry-picking findings so that they support these pre-determined conclusions, it is now the case that these researchers are readily admitting that they have no interest in seeing where the results of the research actually take them.

http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspo...

 

Read more: http://www.heraldonline.com/2011/01/19/2764164/restricting-outdoor-smoking.html#ixzz1BUD07KPu

# 2 of 14
February 4, 2011 02:11 (EST)
The Onion, you're not

I'm not sure if "The Last Smoker in America" was a successful theater piece or not, but there is always that copycat bandwagon mentailty concerning drama queens whether in the dressing room or in the airchair.

The good doctor must have a Mr. Hyde character hiding in the recesses of her mind to write such a synopisis.

# 3 of 14
February 4, 2011 05:51 (EST)
Michael J. McFadden

I actually wrote a similar play back when NYC was first debating a smoking ban in bars.  I don't know if the formatting will come through, but I hope you find it enjoyable in any event.

 ===

S.W.A.P.P.

  It’s a peaceful and fairly quiet night at the neighborhood bar.  Several regulars mix with a few wander-ins and the bartender keeps a wary eye for empty glasses.  Suddenly the front door slams open: Team of four S.W.A.P.P. (Smoking Without A Permit Police) officers march into the bar, all attired in coplike exaggerated uniforms with big hats and HUGE tin “Cigarette Police” badges. Captain BLOOMY blows his whistle.  Officer ODDBALL takes out a citation book.  Officer WATERS has his SuperSoaker at the ready.  Officer CUTTER waves a huge pair of scissors/garden shears in her hands. Sergeant KLINK has pairs of handcuffs on belt and in each hand.  =====  CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  This is a RAID!  Everybody FREEZE and put your HANDS IN THE AIR!! CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  (Walking up to first smoker at the bar.)  Sir, I regret to inform you that you are in violation of the Crisply Clean New York Air Ordinance.  Please put out your cigarette immediately.  Officer ODDBALL! Give this man a ticket: $1,000 just like in California! SIR:   (Gulps, looks down, nervous and guilty while putting out his cigarette.) OFFICER ODDBALL:   (Comes over and starts writing ticket.)   SIR:  (Looks up, his eyes hardening, and says loudly…) But Officer, this is America! CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  (Glares) Sergeant KLINK!  Arrest this man!  He’s inciting a riot! (KLINK slams man’s head on the bar while expertly applying cuffs.) CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  (walks up to female smoker at the bar) Young Lady, how can you sit there and spew pollution into the clean fresh air of our city like that? YOUNG LADY:   (Squeaks, mumbles.) CAPTAIN BLOOMY: Aren’t you concerned about the example you’re setting for the CHILDREN?  (Gesturing around…) YOUNG LADY:   But … but officer, this is a bar.  There ARE no children! CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  Nonsense!  Everyone knows that the tobacco companies put cigarette machines in bars so that every day thousands of school children will flock into the taverns to buy cigarettes!  I certainly hope you’re not a MOTHER! YOUNG LADY:  er…  Actually, I have two sons officer. CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  WHAT???  Sergeant KLINK! Place this woman under arrest for child abuse and see that her children are taken and given to a God fearing non-smoking couple!  (KLINK slaps cuffs on woman.) CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  (Accosts woman sitting at a table with an ashtray on it. Picks up ashtray and ostentatiously smells butt in it.)  Madam, this cigarette is OBVIOUSLY yours, or you wouldn’t be SITTING near the repulsive thing!  Officer ODDBALLl! Write her a ticket and take her into the back room for a full body search for cigarettes! (At this point another woman sitting at the bar screams, clapping her hands to her face in obvious terror.  As her scream dies she tremblingly points across the bar at a man who’d been concentrating on a TV ball game and who has JUST lit the cigarette in his mouth. He is still holding the lit match.)  WOMAN: That… That… *MAN*!  He just LIT A CIGARETTE!!! (She then collapses on the bar.) MAN: (After a shocked second the man hastily waves out the match.  The cigarette, lit, is still in his mouth.) CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  SIR!  You are under arrest for assault with a DEADLY WEAPON!   Officer CUTTER, Disarm the suspect!! OFFICER CUTTER: (Strides over with her garden shears and cuts the cigarette in half.)   OFFICER WATERS: (Runs over and squirts the cigarette <and the man> thoroughly with SuperSoaker) CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  Sergeant KLINK! Handcuff this man! (KLINK does.) CAPTAIN BLOOMY: Looks around the bar in satisfaction and accosts the bartender (who himself sneakily puts his own cigarette and ashtray under the bar as he’s approached by the unseeing officer.) CAPTAIN BLOOMY: There now, the Smoking Without A Permit Police have saved you from these smokers!  Aren’t you happy?  They’ll never come back to trouble you again. BARTENDER: (Stammers, obviously fearful) Oh…er…yes!  Thank you Officer!  But what will my boss say? CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  Don’t worry, he’ll be grateful to us too for improving his business.  By the way, here’s the total fine for the bar: 27 smokers at $1,000 apiece, plus a $5,000 bonus for the bar. $32,000 just like California.  Remember, as a conscript of the New American AntiSmoking State, YOU are responsible for enforcing the law in here!  CAPTAIN BLOOMY:  (Looks around again, raises hand, then barks…)  “Officer CUTTER!!” OFFICER CUTTER:  (Raises Shears overhead and snaps them open and closed while shouting)  “SWAPP TEAM MOVE OUT!!!  ON TO THE NEXT BAR!!!” (All line up and prepare to head out, with ODDBALL hastily returning from the back room while pulling his pants up.  Officer WATERS squirts his SuperSoaker all around while marching, KLINK rattles his handcuffs, CUTTER snaps her shears, ODDBALL fans at invisible wisps of smoke with his ticket pad. The parade moves outward into the night while  BLOOMY pauses at the door for a last look around. He nods in satisfaction at another job well done, and lights a Tiparillo before joining his troops.)

 Michael J. McFadden,
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"

# 4 of 14
February 4, 2011 09:05 (EST)
Melissa Walton-Shirley

Michael,

I am so grateful that our culture is changing and has obviously come a long way in such a short period of time. Your piece just made that point. 

thanks for posting, 

Melissa

# 5 of 14
February 5, 2011 12:43 (EST)
harleyrider1778

Melissa,the culture didnt change, forced mandated laws bought with non-profit and big pharma money did it along with billions of tax dollars wasted in the form of stimulus grants pushed thru by obama and his minions in public health.I assume you are aware the ACS,ALA and AHA were created at the end of the last prohibition movement  by ROCKELFELLER to put a new face on an old enemy PROHIBITION........The ACS is the richest for profit non-profit in the world on the payroll of RWJF/JOHNSON AND JOHNSON big pharma makers of NRT'S nicotine replacement therapy drugs.........

 Now just how long you reckon these bans will last? They will end as the joke of second hand smoke becomes known by everybody. Ive challenged you and many others to defend your second hand smoke chirade.  The only thing youve accomplished is being a magician and getting the tv cameras to film your empty shoe drama down in Glasgow,,,ya I was there and I dont believe Ive ever seen a bigger bunch of absolute hogwash!

Now I gotta ask ya, dont you have any professional ethics  left, dont you worry about your prefessional name as the smoking prohibition laws get repealed and your name and standing become mud as the public learns you pushed such stupidity off on them........

You and many others in this game of insanity will be in the news begging the public to fogive you just as the last prohibitionists were left begging in the news reels for forgiveness when prohibition was last repealed.......

If you havent seen the times are changing and public health promoters become the target of apathy and disdain by the general public you had better be ready,Repeals come and at terrifying speeds for those who havent changed their positions. Truth not lies,not fabrication nor propganda.

Little white lies to outright lies is what tobacco control has become..........and as regina benjamin has gone to hiding since her debute of the 2010 SG REPORT,where she wouldnt tell the truth in the many interviews she did with news reporters and given the chance time and again but always jumping back to the no safe level spin or we have the science........shes been left nothing but a public farce in the view of america and the world.......Why would you want to be a part of a sinking ship that has become TOBACCO CONTROL!

 

# 6 of 14
February 5, 2011 12:52 (EST)
harleyrider1778

The American Cancer Society: The World's Wealthiest "Nonprofit ...The American Cancer Society (ACS) is accumulating great wealth in its role as .... to do everything to "wipe out cancer in your lifetime," the ACS fails to make ..... there has been dramatic progress in the treatment and cure of cancer, ...

www.preventcancer.com/losing/acs/wealthi... - Cached - SimilarThe American Cancer Society runs with the money and away from the ...Nov 29, 2010 ... The American Cancer Society (ACS) was back in the news this month when ... do everything to "wipe out cancer in your lifetime," the ACS has failed ..... mission is supposed to be preventing and finding a cure for cancer, ...

truthonmedecine.wordpress.com/.../the-american-cancer-society-runs-with- the-money-and-away-from-the-cure/ - Cached

# 7 of 14
February 5, 2011 01:06 (EST)
harleyrider1778
Expanded smoking ban offers cleaner air, but not cleaner bill of health

The New York City Council approved a bill Wednesday expanding the City’s public smoking ban to beaches and parks after a study showed 57 percent of New Yorkers had cotinine, a nicotine byproduct, in their blood compared with a 45 percent national average. Proponents of the measure argue that it was passed in the name of public health.  

ACSH’s Cheryl Martin points out that these smoking bans have become a very emotional issue because they pit individual rights against quality of life concerns. “This bill won't necessarily improve public health. As ACSH has pointed out many times, the impact of secondhand smoke on health is overstated. If I were a smoker, I would ask why even allow the sale of a product for use in New York if you have already banned its use in every venue conceivable? The question now becomes: Where can a smoker light up? As a non-smoker, it’s easy to accept at face value that these restrictions are great for me. But, in reality, does embracing this ban set a precedent for other government mandates, interventions and restrictions that are rooted in inferior science?”

ACSH’s Dr. Elizabeth Whelan agrees: “This is an extremist anti-smoking movement in action.” ACSH’s Dr. Gilbert Ross adds that the ban is actually part of the plan to “denormalize smoking and make it less appealing. Kids may looks at all the smokers shivering outside getting their nicotine fix and think twice before smoking cigarettes. Now, allowing the use of electronic cigarettes would be a public health benefit and keep the air clean for non-smokers.”

http://www.acsh.org/factsfears/newsID.2313/news_detail.asp

# 8 of 14
February 5, 2011 07:50 (EST)
Melissa

harleyrider,

Excellent point. I believe the best byproduct of smoking bans is to denormalize smoking. Wish it had happened here many years ago, perhaps I wouldn't have so many 38 year olds with coronary artery bypass grafting procedures and stents already under their belts. We don't have a lot of grandparents here in our area over the age of 60. For the asthmatic though, smoke exposure is even more of an immediate threat.

The bans are working amazingly well and are a sign that the human race acknowledges that smoking causes preventable illness and millions of deaths each year and we need to "denormalize" any habit so useless and so damaging.

Thanks for your post

Melissa

# 9 of 14
February 5, 2011 09:16 (EST)
harleyrider1778

38 year olds with coronary artery bypass grafting procedures and stents already under their belts

Really! Thats got to be a magical finding.........I assume you could document the cases and provide factual evidence that they didnt suffer from:

Many experts argue that passive smoking is also responsible for cardiovascular disease and other asthma attacks. Not you?

They don’t base it on any solid scientific evidence. Take the case of cardiovascular diseases: the four main causes are obesity, high cholesterol, hypertension and diabetes. To determine whether passive smoking is an aggravating factor, there should be a study on people who have none of these four symptoms. But this was never done. Regarding chronic bronchitis, although the role of active smoking is undeniable, that of passive smoking is yet to be proven. For asthma, it is indeed a contributing factor ... but not greater than pollen!

World-renowned pulmonologist, president of the prestigious Research Institute Necker for the last decade, Professor Philippe Even, now retired, tells us that he’s convinced of the absence of harm from passive smoking.

 

We don't have a lot of grandparents here in our area over the age of 60.

Its quite obvious you dont get out much.......Try the old folks home,theres plenty of smoking grand parents living there as since the ban those still living at home dont eat out any longer!

Barren counties smoking rate is around 45% and other counties bordering are even higher!

As far as lung cancer goes,Kentucky is in the belt of the highest levels of RADON than nearly any place else in the country.

Smoking has never ever been proven to cause any disease.....epidemiology can only correlate it to lung cancer but not prove it! Toxicology has yet to prove it where the end points meet and causation is established..........

In the case of SHS/ETS and non-smokers lung cancer an RR of 1.19 is nothing and thats if you can even believe the EPA report that was tossed as junk science.....

Heres the latest on lung cancer from researchers,READ IT!

Lung cancer in smokers may be different from lung cancer in nonsmokers: Vancouver study
By PAMELA FAYERMAN, Vancouver Sun


Although doctors and scientists have suspected for some time that there were different biological mechanisms underlying lung cancers in smokers and non-smokers, the B.C. study is said to be the first to find whole regions of mutations.

 

Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Lung+cancer+smokers+different+from+lung+cancer+nonsmokers

 

The bans are working amazingly well and are a sign that the human race acknowledges that smoking causes preventable illness and millions of deaths each year and we need to "denormalize" any habit so useless and so damaging.

The bans arent working at all. According to cdc smoking leveled off and at roughly the same time your prohibitional laws started showing up across the country in 2005-6.

In Ireland smoking rates have increased 12% since the ban to nearly 30% and bootlegging is nearly 60% of the legal market and in canada its even worse!

Now if you havent had the opportunity to read the following heres your chance,

In 2008 this paper was produced in America and concludes that nictotine and hence active smoking and passive smoking leads to less asthma. It also gives the aetiology (causation) why nicotine and the  biologial process that reduces asthma in recipients.

The results unequivocally show that, even after multiple allergen sensitizations, nicotine dramatically suppresses inflammatory/allergic parameters in the lung including the following: eosinophilic/lymphocytic emigration; mRNA and/or protein expression of the Th2 cytokines/chemokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-25, and eotaxin; leukotriene C4; and total as well as allergen-specific IgE.  unequivocally show that, even after multiple allergen sensitizations, nicotine dramatically suppresses inflammatory/allergic parameters in the lung including the following: eosinophilic/lymphocytic emigration; mRNA and/or protein expression of the Th2 cytokines/chemokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-25, and eotaxin; leukotriene C4; and total as well as allergen-specific IgE. ”

http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/abstract/180/11/7655

Asthma Death Rates Are Lower in States With Higher Rates of Smoking. The states of Utah and California, which have the lowest rates of smoking at 13.0 and 17.1 percent of adults respectively, are also among the states with the highest death rates from asthma. (Asthma Deaths, 2000; and: Smoking Among Adolescents, 2001, and Smoking Among Adults, 2001. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003 State Health Profiles, Atlanta, GA: US Deparment of Health and Human Services, 2003.

http://www.smokershistory.com/SmokAsth.gif

 

The EPA's Sorry Status Report on Children and Asthma
"America's Children and the Environment. Measures of Contaminants, Body Burdens, and Illnesses," Second Edition, US EPA, Feb. 2003. EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman boasts that "This report marks the progress we have made as a nation to reduce environmental risks faced by childen," including "Implementing the Smoke-Free Home Pledge campaign, designed to protect millions of children from the risks of tobacco smoke at home." On pdf p. 75, "Between 1980 and 1995, the percentage of children with asthma doubled, from 3.6 percent in 1980 to 7.5 percent in 1995." The graph on pdf page 67 boasts of declines in cotinine levels during this same period.

http://www.epa.gov/opeedweb/children/publications/ace_2003.pdf

The inconvenient truth is that the only studies of children of smokers suggest it is PROTECTIVE in contracting atopy in the first place. The New Zealand study says by a staggering factor of 82%.

“Participants with atopic parents were also less likely to have positive SPTs between ages 13 and 32 years if they smoked themselves (OR=0.18), and this reduction in risk remained significant after adjusting for confounders.

The authors write: “We found that children who were exposed to parental smoking and those who took up cigarette smoking themselves had a lower incidence of atopy to a range of common inhaled allergens.
“These associations were found only in those with a parental history of asthma or hay fever.”

They conclude: Our findings suggest that preventing allergic sensitization is not one of them.”

http://www.medwire-news.md/…/…gic_sensitization...

This is a Swedish study.

“Children of mothers who smoked at least 15 cigarettes a day tended to have lower odds for suffering from allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, allergic asthma, atopic eczema and food allergy, compared to children of mothers who had never smoked (ORs 0.6-0.7)

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between current exposure to tobacco smoke and a low risk for atopic disorders in smokers themselves and a similar tendency in their children.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubm…pubmed/ 11422156

 

# 10 of 14
February 5, 2011 10:17 (EST)
harleyrider1778

www.theheart.org In recent years, studies h?ν? shown th?t th? introduction οf smoking bans ?n public places ?? associated w?th significant reductions ?n th? incidence οf acute MI, ?n effect th?t appears tο b? sustained over ?n extended period. W?th growing evidence οf th? link between secondhand smoke ?n? adverse health effects, h?? th? time come fοr Americans tο demand federal laws th?t ban smoking ?n public places? Join moderator Dr Melissa Walton-Shirley ?n? h?r guests Nancy Brown ?n? Dr Clyde Yancy frοm th? AHA, ?? th?? discuss wh?t m??ht b? today’s mο?t ?m?οrt?nt public-health issue.

Heart attacks Frauds and Myths..

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7451/

ave you seen the study by NBER researchers which found that heart attacks rates are just as likely to increase as to decrease after the imposition of smoking bans. The study, CHANGES IN U.S HOSPITALIZATION AND MORTALITY RATES FOLLOWING
SMOKING BANS, concludes:

"U.S. state and local governments are increasingly restricting smoking in public places. This paper analyzes nationally representative databases, including the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, to compare short-term changes in mortality and hospitalization rates in smoking-restricted regions with control regions. In contrast with smaller regional studies, we find that workplace bans are not associated with statistically significant short-term declines in mortality or hospital admissions for myocardial infarction
or other diseases. An analysis simulating smaller studies using subsamples reveals that large short-term increases in myocardial infarction incidence following a workplace ban are as common as the large decreases reported in the published literature."

The researchers further suggest:

"We also show that there is wide year-to-year variation in myocardial infarction death and admission rates even in large regions such as counties and hospital catchment areas. Comparisons of small samples (which represent subsamples of our data and are similar to the samples used in the previous published literature) might have led to atypical findings. It is also possible that comparisons showing increases in cardiovascular events after a smoking ban were not submitted for publication because
the results were considered implausible. Hence, the true distribution from single 23 regions would include both increases and decreases in events and a mean close to zero, while the published record would show only decreases in events. Thus, publication bias could plausibly explain why dramatic short-term public health improvements were seen in prior studies of smoking bans."

# 11 of 14
February 5, 2011 10:30 (EST)
harleyrider1778

 Above link was dead

Lung cancer in smokers may be different from lung cancer in nonsmokers: Vancouver study



Read more: http://www.vancouversun.com/health/Lung+cancer+smokers+different+from+lung+cancer+nonsmokers+Vancouver+study/3802627/story.html#comments#ixzz1D6BSN1Ix

 

# 12 of 14
February 5, 2011 10:53 (EST)
harleyrider1778

Public smoking bans and cardiovascular health

 http://lower-my-cholesterol.net/87769/public-smoking-bans-and-cardiovascular-health/

Comments are closed.

Its nice that they wouldnt allow disenting voices to be heard EHH!

# 13 of 14
February 7, 2011 06:38 (EST)
harleyrider
Having a poor social network is as much of a risk for a man's health as heavy smoking, drinking and being obese, according to a recent study by authors Holt-Lunstad, Smith and Layton.

Social Relationships and Mortality Risk
The authors of this research study analysed one hundred years worth of research papers - 148 separate published studies drawn from the period 1900 to 2007 involving 308,849 participants - and came to the conclusion from all this data that individuals with stronger social relationships had a 50% increased likelihood of survival compared to those with poor or insufficient social relationships.

The authors of the meta-analysis postulated that there were two ways by which a good social network of family and friends could contribute to improved health. Firstly, the support of such a network could help to minimise the harmful effects of stress. As the old saying goes, "A problem shared is a problem halved". Secondly, these other individualss could influence the person to adopt behaviours that contribute to good health.



Read more at Suite101: Social Isolation Increases Health Risks for Men http://www.suite101.com/content/social-isolation-increases-health-risks-for-men-a318001#ixzz1DGuVF4xN
# 14 of 14
March 5, 2011 05:01 (EST)
Melissa

..............and the world is indeed flat!!!

Melissa


You must be a member (with full membership) to post a comment.
Already a member?
Enter your login information below:
 Remember me on this computer
Enjoy all the benefits of theheart.org

With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.

Membership is free!

About Dr Melissa Walton-Shirley
Dr Walton-Shirley performs invasive cardiology, nuclear cardiology, and stress echocardiography in a private practice in Glasgow, KY.

Her chief medical interests are CHF/hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and the promotion of primary PCI for acute MI. Recently she played a significant role in helping to launch an ambitious pilot study of primary PCI in Kentucky, the Kentucky Primary Angioplasty Pilot Project. She has also participated in the TIMI 19, Duke-HF, NRMI, and CRUSADE trials and is proud to have been an advocate of the first smoke-free initiative in Kentucky (2011). She champions a smoke-free America.

Dr Walton-Shirley received her undergraduate degree at the University of Kentucky and went to medical school and did her residency and fellowship at the University of Louisville. She is married with two daughters. Her interests include singing, writing poetry and songs, fitness, and, of course, theheart.org.