Heartfelt with Dr Melissa Walton-Shirley

View all posts »

Frustration abounds: EU and US governments stranglehold prevention

Aug 31, 2009 09:04 EDT


In press conference today, we heard from Dr. Faergeman of Denmark about the need to eat less red meat.  It causes cancer.  It’s responsible for 18% of greenhouse admissions.  It increases thermal stress. The resulting unstable climate will produce more famine and disease.  I saw flashes of the movie “The Day After Tomorrow” and a vision of myself swimming for my life in the top of the New York Public Library after the Tsunami “ as he spoke. Getting back to reality, I realized I was still safe, warm and dry in the pressroom and I’m an American so I probably don't believe in global anything.(kidding).  But you don’t have to believe in global warming to understand that red meat is not the optimal way to nourish our bodies. 

INDIVIDUAL solution:  Eat a fish. Ride a bike. Save a cow.

GOVERNMENT solution: make red meat less affordable to produce, less affordable to purchase and give government support to agriculturists who grow vegetables and fruit.

Dr. Sandra Erbs of Leipzig Heart Center dragged us to the depths of despair with her presentation on the most sinister of all medical affronts, childhood obesity.  Even prison inmates know that child predators are the bottom feeders of their society, and so it is with regard to obesity in the young as a CV risk factor. Obese children ranging from 7-17 years already have thick CIMT’s, elevated LDL’s, lower HDL’s, 8-10 mm hg greater systolic BP’s, and impaired endothelial function.   Worst of all, virtually all of them have elevated insulin levels.  Though the term pre-diabetic was utilized, I beg to differ.  As I always say, you can’t be “borderline pregnant”.  You “either are or you aren’t” glucose impaired and it’s the same from my perspective with diabetes.  

INDIVIDUAL solution:  Moms and Dads get your kids off their butts, away from the television and the internet, and onto bikes and playing fields.  Firstly, we parents need to get off "our" butts and get out there with them.  Purchase healthy foods and socialize distaste for eating poorly and implement a system of praise for eating well.

GOVERNMENT solution:  Mandate physical education in every school. Reward work environments that foster fitness programs for their employees with tax breaks.  Offer tax breaks to any business whose income is based upon promoting physical activity. Let’s get away from the absolutely stupid “big is beautiful campaign” that’s been going on for 2 decades in America and replace it with more truthful and unsettling "Fat is fatal" campaign instead.

Dr. Jaakko Tuomilehto from Finland gets my “I want to be most like you” award. He presented information on modifiable risk factors and the impact of governmental intervention.  What else can one expect from a guy who comes from Finland, the first country to ban public smoking and to legislate salt content? “Oh my Gosh!!” the “right to choose” folks in America are quaking in their boots right now. Because of our absolute preoccupation with ensuring our ability to eat transfat “because we want to”, and smoke anywhere  “because we want to”, and “use a salt shaker “because we want to”, we don’t “get to” enjoy the 75% reduction in cardiovascular disease burden like they have in Finland.  We’re laughing all the way to the emergency room but there aren’t many jokes at the funeral and we aren’t able to really connect the dots in America.  The Europeans already have the picture and just need to slide a few pieces together. Admirable.

Individual solution: Layperson:  get on the Internet and learn something about your health. Physicians: get on the phone and impact legislation.

Government solution: President Obama-you have a huge pile of cash that would move from the pharmaceutical industry and Medicare directly into your lap.  Smoke free legislation is a no brainer.  Salt monitoring is a no brainer. Transfat legislation is a no brainer.  Exercise implementation is a no brainer. Since it doesn’t take brains, it’s going to take brawn.  Ted Kennedy had both.  Wish he could have stayed around a lot longer in that regard.   

I love America, but it’s always difficult to leave Europe where the physicians are so enthusiastic about population science and its impact on quality of life.

I’m so motivated that I’m going to go eat a fish, ride a bike…save a cow, right now.  

 








Your comments
Frustration abounds: EU and US governments stranglehold prevention
# 1 of 7
September 1, 2009 12:02 (EDT)
Joshua Feuer

Sorry but I can’t let your diatribe go unchallenged. What happened to freedom and personal responsibility? Let people pay for their own health care and then let them do what they want. The best way to alter behavior is to experience the adverse consequences (medical and financial) of foolish choices. Salt and trans-fat monitoring? Please…I suppose you’d also want to outlaw fast food, motorcycles, football and alcohol because they all have potential adverse health consequences. What if the environmentalists want to outlaw the consumption of fish because of overfishing the oceans…what would you eat then? For some folks…the pursuit of happiness is having a cheeseburger and a beer at a football game riding their motorcycle home without a helmet. Who are you to deprive them of that? I’ll take the USA as it is thank you. Have fun in Europe! What exactly don’t you like about socialism?

# 2 of 7
September 1, 2009 03:49 (EDT)
melissa

Sorry Josh,

I'd take a little longer to answer your reply to my "diatribe" but I have to get back to work so I can make more tax dollars to pay for your helmet-less ride home on your motorbike :) just in case.......

I'm as much for freedom as anyone but when it's not tempered with common sense, or concern for what your choice does to the choices of other people or when it's laced with selfishness, then I take issue with that. Pah-leeese,...maybe you aren't one of them, but often the  "right to choose" folks often don't really understand the issues.They are just responding to their primal cravings for self satisfaction with little regard for the consequences.If they would just take time to educate themselves, then their freedoms would multiple 1000 fold, some of which include things like being able to keep both their legs, breathe enough to walk in the mall or live long enough to see their grandchildren.

 Let's take transfats for instance.  If it tastes the same to you but will kill you 30% less often and makes it such that you cost the tax payers or government or your insurance company 300,000 dollars less in your lifetime, OR keeps you in the work force longer, what do you really care? Legislate away. The  Freedom to live with less hassle abounds!

"Let people pay for their own health care".  Are you really from planet USA?  So many people in the US can't get access to health care because we are paying for the helmet-less, those who smoke, the obese, etc. etc.  It's a slippery slope when you discuss freedom vs legislation, but since we haven't even started climbing that hill yet, I'd encourage you to take the common sense train to the top just to have a look at what is really happening in our country. 

As far as being a socialist, I'm really more of a freedom fighter but the freedoms I'm fighting fore include things like freeing up money spent on things that could be easily changed with a dramatic impact.  My niece is NOT free to dine anywhere she likes in Barren County Ky. because the right to choose folks still poison her air and the air of everyone who works and dines in their airspace.  My husband is not free to phone either of his parents because they were both deceased before they could  meet two of their grandchildren (no smoke free legislation in their town to curb teen addiction, which by the way works very well). Many patients can't get funding for device therapy because we are spending millions on the obesity epidemic.  So, legislating common sense starts with educating common sense but if education cannot make a change in our lifetime, then legislation has to make up the difference in time .   

Calm down Joshua.  I don't think anyone is in immediate danger of getting a microchip in their scalp.  We are talking about salt, cigarettes, wearing a helmet.

 I think you've been watching way too many BOURNE Identity movies!!!

Thanks for the banter.  I'd walk a mile to debate it!!!

Melissa 

 

# 3 of 7
September 1, 2009 12:02 (EDT)
Joshua Feuer

Melissa,

I exercise for 60-90 minutes 6 days per week, avoid trans-fats, don't smoke, take omega-3 and eat fish. I also, however, enjoy an occasional plate of carnitas or an In-N-Out Cheeseburger, beer and wine and want to be able to continue to enjoy them at a reasonable price. I believe that healthcare is neither a "right" or a "privilege" but a personal responsibility. And I agree that most of the "right to choose" folks don't understand the issues, but niether do the "right to healthcare from cradle-to-grave folks". That's because the politicians pander to their constituents and won't tell them the truth. If the majority wants government healthcare, I'm willing to go along (albeit reluctantly). If the government is going to be paying for your health care, however, that means the government gets to make the rules to keep you healthy and ration care to keep costs down, which includes sin taxes on alcohol, tobacco, fat, salt and sugar (and why not tax BMI >25), generic medications, motorcycle helmets and not paying for a CABG in your 70 year old grandpa who smoked and ate too much. I just want people to be able to make an informed choice and know what they are choosing. Taxing and rationing will be part of government healthcare.

Josh

 

# 4 of 7
September 1, 2009 02:46 (EDT)
melissa

Josh,

I want to clarify that I don't WANT government health care, but I also DON'T WANT to go to the dentist either.  I'm also NOT a socialist.  I'm being practical.  I"d like to help champion a form of medicine that is somewhere between socialism and the the  free enterprise system we have currently that is failing so many of the elderly and the poor. It's easy to say everything is great with your plate full, but when we ignore the reason for the 50% compliance rate in America, that answers are there.  Just ask our patients.  They simply can't afford to get the medicine much of the time.  

In the "next" system, a heavy emphasis should be placed on personal responsibiity.  If you keep smoking, it should  be difficult to get an elective PCI or an elective CABG. Physicians and practitioners should be able to have a mechanism to champion a treatment for our patients that might not be mainstream but might have evidence out there to support. There should be avenues to allow for discussion and debate.  Access should be a priority.

I could go one for a hundred years about the ideals, but as long as we are insisting that something simple like riding a motorbike without a helmet is just too much to sacrifice, alas, I think we may have an unnecessarily difficult wait . 

# 5 of 7
September 2, 2009 04:54 (EDT)
Carolyn Thomas
If I may interject here, from the perspective of a heart attack survivor in Canada (also known to some Americans as "Commie Pinko Land of Socialized Medicine"):  I recommend reading T.R. Reid's recent piece in the Washington Post: "Five Myths About Health Care in the Rest of the World".  
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/21/AR2009082101778.html 
 
Reid's comparisons between your U.S. health care system and virtually every other advanced country on the planet are sobering.  The U.S. ranks 37th in the world in quality health care access. The infant mortality rate is double what almost every other advanced country is.  It was such an eye-opener to me that I was moved to write: "Why You Should Have Your Heart Attack in Canada" immediately after I read it.   http://myheartsisters.org/2009/08/27/u-s-medcare/
 
I live in a city that has essentially banned all smoking in public places - and yes, that even includes outdoor patios at all bars. When this idea first surfaced, the response from pub owners and from smokers was pure hysteria.  Fast forward one year:  the pubs are jam-packed, patios at the bars are standing-room only. The difference is that we non-smokers are able to go to pubs now.
 
I'm all for individual rights, but your right to smoke ends at my right to breathe.  Very simple.  Your right to ride your Harley (or your bicycle) helmet-free ends at my responsibility to pay for your stay in government funded longterm rehab after your brain damage.
 
In the U.K., we are already seeing patients who refuse to quit drinking having their names removed from liver transplant waiting lists, because outcomes for these patients are so dismal.  When resources (organs!) are scarce, it finally does become a matter of personal responsibility.  Is that rationing?  I guess so - but doesn't that make sense?
 
Cheers,
Carolyn Thomas 
 
 
 
# 6 of 7
September 3, 2009 12:08 (EDT)
Michael in Arizona

I am not a cardiologist (nor do I play one on TV) but find your column to be extraordinarily refreshing. I was lucky enough to be involved in the implementation of Arizona's smoke-free ordinance, which bans smoking in bars and restaurants and businesses (www.smokefreearizona.org). Yes, even in a red state like Arizona, where you are free to ride your Harley sans helmet and sport your AR-15 when President Obama comes to town, we recognize that exposure to toxic smoke is a bad thing. We also had hysteria when voters approved this measure (fueled by a competing measure funded by the tobacco industry), but the smoke free ordinance has proven to be very popular.

It may take a few more decades to get a similar measured passed regarding trans fats, but as the Smoke Free Arizona law shows, it might just be possible in the Wild West.

Michael

 

# 7 of 7
September 4, 2009 03:54 (EDT)
Melissa

Michael and Carolyn,

Love you guys!!! Can't tell you how much I appreciate your posts!

Hope you enjoy always enjoy "Heartfelt" in good health!!

Melissa


You must be a member (with full membership) to post a comment.
Already a member?
Enter your login information below:
 Remember me on this computer
Enjoy all the benefits of theheart.org

With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.

Membership is free!

About Dr Melissa Walton-Shirley
Dr Walton-Shirley performs invasive cardiology, nuclear cardiology, and stress echocardiography in a private practice in Glasgow, KY.

Her chief medical interests are CHF/hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and the promotion of primary PCI for acute MI. Recently she played a significant role in helping to launch an ambitious pilot study of primary PCI in Kentucky, the Kentucky Primary Angioplasty Pilot Project. She has also participated in the TIMI 19, Duke-HF, NRMI, and CRUSADE trials and is proud to have been an advocate of the first smoke-free initiative in Kentucky (2011). She champions a smoke-free America.

Dr Walton-Shirley received her undergraduate degree at the University of Kentucky and went to medical school and did her residency and fellowship at the University of Louisville. She is married with two daughters. Her interests include singing, writing poetry and songs, fitness, and, of course, theheart.org.