Private practice with Dr Seth Bilazarian

View all posts »

Where to from AIM-HIGH?

Jun 3, 2011 10:40 EDT


Should we continue to pursue HDL therapy? Does the concept of treating for residual risk still make sense? Important questions are raised by the halting of the AIM-HIGH trial. As we await the trial data, how have you modified your clinical practice? What advice are you giving your patients?

Disclosure: I was a clinical investigator for AIM-HIGH

See also:

AIM-HIGH Study Statement to (NLA) Members

Learning from AIM-HIGH

NIH pulls plug on AIM-HIGH trial with niacin

AIM-HIGH: Maybe we should still hold on to our HATS?

A snapshot of the cholesterol drug market








Your comments
Where to from AIM-HIGH?
# 1 of 2
June 8, 2011 10:00 (EDT)
oc1dean
I was a participant  and considering the side effects I got the max dose. After three years I was ready to drop out because the side effect of itching was so bad, it caused excema to flare up  causing me to scratch it until it bled. Really wonder if a lower dose would have enough protective effects but not cause the side effects.
# 2 of 2
June 17, 2011 10:59 (EDT)
W.E. Feeman, Jr, MD

AIM HIGH simply shows what I published 10 years ago in J Cardiovasc Risk,2000; 7: 415-423.  When LDL is low enough, HDL is immaterial.  By low enough, I mean anywhere lower than 80 mg/dl (2.0 mmoles/L).  Under such circumstances, angiographic stabilization/regeression of coronary artery plaque occurs in 93% of cases.  When plaques stabilize or regress, atherothrombotic disease (ATD) events fall dramatically.  This has been my experience over the last 10 years.  While I personally do not prescribe Niaspan due to its itching and flushing effects, I should think that if LDL levels exceed 80 mg/dl and if HDL is low (39 mg/dl [1.0 mmoles/L or less),  I personally would have no problem with physicians prescribing Niaspan.  I disagree with Dr Bilazarian about fibrates, though I do think that they should only be used when HDL is low and TG are high.  The prediction of the populatiuon at risk of ATD is published in Experimentqal and Clinical Cardiology, 2004;9(4): 235-241.

Incidentally, remember that the above goals are based on the indirect measurement of HDL.  Tahe direct measurement of HDL gives a value about 10 mg/dl (0.25 mmoles/L) higher than the indirect measurement, and hence the LDL value obtained by calculation will be 10 mg/dl lower when HDL is measured by the direct method (JClin Lipid, 2008; 2(5):401-402).


You must be a member (with full membership) to post a comment.
Already a member?
Enter your login information below:
 Remember me on this computer
Enjoy all the benefits of theheart.org

With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.

Membership is free!

About Dr Seth Bilazarian
Seth Bilazarian MD has been a Clinical and Interventional Cardiologist at Pentucket Medical Associates in Massachusetts since 1993. He is board certified in Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Medicine, Nuclear Cardiology, Vascular Ultrasound, Interventional Cardiology, and Vascular and Endovascular Medicine.

Dr Bilazarian performs coronary and peripheral interventions at Lahey Clinic and Massachusetts General Hospital. He has been an investigator in the interventional laboratory for new devices including drug-eluting stents, distal protection devices, imaging devices (OCT and InfraRed), and anticoagulant pharmacotherapy.

Dr Bilazarian is an active participant in clinical trials in congestive heart failure, hypertension, coronary disease prevention, prediabetes management, anemia, atrial fibrillation, and anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapies in the outpatient setting. He has authored numerous papers and book chapters in clinical cardiology. He was appointed as a physician advisor to the circulatory device panel of the FDA in 2008.
About this blog
My intent is to create a forum for dialogue on issues pertinent to private practice cardiology around topics such as:

  • Integration of new data and guidelines on inpatient and outpatient practice in clinical and interventional cardiology
  • Practice approaches to the extra clinical issues in dealing with managed care insurers
  • Strategies for navigating the restrictions of pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) on pharmacologic therapies for our patients
  • Experiences with restrictions on testing and imaging
The video blog (VLOG) will provide an opportunity to share broadly different approaches to the common conundrums we face in caring for patients. My hope is that this forum will provide useful data points for practice outside of tertiary and academic centers and a look inside community hospitals and physician?s practice patterns in the office, starting with mine.