Ezetimibe in ARBITER 6-HALTS: What lessons can we learn?

Nov 16, 2009 17:00 EST


Another trial has failed to show efficacy for ezetimibe. What can we learn from this unfortunate saga?

See:

ARBITER 6-HALTS: HDL raising with niacin superior to ezetimibe








Your comments
Ezetimibe in ARBITER 6-HALTS: What lessons can we learn?
# 1 of 3
November 17, 2009 08:24 (EST)
Rafael Olvera MD

ARBITER 6-HALTS shows in a short period (14 months) a clinical (Kaplan-Meier estimates) and IMT benefits but What is the fastest mechanism of reverse cholesterol transport? increased HDL or decreased LDL. The baseline LDL levels in Ezetimibe and Niacin groups was almost 80 mg/dl, good target for secondary prevention. Long period trial using IVUS is needed to get conclusive results before killing ezetimibe.

# 2 of 3
November 20, 2009 09:50 (EST)
Gary Cramer

In patient discussions there are two principals that stand out.  If the procedure/pill/treatment does not make one feel better and or live longer, it should be questioned.  I think may be an ok alternative to I know as we do not know which patient will benefit and are happy if a small percentage does benefit.  When it is a matter of odds as to whether there is any benefit of a drug etc., is a multibillion dollar bet justified?

# 3 of 3
December 4, 2009 01:49 (EST)
Alain Efstratiou
After this trial there is no justification for using ezitimibe. Especially as some people say that IMPROVE-IT is unlikely to be completed.

You must be a member (with full membership) to post a comment.
Already a member?
Enter your login information below:
 Remember me on this computer
Enjoy all the benefits of theheart.org

With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.

Membership is free!