PACE: A trial that challenges dogma

Nov 24, 2009 13:50 EST


This well designed trial sought to find out whether placing a right ventricular lead at the apex--as per standard pacing procedure--leads to adverse cardiac remodeling and hence could promote heart failure and cardiac death. The results not only challenge dogma but pose a dilemma for clinical practice. How do you interpret the PACE trial? What are your thoughts?

See:

PACE: BiV pacing protects against RV pacing's adverse ventricular effects in randomized trial

Cheuk-Man Y, Yat-Sun Chan J, Zhang Q, et al. Biventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2009; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907555. Available at: http://www.nejm.org.








Your comments
PACE: A trial that challenges dogma
# 1 of 1
March 18, 2010 01:00 (EDT)
Sami Pakarinen, MD

 

Dear Dr.Topol,

In our clinic ( 700 pacing device implantations annually ) like in most high volume centers RV apical pacing has been abandoned for many years. The alternative has been RV septal pacing which desynchronizes the electrical activation of the LV much less than RV apical pacing. Only the patients with LBBB, wide QRS and poor LV function really need bivenricular pacing. So patients with heart block and normal LV function can be managed with DDD RV septal pacing.

Best regards

Sami Pakarinen, MD

Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, Europe


You must be a member (with full membership) to post a comment.
Already a member?
Enter your login information below:
 Remember me on this computer
Enjoy all the benefits of theheart.org

With full membership, you can check out our educational and editorial content, search the site, receive our newsletters, join discussions, download slides and much more.

Membership is free!